The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Particulate matter air quality assessment using integrated surface, satellite, and meteorological products: 2. A neural network approach
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, sparse, surface‐based air quality monitoring has been improved by using wide‐swath, satellite‐derived aerosol products. However, satellites are sensitive to the entire aerosol column, not only the aerosol near the surface that impacts human health. In part 1 of this series, we used multiple regression to demonstrate how inclusion of meteorological analyses can help constrain the surface level proportion of the aerosol profile and improve the estimate of surface PM2.5. Here, instead of multiple regression technique, we describe an artificial neural network (ANN) framework that reduces the uncertainty of surface PM estimation from satellite data. We use 3 years of MODIS aerosol optical thickness data at 0.55 μ m and meteorological analyses from the rapid update cycle to estimate surface level PM2.5 over the southeast United States (EPA region 4). As compared to regression coefficients obtained through simple correlation (R = 0.60) or multiple regression (R = 0.68) techniques, the ANN derives hourly PM2.5 data that compare with observations with R = 0.74. For estimating daily mean PM2.5, the ANN techniques results in correlation of R = 0.78. Although the degree of improvement varies over different sites and seasons, this study demonstrates the potential for using ANN for operational air quality monitoring.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
Bishop, C. M. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 · Cited by 12,287
Cited by
Deep learning in environmental remote sensing: Achievements and challenges
Yuan, Q., Shen, H., Li, T., Li, Z., Li, S., Jiang, Y., Xu, H., Tan, W., Yang, Q., Wang, J., et al. (2020) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2020.111716 · Cited by 1,697
Di, Q., Amini, H., Shi, L., Kloog, I., Silvern, R., Kelly, J., Sabath, M. B., Choirat, C., Koutrakis, P., Lyapustin, A., et al. (2019) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.104909 · Cited by 733
Estimating PM2.5 Concentrations in the Conterminous United States Using the Random Forest Approach
Hu, X., Belle, J. H., Meng, X., Wildani, A., Waller, L. A., Strickland, M. J., & Liu, Y. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b01210 · Cited by 629
Li, T., Shen, H., Yuan, Q., Zhang, X., & Zhang, L. (2017) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2017gl075710 · Cited by 414
Requia, W. J., Di, Q., Silvern, R., Kelly, J. T., Koutrakis, P., Mickley, L. J., Sulprizio, M. P., Amini, H., Shi, L., & Schwartz, J. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c01791 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Gupta, P., & Christopher, S. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2009-10-27
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- D20
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081990052
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Particulate matter air quality assessment using integrated surface, satellite, and meteorological products: 2. A neural network approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2008jd011497
- The paper
- Gupta, P., & Christopher, S. A. (2009). Particulate matter air quality assessment using integrated surface, satellite, and meteorological products: 2. A neural network approach. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd011497
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.