The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Segmentation of X‐ray computed tomography images of porous materials: A crucial step for characterization and quantitative analysis of pore structures
Open accessAbstract
Nondestructive imaging methods such as X‐ray computed tomography (CT) yield high‐resolution, three‐dimensional representations of pore space and fluid distribution within porous materials. Steadily increasing computational capabilities and easier access to X‐ray CT facilities have contributed to a recent surge in microporous media research with objectives ranging from theoretical aspects of fluid and interfacial dynamics at the pore scale to practical applications such as dense nonaqueous phase liquid transport and dissolution. In recent years, significant efforts and resources have been devoted to improve CT technology, microscale analysis, and fluid dynamics simulations. However, the development of adequate image segmentation methods for conversion of gray scale CT volumes into a discrete form that permits quantitative characterization of pore space features and subsequent modeling of liquid distribution and flow processes seems to lag. In this paper we investigated the applicability of various thresholding and locally adaptive segmentation techniques for industrial and synchrotron X‐ray CT images of natural and artificial porous media. A comparison between directly measured and image‐derived porosities clearly demonstrates that the application of different segmentation methods as well as associated operator biases yield vastly differing results. This illustrates the importance of the segmentation step for quantitative pore space analysis and fluid dynamics modeling. Only a few of the tested methods showed promise for both industrial and synchrotron tomography. Utilization of local image information such as spatial correlation as well as the application of locally adaptive techniques yielded significantly better results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
A Computational Approach to Edge Detection
Canny, J. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1986.4767851 · Cited by 30,004
Cited by
Wildenschild, D., & Sheppard, A. P. (2013) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.07.018 · Cited by 1,239
X-ray computed tomography of polymer composites
Garcea, S. C., Wang, Y., & Withers, P. J. (2018) · Composites Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.10.023 · Cited by 719
Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X‐ray microtomography: A review
Schlüter, S., Sheppard, A., Brown, K., & Wildenschild, D. (2014) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2014wr015256 · Cited by 656
Bultreys, T., De Boever, W., & Cnudde, V. (2016) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.02.001 · Cited by 474
Segmentation of digital rock images using deep convolutional autoencoder networks
Karimpouli, S., & Tahmasebi, P. (2019) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2019.02.003 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Iassonov, P., Gebrenegus, T., & Tuller, M.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 9
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2141173661
- Cited by
- 628
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Segmentation of X‐ray computed tomography images of porous materials: A crucial step for characterization and quantitative analysis of pore structures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2009wr008087
- The paper
- Iassonov, P., Gebrenegus, T., & Tuller, M. (2009). Segmentation of X‐ray computed tomography images of porous materials: A crucial step for characterization and quantitative analysis of pore structures. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009wr008087
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.