Impact of the Atlantic warm pool on United States landfalling hurricanes: CLIMATE AND LANDFALLING HURRICANES
Abstract
[1] The 2010 Atlantic hurricane season was extremely active, but no hurricanes made landfall in the United States, raising a question of what dictated the hurricane track. Here we use observations from 1970–2010 (also extending back to 1950) and numerical model experiments to show that the Atlantic warm pool (AWP) – a large body of warm water comprised of the Gulf of Mexico, the Caribbean Sea and the western tropical North Atlantic – plays an important role in the hurricane track. An eastward expansion of the AWP shifts the hurricane genesis location eastward, decreasing the possibility for a hurricane to make landfall. A large AWP also induces barotropic stationary wave patterns that weaken the North Atlantic subtropical high and produce the eastward steering flow anomalies along the eastern seaboard of the United States. Due to these two mechanisms, hurricanes are steered toward the northeast without making landfall in the United States. Although the La Nina event in the Pacific may be associated with the increased number of Atlantic hurricanes, its relationship with landfalling activity has been offset in 2010 by the effect of the extremely large AWP.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There have been marked changes in Atlantic land-falling TCs in the past several decades.
“There have been marked changes in Atlantic land-falling TCs in the past several decades (Wang et al., 2011;Kossin, 2017).”
From The tropical atlantic observing system (2019) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2011
Cites
A More General Framework for Understanding Atlantic Hurricane Variability and Trends
Kossin, J. P., & Vimont, D. J. (2007) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-88-11-1767 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The tropical atlantic observing system
Foltz, G. R., Brandt, P., Richter, I., Rodríguez-Fonseca, B., Hernandez, F., Dengler, M., Rodrigues, R. R., Schmidt, J. O., Yu, L., Lefevre, N., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00206 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, C., Liu, H., Lee, S.-K., & Atlas, R.
- Affiliations
- NOAA Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratories (US)
- University of Miami (US)
- Venue
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- n/a-n/a
- ISSN
- 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1668707338
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Keywords
- Atlantic Warm Pool, landfalling hurricanes, North Atlantic subtropical high, La Niña, Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean Sea, eastern United States coast
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review