The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bias correction of the ENSEMBLES high-resolution climate change projections for use by impact models: Evaluation on the present climate
Open accessAbstract
[1] A statistical bias correction technique is applied to a set of high-resolution climate change simulations for Europe from 11 state-of-the-art regional climate models (RCMs) from the project ENSEMBLES. Modeled and observed daily values of mean, minimum and maximum temperature and total precipitation are used to construct transfer functions for the period 1961–1990, which are then applied to the decade 1991–2000, where the results are evaluated. By using a large ensembles of model runs and a long construction period, we take into account both intermodel variability and longer (e.g., decadal) natural climate variability. Results show that the technique performs successfully for all variables over large part of the European continent, for all seasons. In particular, the probability distribution functions (PDFs) of both temperature and precipitation are greatly improved, especially in the tails, i.e., increasing the capability of reproducing extreme events. When the statistics of bias-corrected results are ensemble averaged, the result is very close to the observed ones. The bias correction technique is also able to improve statistics that depend strongly on the temporal sequence of the original field, such as the number of consecutive dry days and the total amount of precipitation in consecutive heavy precipitation episodes, which are quantities that may have a large influence on, e.g., hydrological or crop impact models. Bias-corrected projections of RCMs are hence found to be potentially useful for the assessment of impacts of climate change over Europe.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Piani, C., Weedon, G. P., Best, M., Gomes, S. M., Viterbo, P., Hagemann, S., & Haerter, J. O. (2010) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.10.024 · Cited by 868
Christensen, J. H., Boberg, F., Christensen, O. B., & Lucas‐Picher, P. (2008) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2008gl035694 · Cited by 729
Cited by
Gudmundsson, L., Bremnes, J. B., Haugen, J. E., & Engen-Skaugen, T. (2012) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-16-3383-2012 · Cited by 1,318
A trend-preserving bias correction – the ISI-MIP approach
Hempel, S., Frieler, K., Warszawski, L., Schewe, J., & Piontek, F. (2013) · Earth System Dynamics · doi:10.5194/esd-4-219-2013 · Cited by 1,238
“Interactive Discussion D iscssion P aper | D iscssion P aper | D iscssion P aper | D iscssion P aper | Statistical bias correction of simulation data is broadly applicable to the climate impacts research (Robock et al., 1993; Berg et al., 2003; Ines and Hansen, 2006; Hagemann et al., 2011; Dosio and Paruolo, 2011), si…”
MethodIntensification of future severe heat waves in India and their effect on heat stress and mortality
Murari, K. K., Ghosh, S., Patwardhan, A., Daly, E., & Salvi, K. (2015) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-014-0660-6 · Cited by 216
Future Hydrological Drought Analysis Considering Agricultural Water Withdrawal Under SSP Scenarios
Kim, J. H., Sung, J. H., Shahid, S., & Chung, E.-S. (2022) · Water Resources Management · doi:10.1007/s11269-022-03116-1 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Dosio, A., & Paruolo, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2011-08-18
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- D16
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001783620
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bias correction of the ENSEMBLES high-resolution climate change projections for use by impact models: Evaluation on the present climate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2011jd015934
- The paper
- Dosio, A., & Paruolo, P. (2011). Bias correction of the ENSEMBLES high-resolution climate change projections for use by impact models: Evaluation on the present climate. Journal of Geophysical Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd015934
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.