Cited by 60Climate variability and modelsMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsClimate Change and Geoengineering

Machine Learning Predictions of a Multiresolution Climate Model Ensemble

Open access
Anderson, Gemma J., Lucas, Donald D.·2018·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

Statistical models of high‐resolution climate models are useful for many purposes, including sensitivity and uncertainty analyses, but building them can be computationally prohibitive. We generated a unique multiresolution perturbed parameter ensemble of a global climate model. We use a novel application of a machine learning technique known as random forests to train a statistical model on the ensemble to make high‐resolution model predictions of two important quantities: global mean top‐of‐atmosphere energy flux and precipitation. The random forests leverage cheaper low‐resolution simulations, greatly reducing the number of high‐resolution simulations required to train the statistical model. We demonstrate that high‐resolution predictions of these quantities can be obtained by training on an ensemble that includes only a small number of high‐resolution simulations. We also find that global annually averaged precipitation is more sensitive to resolution changes than to any of the model parameters considered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2018gl077049

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anderson and Lucas used random forests to make high-resolution predictions from a mix of high-and low-resolution models, which could reduce the costs of building multi-model ensembles.

    “More recently, Anderson and Lucas used random forests to make high-resolution predictions from a mix of high-and low-resolution models, which could reduce the costs of building multi-model ensembles [23].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [23]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Monteleoni, C., G. A. Schmidt, S. Saroha, and E. Asplund (2011), Tracking climate mod- els, Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal, 4(4), 372-392.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, G. J., & Lucas, D. D.
Affiliations
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Anderson, Gemma J.
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2018-05-05
Volume
45
Issue
9
Pages
4273-4280
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2801390916
Cited by
60
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • United States Department of Energy (DE-AC52-07NA27344)
  • DOE's Office of Science Scientific Discovery
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
Keywords
perturbed parameter ensemble, random forest, statistical downscaling, global precipitation, model resolution sensitivity, uncertainty analysis, global climate models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review