Cited by 33Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesClimate variability and modelsMarine and coastal ecosystems

Coherent Circulation Changes in the Deep North Atlantic From 16°N and 26°N Transport Arrays

Open access
Frajka‐Williams, E., Lankhorst, M., Koelling, J., Send, U.·2018·Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

Abstract

The meridional overturning circulation (MOC) has been measured by boundary arrays in the Atlantic since 2000. Over the past decade of measurements, however, the reported tendencies in overturning circulation strength have differed between 16°N and 26°N. Here we investigate these differences by diagnosing their origin in the observed hydrography, finding that both arrays show deep waters (below 1,100 dbar) at the western boundary becoming fresher and less dense. The associated change in geopotential thickness is about 0.15 m 2 s−2 between 2004–2009 and 2010–2014, with the shift occurring between 2009 and 2010 and earlier at 26°N than 16°N. In the absence of a similar density change on the east of the Atlantic, this middepth reduction in water density at the west would drive an increase in the shear between the upper and lower layers of North Atlantic Deep Water of about 2.6 Sv at 26°N and 3.9 Sv at 16°N. These transport anomalies result in an intensifying tendency in the MOC estimate at 16°N, but at 26°N, the method of correcting the geostrophic reference level results in an opposing (reducing) tendency of the MOC. The results indicate that both arrays are observing coherent, low‐frequency changes, but that there remain discrepancies in the methods of addressing the geostrophic reference level for boundary arrays measuring ocean circulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2018jc013949

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Since 2000, a mooring array has been maintained at 16N that includes velocity measurements covering the DWBC east of Guadeloupe and additional geostrophic moorings measuring the deep flow between the continental slope and the mid-Atlantic ridge.

    “Since 2000, a mooring array has been maintained at 16 • N that includes velocity measurements covering the DWBC east of Guadeloupe and additional geostrophic moorings measuring the deep flow between the continental slope and the mid-Atlantic ridge (Send et al., 2011;Frajka-Williams et al., 2018).”

    From The tropical atlantic observing system (2019) · cites this paper as Frajka-Williams et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Baringer, M. O., Smeed, D. A., Willis, J., Lankhorst, M., Hobbs, W. R., Dong, S., et al. (2017). Meridional overturning and oceanic heat transport circulation observations in the North Atlantic Ocean. In J. Blunden & D. S. Arndt (Eds.), State of the climate in 2016. Bulletin of the Ameri- can Meteorological Society, 98, S84-S87. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0148. · DOI
  2. Bentel, K, Landerer, F. W., & Boening, C. (2015). Monitoring Atlantic overturning circulation and transport variability with GRACE-type ocean bottom pressure observations-A sensitivity study. Ocean Science, 11, 953-963. https://doi.org/10.5194/os-11-953-2015 · DOI
  3. Bingham, R. J., Hughes, C. W., Roussenov, V., & Williams, R. G. (2007). Meridional coherence of the North Atlantic meridional overturning cir- culation. Geophysical Research Letters, 34, L23606. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031731 · DOI
  4. Broecker, W. S. (1991). The great ocean conveyor. Oceanography, 4, 79-89. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.1991. · DOI
  5. Cunningham, S. A., Roberts, C., Frajka-Williams, E., Johns, W. E., Hobbs, W., Palmer, M. D., et al. (2013). Atlantic MOC slowdown cooled the subtropical ocean. Geophysical Research Letters, 40, 6202-6207. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058464 · DOI
  6. Danabasoglu, G., Yaeger, S., Bailey, D., Behrens, E., Bentsen, M., Bi, D., et al. (2014). North Atlantic simulations in coordinated ocean-ice refer- ence experiments, phase II (CORE-II). Part I: Mean states. Ocean Modelling, 73, 76-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.10.005 · DOI
  7. Danabasoglu, G., Yeager, S. G., Kim, W. M., Behrens, E., Bentsen, M., Bi, D., et al. (2016). North Atlantic simulations in coordinated ocean-ice reference experiments phase II (CORE-II). Part II: Inter-annual to decadal variability. Ocean Modelling, 96, 65-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ocemod.2015.11.007 · DOI
  8. Dong, S., Goni, G., & Bringas, F. (2015). Temporal variability of the South Atlantic meridional overturning circulation between 20 S and 35 S. Geophysical Research Letters, 42, 7655-7662. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065603 · DOI
  9. Duchez, A., Frajka-Williams, E., Castro, N., Hirschi, J. J.-M., & Coward, A. (2014). Seasonal to interannual variability in density around the Canary Islands and their influence on the AMOC at 26 N. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 119, 1843-1860. https://doi.org/10. 1002/2013JC009416 · DOI
  10. Elipot, S., Frajka-Williams, E., Hughes, C., Olhede, S., & Lankhorst, M. (2017). Observed basin-scale response of the North Atlantic meridional overturning circulation to wind stress forcing. Journal of Climate, 30, 2029-2054. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0664. · DOI
  11. Elipot, S., Frajka-Williams, E., Hughes, C., & Willis, J. (2014). The observed North Atlantic MOC, its meridional coherence and ocean bottom pressure. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 44, 517-537. https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-13-026. · DOI
  12. Elipot, S., Hughes, C., Olhede, S., & Toole, J. (2013). Coherence of western boundary pressure at the RAPID WAVE array: Boundary wave adjust- ments or deep western boundary current advection? Journal of Physical Oceanography, 43, 744-765. https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-12-067. · DOI
  13. Emery, W. J., & Thomson, R. E. (2004). Data analysis methods in physical oceanography (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Elsevier.
  14. Frajka-Williams, E., Eriksen, C. C., Rhines, P. B., & Harcourt, R. R. (2011). Determining vertical velocities from Seaglider. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 28, 1641-1656. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JTECHO830. · DOI
  15. Frajka-Williams, E., Meinen, C. S., Johns, W. E., Smeed, D. A., Duchez, A. D., Lawrence, A. J., et al. (2016). Compensation between meridional flow components of the Atlantic MOC at 26 N. Ocean Science, 12, 481-493. https://doi.org/10.5194/os-12-481-2016 · DOI
  16. Kanzow, T. (2004). Monitoring the integrated deep meridional flow in the tropical North Atlantic (PhD thesis). Kiel, Germany: Christian- Albrechts-Universit.
  17. Kanzow, T., Cunningham, S. A., Johns, W. E., Hirschi, J. J.-M., Marotzke, J., Baringer, M. O., et al. (2010). Seasonal variability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation at 26:5 N. Journal of Climate, 23, 5678-5698. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3389. · DOI
  18. Kanzow, T., Send, U., Zenk, W., Rhein, M., & Chave, A. (2006). Monitoring the deep integrated meridional flow in the tropical North Atlantic: Long-term performance of a geostrophic array. Deep Sea Research, Part I, 53, 528-546. https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-12-067. · DOI
  19. Kelly, K. A., Thompson, L., & Lyman, J. (2014). The coherence and impact of meridional heat transport anomalies in the Atlantic Ocean inferred from observations. Journal of Climate, 27, 1469-1487. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00131. · DOI
  20. Landerer, F. W., Wiese, D. N., Bentel, K., Boening, C., & Watkins, M. M. (2015). North Atlantic meridional overturning circulation variations from GRACE ocean bottom pressure anomalies. Geophysical Research Letters, 42, 8114-8121. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065730 · DOI
  21. Lozier, M. S. (2010). Deconstructing the conveyor belt. Science, 328, 1507-1511. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189250 · DOI
  22. Lozier, M. S. (2012). Overturning in the North Atlantic. Annual Review of Marine Science, 4, 291-315. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev- marine-120710-100740 · DOI
  23. McCarthy, G. D., Smeed, D. A., Johns, W. E., Frajka-Williams, E., Moat, B. I., Rayner, D., et al. (2015). Measuring the Atlantic meridional over- turning circulation at 26 N. Progress in Oceanography, 130, 91-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2014.10.006 · DOI
  24. Mielke, C., Frajka-Williams, E., & Baehr, J. (2013). Observed and simulated variability of the AMOC at 26 N and 41 N. Geophysical Research Letters, 40, 1159-1164. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50233 · DOI
  25. Roberts, C. D., Jackson, L., & McNeall, D. (2014). Is the 2004-2012 reduction of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation significant? Geophysical Research Letters, 41, 3204-3210. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059473 · DOI
  26. Sinha, B., Smeed, D. A., McCarthy, G., Moat, B. I., Josey, S. A., Hirschi, J. J.-M., et al. (2018). The accuracy of estimates of the overturning circu- lation from basin wide mooring arrays. Progress in Oceanography, 160, 101-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2017.12.001 · DOI
  27. Smeed, D. A., McCarthy, G., Cunningham, S. A., Frajka-Williams, E., Rayner, D., Johns, W. E., et al. (2014). Observed decline of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation 2004 to 2012. Ocean Science, 10, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.5194/os-10-29-2014 · DOI
  28. Srokosz, M. A., & Bryden, H. L. (2015). Observing the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation yields a decade of inevitable surprises. Sci- ence, 348(6241), 1255575. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255575 · DOI
  29. Sveshnikov, A. (1968). Problems in probability theory, mathematical statistics and theory of random functions (481 p.). Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Company.
  30. Talley, L. D., Pickard, G. L., Emery, W. J., & Swift, J. H. (2011). Descriptive physical oceanography: An introduction (560 p.). Boston, MA: Elsevier.
  31. Toole, J. M., Curry, R. G., Joyce, T. M., McCartney, M., & Peña-Molino, B. (2011). Transport of the North Atlantic deep western boundary cur- rent about 39 N, 70 W: 2004-2008. Deep Sea Research Part II, 38, 1768-1780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.10.058 · DOI
  32. van Sebille, E., Baringer, M. O., Johns, W. E., Meinen, C. S., Beal, L. M., de Jong, M. F., et al. (2011). Propagation pathways of classical Labrader Sea water from its source region to 26 N. Journal of Geophysical Research, 116, C12027. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007171 · DOI
  33. Watts, D. R., & Kontoyiannis, H. (1990). Deep-ocean bottom pressure measurement: Drift removal and performance. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 7, 296-306. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1990)007<0296:DOBPMD>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  34. Willis, J. K., & Fu, L.-L. (2008). Combining altimeter and subsurface float data to estimate the time-averaged circulation in the upper ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, C12017. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004690 · DOI
  35. Zhang, R. (2010). Latitudinal dependence of Atlantic meridional overturning circulation variations. Geophysical Research Letters, 37, L16703. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044474 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • The tropical atlantic observing system

    Foltz, G. R., Brandt, P., Richter, I., Rodríguez-Fonseca, B., Hernandez, F., Dengler, M., Rodrigues, R. R., Schmidt, J. O., Yu, L., Lefevre, N., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00206 · Cited by 150 · see citing works

    “Since 2000, a mooring array has been maintained at 16◦N that includes velocity measurements covering the DWBC east of Guadeloupe and additional geostrophic moorings measuring the deep flow between the continental slope and the mid-Atlantic ridge (Send et al., 2011; Frajka-Williams et al., 2018).”
    Background

Authors
Frajka‐Williams, E., Lankhorst, M., Koelling, J., & Send, U.
Affiliations
  • Ocean and Earth Science University of Southampton Southampton UK
  • Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Published
2018-05
Volume
123
Issue
5
Pages
3427-3443
ISSN
  • 2169-9275 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-9291
OpenAlex
W2801369357
Cited by
33
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX16AO39H)
  • Natural Environment Research Council
  • National Science Foundation (OCE1332978)
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
Keywords
North Atlantic meridional overturning circulation, North Atlantic Deep Water, hydrographic changes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review