Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bayesian Inference of Subglacial Channel Structures From Water Pressure and Tracer‐Transit Time Data: A Numerical Study Based on a 2‐D Geostatistical Modeling Approach

Irarrazaval, Inigo, Werder, Mauro A., Linde, Niklas, Irving, James, Herman, Frederic, Mariethoz, Gregoire·2019·Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface

Abstract

Characterizing subglacial water flow is critical for understanding basal sliding and processes occurring under glaciers and ice sheets. Development of subglacial numerical models and acquisition of water pressure and tracer data have provided valuable insights into subglacial systems and their evolution. Despite these advances, numerical models, data conditioning, and uncertainty quantification are difficult, principally due to high number of unknown parameters and expensive forward computations. In this study, we aim to infer the properties of a subglacial drainage system in two dimensions using a framework that combines physical and geostatistical processes. The methodology is composed of three main components: (i) a channel generator to produce networks of the subglacial system, (ii) a physical model that computes water pressure and mass transport in steady state, and (iii) Bayesian inversion in which the outputs (pressure and tracer‐transit times) are compared with synthetic data, thus allowing for parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification. We evaluate the ability of this framework to infer the subglacial characteristics of a synthetic ice sheet produced by a physically complex deterministic model, under different recharge scenarios. Results show that our methodology captures expected physical characteristics for each meltwater supply condition, while the precise locations of channels remain difficult to constrain. The framework enables uncertainty quantification, and the results highlight its potential to infer properties of real subglacial systems using observed water pressure and tracer‐transit times.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2018jf004921

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199802)12:2<191::AID-HYP571>3.0.CO;2-C · DOI
  2. Benn D. I., 2010, Glaciers and glaciation
  3. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.02.009 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.032 · DOI
  5. 10.1017/aog.2016.3 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/ngeo1737 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/2015JF003705 · DOI
  8. Cornaton F., 2007, Ground water: A 3‐d ground water and surface water flow, mass transport and heat transfer finite element simulator
  9. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.027 · DOI
  10. Cuffey K. M., 2010, The physics of glaciers
  11. 10.1017/jog.2018.78 · DOI
  12. 10.1098/rspa.2014.0907 · DOI
  13. 10.1029/97RG03579 · DOI
  14. 10.1214/ss/1177011136 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1002/2016GL068337 · DOI
  16. 10.3189/2012JoG11J189 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/esp.3447 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.08.022 · DOI
  19. 10.3189/002214311796405951 · DOI
  20. 10.1023/A:1007506918588 · DOI
  21. 10.2516/ogst:2004011 · DOI
  22. 10.1017/S0022143000034894 · DOI
  23. 10.3189/172756507782202784 · DOI
  24. 10.1017/S0022143000011448 · DOI
  25. 10.1029/JB092iB09p09083 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/nature15385 · DOI
  27. 10.1029/2011WR010608 · DOI
  28. 10.1023/A:1007542406333 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.10.014 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.09.019 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.06.016 · DOI
  32. 10.1029/2010WR009274 · DOI
  33. 10.1029/94JB03097 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199610)10:10<1411::AID-HYP470>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
  35. 10.1017/S002214300001354X · DOI
  36. 10.1016/S0734-189X(84)80011-0 · DOI
  37. 10.5194/tc-12-2609-2018 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.04.024 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/gji/ggt482 · DOI
  40. 10.1017/S0022143000022188 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/nature09618 · DOI
  42. 10.5194/tc-8-959-2014 · DOI
  43. 10.1029/2009WR008933 · DOI
  44. 10.1029/2003JF000082 · DOI
  45. 10.5194/esurf-2-1-2014 · DOI
  46. 10.1086/627137 · DOI
  47. 10.1017/S002214300002219X · DOI
  48. 10.1029/96WR03137 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00251-8 · DOI
  50. 10.1007/s10040-012-0944-1 · DOI
  51. 10.1017/S0022143000012156 · DOI
  52. 10.1029/RG010i001p00287 · DOI
  53. 10.1002/jgrf.20146 · DOI
  54. 10.1002/hyp.8431 · DOI

Cited by

See all 7

Metadata

Authors
Irarrazaval, I., Werder, M. A., Linde, N., Irving, J., Herman, F., & Mariethoz, G.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, Faculty of Geosciences University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland
  • Laboratory of Hydraulics, Hydrology and Glaciology (VAW) ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland
  • Institute of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Geosciences University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
Published
2019-06
Volume
124
Issue
6
Pages
1625-1644
ISSN
  • 2169-9003
  • 2169-9011
Cited by
7
References
0
Language
en
Funders
Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian Inference of Subglacial Channel Structures From Water Pressure and Tracer‐Transit Time Data: A Numerical Study Based on a 2‐D Geostatistical Modeling Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2018jf004921
The paper
Irarrazaval, I., Werder, M. A., Linde, N., Irving, J., Herman, F., & Mariethoz, G. (2019). Bayesian Inference of Subglacial Channel Structures From Water Pressure and Tracer‐Transit Time Data: A Numerical Study Based on a 2‐D Geostatistical Modeling Approach. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jf004921

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.