The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High Climate Sensitivity in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2)
Open accessAbstract
The Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2) has an equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) of 5.3 K. ECS is an emergent property of both climate feedbacks and aerosol forcing. The increase in ECS over the previous version (CESM1) is the result of cloud feedbacks. Interim versions of CESM2 had a land model that damped ECS. Part of the ECS change results from evolving the model configuration to reproduce the long‐term trend of global and regional surface temperature over the twentieth century in response to climate forcings. Changes made to reduce sensitivity to aerosols also impacted cloud feedbacks, which significantly influence ECS. CESM2 simulations compare very well to observations of present climate. It is critical to understand whether the high ECS, outside the best estimate range of 1.5–4.5 K, is plausible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., & Meehl, G. A. (2012) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-11-00094.1 · Cited by 14,052
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., & Taylor, K. E. (2016) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016 · Cited by 11,981
Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness
Albrecht, B. A. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.245.4923.1227 · Cited by 4,422
IPCC (2007): Climate Change The Physical Science Basis
Solomon, S. (2007) · AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts · Cited by 3,476
The Community Earth System Model: A Framework for Collaborative Research
Hurrell, J. W., Holland, M. M., Gent, P. R., Ghan, S., Kay, J. E., Kushner, P. J., Lamarque, J.-F., Large, W. G., Lawrence, D., Lindsay, K., et al. (2013) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-12-00121.1 · Cited by 2,686
Self-citationKay, J. E., Deser, C., Phillips, A., Mai, A., Hannay, C., Strand, G., Arblaster, J. M., Bates, S. C., Danabasoglu, G., Edwards, J., et al. (2015) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-13-00255.1 · Cited by 2,493
Self-citationHoesly, R. M., Smith, S. J., Feng, L., Klimont, Z., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Pitkanen, T., Seibert, J. J., Vu, L., Andres, R. J., Bolt, R. M., et al. (2018) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018 · Cited by 2,203
Box, G. E. P. (1976) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1976.10480949 · Cited by 2,114
Lamarque, J.-F., Bond, T. C., Eyring, V., Granier, C., Heil, A., Klimont, Z., Lee, D., Liousse, C., Mieville, A., Owen, B., et al. (2010) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010 · Cited by 2,105 · cited 6×
“Using CMIP5 emissions (Lamarque et al., 2010) reduces ACI magnitude to −1.5 W/m2 (C6-CMIP5, cyan).”
InfluentialSelf-citationHansen, J., Sato, M., Ruedy, R., Nazarenko, L., Lacis, A., Schmidt, G. A., Russell, G., Aleinov, I., Bauer, M., Bauer, S., et al. (2005) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2005jd005776 · Cited by 1,486
Cited by
The Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2)
Danabasoglu, G., Lamarque, J. ‐., Bacmeister, J., Bailey, D. A., DuVivier, A. K., Edwards, J., Emmons, L. K., Fasullo, J., Garcia, R., Gettelman, A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2019ms001916 · Cited by 3,070
Self-citationCauses of Higher Climate Sensitivity in CMIP6 Models
Zelinka, M. D., Myers, T. A., McCoy, D. T., Po‐Chedley, S., Caldwell, P. M., Ceppi, P., Klein, S. A., & Taylor, K. E. (2020) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2019gl085782 · Cited by 1,747
Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Eyring, V., Flato, G., Lamarque, J.-F., Stouffer, R. J., Taylor, K. E., & Schlund, M. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba1981 · Cited by 823
Self-citationAdvances in understanding large‐scale responses of the water cycle to climate change
Allan, R. P., Barlow, M., Byrne, M. P., Cherchi, A., Douville, H., Fowler, H. J., Gan, T. Y., Pendergrass, A. G., Rosenfeld, D., Swann, A. L. S., et al. (2020) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.14337 · Cited by 687
Self-citationGISS‐E2.1: Configurations and Climatology
Kelley, M., Schmidt, G. A., Nazarenko, L. S., Bauer, S. E., Ruedy, R., Russell, G. L., Ackerman, A. S., Aleinov, I., Bauer, M., Bleck, R., et al. (2020) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2019ms002025 · Cited by 667
Metadata
- Authors
- Gettelman, A., Hannay, C., Bacmeister, J. T., Neale, R. B., Pendergrass, A. G., Danabasoglu, G., Lamarque, J. ‐., Fasullo, J. T., Bailey, D. A., Lawrence, D. M., & Mills, M. J.
- Venue
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2019-07-22
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 8329-8337
- ISSN
- 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8007
- OpenAlex
- W2960797162
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 29.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High Climate Sensitivity in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2019gl083978
- The paper
- Gettelman, A., Hannay, C., Bacmeister, J. T., Neale, R. B., Pendergrass, A. G., Danabasoglu, G., Lamarque, J. ‐., Fasullo, J. T., Bailey, D. A., Lawrence, D. M., & Mills, M. J. (2019). High Climate Sensitivity in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2). Geophysical Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gl083978
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
