The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of CMIP6 DECK Experiments With CNRM‐CM6‐1
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes the main characteristics of CNRM‐CM6‐1, the fully coupled atmosphere‐ocean general circulation model of sixth generation jointly developed by Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques (CNRM) and Cerfacs for the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6). The paper provides a description of each component of CNRM‐CM6‐1, including the coupling method and the new online output software. We emphasize where model's components have been updated with respect to the former model version, CNRM‐CM5.1. In particular, we highlight major improvements in the representation of atmospheric and land processes. A particular attention has also been devoted to mass and energy conservation in the simulated climate system to limit long‐term drifts. The climate simulated by CNRM‐CM6‐1 is then evaluated using CMIP6 historical and Diagnostic, Evaluation and Characterization of Klima (DECK) experiments in comparison with CMIP5 CNRM‐CM5.1 equivalent experiments. Overall, the mean surface biases are of similar magnitude but with different spatial patterns. Deep ocean biases are generally reduced, whereas sea ice is too thin in the Arctic. Although the simulated climate variability remains roughly consistent with CNRM‐CM5.1, its sensitivity to rising CO 2 has increased: the equilibrium climate sensitivity is 4.9 K, which is now close to the upper bound of the range estimated from CMIP5 models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., & Taylor, K. E. (2016) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016 · Cited by 11,981
The global climatology of an interannually varying air-sea flux data set.
Large, W. G., & Yeager, S. G. (2009) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-008-0441-3 · Cited by 1,636
Schneider, U., Becker, A., Finger, P., Meyer-Christoffer, A., Ziese, M., & Rudolf, B. (2014) · Theoretical and Applied Climatology · doi:10.1007/s00704-013-0860-x · Cited by 1,385
The ‘too few, too bright’ tropical low-cloud problem in CMIP5 models.
Nam, C., Bony, S., Dufresne, J. ‐., & Chepfer, H. (2012) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2012gl053421 · Cited by 375
Hourdin, F., Grandpeix, J.-Y., Rio, C., Bony, S., Jam, A., Cheruy, F., Rochetin, N., Fairhead, L., Idelkadi, A., Musat, I., et al. (2013) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-012-1343-y · Cited by 299
Self-citationClimate model biases in the eastern tropical oceans: causes, impacts and ways forward.
Richter, I. (2015) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.338 · Cited by 253
Cited by
Added value of CMIP6 over CMIP5 models in simulating Indian summer monsoon rainfall
Gusain, A., Ghosh, S., & Karmakar, S. (2020) · Atmospheric Research · doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104680 · Cited by 408
Constraining human contributions to observed warming since the pre-industrial period
Gillett, N. P., Kirchmeier-Young, M., Ribes, A., Shiogama, H., Hegerl, G. C., Knutti, R., Gastineau, G., John, J. G., Li, L., Nazarenko, L., et al. (2021) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-020-00965-9 · Cited by 265
Self-citationEmergent constraints on equilibrium climate sensitivity in CMIP5: do they hold for CMIP6?
Schlund, M., Lauer, A., Gentine, P., Sherwood, S. C., & Eyring, V. (2020) · Earth System Dynamics · doi:10.5194/esd-11-1233-2020 · Cited by 178
Evaluating stratospheric ozone and water vapour changes in CMIP6 models from 1850 to 2100
Keeble, J., Hassler, B., Banerjee, A., Checa-Garcia, R., Chiodo, G., Davis, S., Eyring, V., Griffiths, P. T., Morgenstern, O., Nowack, P., et al. (2021) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-21-5015-2021 · Cited by 170
Self-citationCouvreux, F., Hourdin, F., Williamson, D., Roehrig, R., Volodina, V., Villefranque, N., Rio, C., Audouin, O., Salter, J., Bazile, E., et al. (2021) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2020ms002217 · Cited by 121
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Voldoire, A., Saint‐Martin, D., Sénési, S., Decharme, B., Alias, A., Chevallier, M., Colin, J., Guérémy, J. ‐., Michou, M., Moine, M. ‐., Nabat, P., Roehrig, R., Salas y Mélia, D., Séférian, R., Valcke, S., Beau, I., Belamari, S., Berthet, S., Cassou, C., Cattiaux, J., Deshayes, J., Douville, H., Ethé, C., Franchistéguy, L., Geoffroy, O., Lévy, C., Madec, G., Meurdesoif, Y., Msadek, R., Ribes, A., Sanchez‐Gomez, E., Terray, L., & Waldman, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2177-2213
- ISSN
- 1942-2466 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2947991756
- Cited by
- 1,136
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 58.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of CMIP6 DECK Experiments With CNRM‐CM6‐1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2019ms001683
- The paper
- Voldoire, A., Saint‐Martin, D., Sénési, S., Decharme, B., Alias, A., Chevallier, M., Colin, J., Guérémy, J. ‐., Michou, M., Moine, M. ‐., Nabat, P., Roehrig, R., Salas y Mélia, D., Séférian, R., Valcke, S., Beau, I., Belamari, S., Berthet, S., Cassou, C., . . . Waldman, R. (2019). Evaluation of CMIP6 DECK Experiments With CNRM‐CM6‐1. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019ms001683
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
