CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 19

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Isolating Lithologic Versus Tectonic Signals of River Profiles to Test Orogenic Models for the Eastern and Southeastern Carpathians

Gailleton, B., Sinclair, H. D., Mudd, S. M., Graf, E. L. S., Mațenco, L. C.·2021·Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
DOI 10.1029/2020jf005970

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Fluvial morphology is affected by a wide range of forcing factors, which can be external, such as faulting and changes in climate, or internal, such as variations in rock hardness or degree of fracturing. It is a challenge to separate internal and external forcing factors when they are co‐located or occur coevally. Failure to account for both factors leads to potential misinterpretations. For example, steepening of channel network due to lithologic contrasts could be misinterpreted to be a function of increased tectonic displacements. These misinterpretations are enhanced over large areas, where landscape properties needed to calculate channel steepness (e.g., channel concavity) can vary significantly in space. In this study, we investigate relative channel steepness over the Eastern Carpathians, where it has been proposed that active rock uplift in the Southeastern Carpathians (SEC) gives way N‐ and NW‐wards to ca. 8 Myrs of post‐orogenic quiescence. We develop a technique to quantify relative channel steepness, the relative steepness index, based on a wide range of concavities, and show that the main signal shows an increase in relative steepness index from east to west across the range. Rock hardness measurements and geological studies suggest this difference is driven by lithology. When we isolate channel steepness by lithology to test for ongoing rock uplift along the range, we find steeper channels in the south of the study area compared to the same units in the North. This supports interpretations from longer timescale geological data that active rock uplift is fastest in the southern SEC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2020jf005970

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 143

  1. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz3166 · DOI
  2. 10.2475/ajs.268.3.243 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1017/9781316135754 · DOI
  5. 10.1130/B31067.1 · DOI
  6. 10.1029/98JB00505 · DOI
  7. 10.1029/96JB01344 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2018.02.004 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.03.005 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/978-94-011-3066-0_1 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s00531-007-0226-7 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.epsl.2019.04.034 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199602)21:2<125::AID-ESP511>3.0.CO;2-8 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.tecto.2009.07.027 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.tecto.2005.05.045 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.12.034 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.03.002 · DOI
  18. Campforts B., 2019, Lithology and orographic precipitation control river incision in the tropical Andes, Earth Surface Dynamics Discussions, 1
  19. 10.1038/s41586-019-1558-8 · DOI
  20. 10.5194/essd-10-2123-2018 · DOI
  21. Cristea A.‐I., 2014, Assessment of recent tectonic evolution and geomorphic response in SE Carpathians (Romania) using hypsometric analysis. GEOREVIEW: Scientific Annals of Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Geography Series, 24, 76
  22. Cristea A. I., 2015, Spatial analysis of channel steepness in a tectonically active region: Putna river catchment (South‐Eastern Carpathians), Geographia Technica, 10, 19
  23. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.08.023 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2004.02.033 · DOI
  25. de Lapparent A. A. C., 1907, Leçons de géographie physique
  26. 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.10.036 · DOI
  27. 10.1029/2003JF000086 · DOI
  28. 10.1029/2019JF005100 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/s41467-018-06238-6 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/joc.5086 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1016/j.tecto.2004.10.018 · DOI
  32. 10.1029/WR010i005p00969 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.04.026 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/esp.3947 · DOI
  35. 10.1130/B35128.1 · DOI
  36. Gailleton B. Goodwin G. C. H. &Auzemery A.(2020). Supplemental data table for isolating lithologic versus tectonic signals of river profiles to test orogenic models for the eastern and southeastern Carpathians.https://doi.org/10.7488/ds/2950 · DOI
  37. Gailleton B., 2021, Lsdtopotools/lsdtopytools: lsdtopytools
  38. 10.5194/esurf-7-211-2019 · DOI
  39. 10.1029/2017JF004252 · DOI
  40. 10.5962/bhl.title.51652 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/2016GL070451 · DOI
  42. 10.1144/SP298.9 · DOI
  43. 10.1002/esp.4477 · DOI
  44. 10.3133/pp294B · DOI
  45. Hack J. T., 1960, Interpretation of erosional topography in humid temperate regions, American Journal of Science, 258, 80
  46. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.05.035 · DOI
  47. 10.1002/esp.5075 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.tecto.2006.10.005 · DOI
  49. 10.5194/esurf-4-1-2016 · DOI
  50. 10.1130/0016-7606(1983)94<739:CCIB>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.epsl.2019.06.018 · DOI
  52. 10.1126/science.1241791 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.tecto.2012.01.016 · DOI
  54. 10.1007/s10950-006-9038-7 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.06.009 · DOI
  56. Joja T., 1968, Crystalline‐mesozoic and flysch Complexes of the east Carpathians (northern sector)
  57. 10.1029/2001JB000861 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1002/esp.3462 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/0012-821X(91)90220-C · DOI
  60. 10.1029/2001JB000359 · DOI
  61. Leever K. A., 2007, Foreland of the Romanian Carpathians, controls on late orogenic sedimentary basin evolution and Paratethys paleogeography (PhD)
  62. 10.1111/j.1365-2117.2006.00306.x · DOI
  63. 10.1002/hyp.10648 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.05.050 · DOI
  65. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02884.x · DOI
  66. 10.1007/978-3-319-32589-7_2 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.01.003 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/S0040-1951(99)00261-9 · DOI
  69. 10.1029/2006TC001951 · DOI
  70. 10.1111/j.1365-3121.2010.00931.x · DOI
  71. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.081 · DOI
  72. Melinte‐Dobrinescu M. C., 2008, Eastern Carpathian Cretaceous oceanic red beds: Lithofacies, biostratigraphy, and paleoenvironment, SEPM Special Publication, 111
  73. 10.1029/2009TC002550 · DOI
  74. 10.2478/v10096-009-0029-9 · DOI
  75. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.05.005 · DOI
  76. 10.1130/0016-7606(1962)73[1025:QGOSWI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  77. 10.1002/esp.3923 · DOI
  78. Mudd S. M., 2020, 91, 10.1016/B978-0-444-64177-9.00004-7 · DOI
  79. 10.1002/2013JF002981 · DOI
  80. 10.5194/esurf-6-505-2018 · DOI
  81. Necea D., 2010, High‐resolution morpho‐tectonic profiling across an orogen: Tectonic‐controlled geomorphology and multiple dating approach in the SE Carpathians (PhD)
  82. 10.1016/j.tecto.2013.02.039 · DOI · Paper page
  83. 10.1016/j.tecto.2005.05.047 · DOI
  84. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2021.103457 · DOI
  85. 10.1002/2017JF004250 · DOI
  86. 10.1002/esp.272 · DOI
  87. 10.1016/S0734-189X(84)80011-0 · DOI
  88. 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2013.10.004 · DOI
  89. 10.1016/S0040-1951(96)00263-6 · DOI
  90. 10.1130/G30013A.1 · DOI
  91. Peifer Bezerra D., 2018, The pattern and style of landscape evolution in post‐orogenic settings (PhD)
  92. Penck W., 1953, Morphological analysis of landforms: Translation of 1924 German book by H. Czech and K.C. Boxwell
  93. 10.5194/esurf-5-85-2017 · DOI
  94. 10.1002/esp.3302 · DOI
  95. Picotti V., 2008, A new active tectonic model for the construction of the Northern Apennines mountain front near Bologna (Italy), Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 113
  96. 10.1029/2017TC004779 · DOI
  97. 10.1016/j.tecto.2004.12.037 · DOI
  98. 10.1016/j.tecto.2008.03.017 · DOI
  99. 10.1007/978-3-319-32589-7_18 · DOI · Paper page
  100. 10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00194-0 · DOI
  101. 10.1007/PL00001096 · DOI
  102. 10.1002/2016JF004026 · DOI
  103. 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2017.04.001 · DOI
  104. 10.1002/jgrf.20031 · DOI
  105. 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.046 · DOI
  106. 10.1029/1998JB900046 · DOI
  107. Săndulescu M., 1984, Geotectonica româniei
  108. 10.1306/M45474C2 · DOI
  109. Săndulescu M., 1981, The structure of the East Carpathians (Moldavia‐Maramures area)
  110. Săndulescu M., 1981, Genetical and structural relations between flysch and molasse (The East Carpathians)
  111. 10.1002/2013JF002955 · DOI
  112. 10.1007/s00015-008-1247-3 · DOI
  113. Schmid S. M., 2019, Tectonic units of the Alpine collision zone between Eastern Alps and western Turkey, Gondwana Research
  114. Schmitt G., 2007, International Symposium on Strong Vrancea Earthquakes and Risk Mitigation
  115. 10.1130/B25364.1 · DOI
  116. 10.5194/esurf-5-821-2017 · DOI
  117. 10.1029/2018JF004885 · DOI
  118. 10.1002/9781444347166.ch26 · DOI
  119. 10.1029/90TC02507 · DOI
  120. 10.5194/esurf-7-681-2019 · DOI
  121. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.04.004 · DOI
  122. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.01.016 · DOI
  123. 10.5194/isprsarchives-XLI-B4-157-2016 · DOI · Paper page
  124. 10.1029/JB082i020p02905 · DOI
  125. 10.1029/2002TC001486 · DOI
  126. ter Borgh M. M., 2013, Connections between sedimentary basins during continental collision: How tectonic, surface and sedimentary processes shaped the paratethys (PhD)
  127. 10.1002/2015JF003771 · DOI
  128. 10.1046/j.1365-2117.1996.00238.x · DOI
  129. 10.1111/j.1365-2117.2012.00559.x · DOI
  130. 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.09.018 · DOI
  131. 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.09.012 · DOI
  132. 10.5194/esurf-5-145-2017 · DOI
  133. 10.1038/ngeo638 · DOI
  134. 10.1002/2016JF003973 · DOI
  135. 10.1029/1999JB900248 · DOI
  136. 10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0175:OSSIMB>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  137. 10.1126/science.1248765 · DOI
  138. 10.1016/S0025-3227(00)00024-4 · DOI
  139. 10.1029/2005JF000406 · DOI
  140. 10.1029/2005TC001935 · DOI
  141. Wobus C. W., 2006, Tectonics from topography: Procedures, promise, and pitfalls, Special Papers ‐ Geological Society of America, 398, 55
  142. 10.1002/2016JF004101 · DOI
  143. 10.1126/science.1182781 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gailleton, B., Sinclair, H. D., Mudd, S. M., Graf, E. L. S., & Mațenco, L. C.
Affiliations
  • School of GeoSciences University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
  • Department of Earth Sciences University of Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
Publisher
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Published
2021-08
Volume
126
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 2169-9003
  • 2169-9011
DOI
10.1029/2020jf005970
Cited by
19
References
1
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor, 8 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review