Cited by 22Groundwater flow and contamination studiesGroundwater and Isotope GeochemistryWater Quality and Resources Studies

Impact of Hydrostratigraphic Continuity on Brine‐to‐Freshwater Interface Dynamics: Implications From a Two‐Dimensional Parametric Study in an Arid and Endorheic Basin

McKnight, S. V., Boutt, D. F., Munk, L. A.·2021·Water Resources Research

Abstract

Despite the prevalence of density‐dependent flow systems in the brine‐rich aquifers of arid climates and coastal aquifers, the impact of realistic geologic conditions on interface geometry and density‐dependent time‐sensitive dynamics remains poorly constrained. Salar de Atacama provides an analog for exploring interface dynamics in arid regions. A site‐specific two‐dimensional hydrostratigraphic interpretation is used to examine the dynamics of the brine‐to‐freshwater interface. With the same simulation framework and core data, a separate parametric series of hydraulic conductivity distributions with varying horizontal continuity provides a mechanistic explanation for observed dynamics. Comparing modeled interfaces and their sensitivity to perturbations in recharge in each realization yields insight into interface dynamics coupled with horizontal continuity in subsurface heterogeneity. Recharge fluctuation is introduced to each distribution following the interface reaching a dynamic steady state. Metrics for results evaluation include interface slope geometry, interface width, migration length, and response rate. Analyses suggest that the average slope of the modeled interface shallows by 0.01 and 0.05 m ⋅ m −1 for an increase in continuity of highly permeable pathways by a factor of two and three, respectively. Increasing continuity also increases the overall response times and the variability in response. Results indicate that accurate representations of transient dynamics…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2020wr028302

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKnight, S. V., Boutt, D. F., & Munk, L. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • University of Alaska Anchorage (US)
Corresponding author
McKnight, S. V.
Venue
Water Resources Research
Published
2021-04
Volume
57
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7973
OpenAlex
W3039047400
Cited by
22
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Water Resources Research (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (EAR1443226)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Resources Studies
Keywords
density-dependent flow, subsurface heterogeneity, hydraulic conductivity distribution, saltwater intrusion, interfacial dynamics, Salar de Atacama, response time, interface width

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review