Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 179

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lithospheric extension near Lake Mead, Nevada: A model for ductile flow in the lower crust

Kruse, Sarah, McNutt, Marcia, Phipps‐Morgan, Jason, Royden, Leigh, Wernicke, Brian·1991·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

Small variations in gravity anomalies and topographic elevation observed in areas that have undergone highly variable amounts of upper crustal thinning can be satisfactorily explained by ductile flow of lower crustal material under the proper conditions. In this study we examine the boundary between the unextended Colorado Plateau and a strongly extended domain in the Basin and Range Province in the Lake Mead (Nevada) region. Bouguer gravity and topography data suggest that both present and preextensional variations in crustal thickness between the unextended and extended regions are small. Analytic channel flow models show that viscosities required for ductile flow in a lower crustal channel to reduce discontinuities in crustal thickness associated with variable amounts of extension are highly dependent on the channel thickness and on the length scale of flow required. Finite element modeling of Newtonian flow and power law creep shows that flow over the length scale of the eastern Basin and Range (500 km or more) corresponding to upper crustal extension by a factor of 1.4–3 over 10 m.y. requires effective viscosities less than 10 18–10 20 Pa s for ductile channels 10–25 km thick. Flow over shorter length scales (150 km) may be accommodated with effective viscosities as high as 10 21 Pa s. Modeling suggests that these effective viscosities may be sustained by lower crustal material deforming at laboratory‐derived power law creep rates. The longer‐scale flow may require elevated crustal temperatures (more than 700°C), depending on the composition and material properties assumed. Under the boundary conditions assumed in this study the linear viscous flow models yield a satisfactory approximation to deformation by power law creep. This work suggests that flow in the lower crust may be a viable mechanism for producing small variations in total crustal thickness between strongly extended and less extended regions, and thereby explaining the relative uniformity in gravity and topography between such regions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/90jb02621

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 179

Metadata

Authors
Kruse, S., McNutt, M., Phipps‐Morgan, J., Royden, L., & Wernicke, B.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
1991-03-10
Volume
96
Issue
B3
Pages
4435-4456
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145803736
Cited by
179
References
1
FWCI
16.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lithospheric extension near Lake Mead, Nevada: A model for ductile flow in the lower crust. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/90jb02621
The paper
Kruse, S., McNutt, M., Phipps‐Morgan, J., Royden, L., & Wernicke, B. (1991). Lithospheric extension near Lake Mead, Nevada: A model for ductile flow in the lower crust. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/90jb02621

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.