The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Crustal channel flows: 1. Numerical models with applications to the tectonics of the Himalayan‐Tibetan orogen
Abstract
Plane strain, thermal‐mechanical numerical models are used to examine the development of midcrustal channel flows in large hot orogens. In the models, radioactive self‐heating reduces the viscosity of tectonically thickened crust and increases its susceptibility to large‐scale horizontal flow. Channels can be exhumed and exposed by denudation focused on the high‐relief transition between plateau and foreland. We interpret the Himalaya to have evolved in this manner. Channel flows are poorly developed if the channel has a ductile rheology based on wet quartz flow laws, and well developed if there is an additional reduction in viscosity to 10 19 Pa s. This reduction occurs from 700°C to 750°C in the models and is attributed to a small percentage of in situ partial melt (“melt weakening”). Model HT1 provides an internally consistent explanation for the tectonic evolution of many features of the Himalayan‐Tibetan orogenic system. Erosional exhumation exposes the migmatitic channel, equivalent to the Greater Himalayan Sequence (GHS), between coeval normal and thrust sense ductile shear zones, corresponding to the South Tibetan Detachment and the Main Central Thrust systems. Outward flow of unstable upper crust rotates these shears to low dip angles. In the model both the GHS and the Lesser Himalayan Sequence are derived from Indian crust, with the latter from much farther south. Similar models exhibit a range of tectonic styles, including the formation of domes resembling north Himalayan gneiss domes. Model results are relatively insensitive to channel heterogeneities and to variations in the behavior of the mantle lithosphere beneath the model plateau.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In numerical models with focused erosion at the orogen margin, an orogenic plateau develops in the hinterland owing to widespread partial melting in the midcrust and lower crust after about 30 My of collision.
“In numerical models with focused erosion at the orogen margin, an orogenic plateau develops in the hinterland owing to widespread partial melting in the midcrust and lower crust after about 30 My of collision.”
From Grenville Front zone, Gagnon terrane, southwestern Labrador: Configuration of a midcrustal foreland fold‐thrust belt (2008) · cites this paper as Beaumont et al., 2004
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beaumont, C., Jamieson, R. A., Nguyen, M. H., & Lee, B. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/414738a · Cited by 1,632
Self-citationThe steady state thermal structure of eroding orogenic belts and accretionary prisms
Royden, L. H. (1993) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/92jb01954 · Cited by 162
Ablative subduction: A two-sided alternative to the conventional subduction model
Tao, W. C., & O'connell, R. J. (1992) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/91jb02422 · Cited by 107
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 68
- Beaumont C., 2001, Slave ‐ Northern Cordillera Lithospheric Evolution (SNORCLE) and Cordilleran Tectonics Workshop; Report of 2001 Combined Meeting, 112
- 10.1029/JB083iB10p04975 · DOI
- 10.1029/91JB00370 · DOI
- 10.1029/TC009i004p00557 · DOI
- 10.1130/0091-7613(1985)13<679:NEWTCH>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1029/2000JB900092 · DOI
- 10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<703:TOBTEM>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1016/0012-821X(94)90143-0 · DOI
- 10.1029/2001TC001322 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsta.1988.0135 · DOI
- 10.1029/JB091iB03p03664 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1995.tb05908.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0040-1951(95)00011-B · DOI
- 10.1016/0040-1951(96)00074-1 · DOI
- 10.1029/2001TC001305 · DOI
- 10.1029/98TC01314 · DOI
- 10.1130/0016-7606(2000)112<324:TOTHAS>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1029/2001TC001281 · DOI
- 10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<67:CCAMSF>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1029/JB086iB07p06115 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.0263-4929.2001.00357.x · DOI
- 10.1029/2003JB002811 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0012-8252(02)00071-5 · DOI
- 10.1130/0016-7606(2000)112<375:NOTMSC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1029/2001JB000861 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2475/ajs.302.9.749 · DOI
- 10.1029/90JB02621 · DOI
- 10.1029/1999TC001147 · DOI
- Lee J., 2001, Cooling history in Mabja dome, southern Tibet: Implications for the tectonic evolution of the north Himalayan gneiss domes, Eos Trans. AGU, 82
- 10.1007/978-3-642-59617-9_3 · DOI
- 10.1029/92TC01566 · DOI
- 10.1029/97JB02671 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00578-7 · DOI
- Medvedev S., 2001, Models for mid and lower crustal channel flows, Eos Trans. AGU, 82
- 10.1029/93RG02030 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00280-2 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.274.5293.1684 · DOI
- 10.1038/387037a0 · DOI
- Platt J. P., 1993, Convective removal of lithosphere beneath mountain belts: Thermal and mechanical consequences, Am. J. Sci., 293, 307
- 10.1130/0091-7613(1998)026<0511:TMMFCT>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
- Ranalli G., 1987, Rheology of the Earth
- Robyr M., 2001, Thrusting, extension, and doming during the polyphase tectono‐metamorphic evolution of the High Himalayan crystalline sequence in SE Zanskar and NW Lahul, J. Asian Earth Sci., 19, 52
- Rowley D. B., 2002, Cenozoic paleoaltimetry and paleohypsometry of the Himalaya and Tibet plateau, Geol. Assoc. Can. Abstr. Programs, 34, 472
- 10.1029/96JB00951 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.276.5313.788 · DOI
- Searle M. P., 1996, Tectonics of Asia, 110
- 10.1029/2000JB900389 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature01356 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1525-1314.2000.00277.x · DOI
- Talbot C. J., 2000, Salt, Shale, and Igneous Diapirs in and Around Europe, 93
- 10.1126/science.1082777 · DOI
- Turcotte D. L., 1982, Geodynamics: Applications of Continuum Physics to Geological Problems
- 10.1016/S0012-821X(99)00131-4 · DOI
- Vanderhaeghe O., 1999, Eastern Canadian Shield Onshore‐Offshore Transect (ECSOOT): Report of 1999 Transect Meeting, 44
- 10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01861.x · DOI
- 10.1017/S0016756801005313 · DOI
- 10.1029/2000TC001249 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1063647 · DOI
- 10.1029/96JB02482 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-94-009-0675-4_21 · DOI
- 10.1029/95JB01310 · DOI
- 10.1029/1999JB900248 · DOI
- 10.1038/369642a0 · DOI
- 10.1130/0091-7613(1993)021<0371:MMFTTO>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1130/G19730.1 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.earth.28.1.211 · DOI
- 10.1130/1052-5173(2001)011<0004:EHGATG>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1029/TC006i004p00489 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
van Gool, J. A. M., Rivers, T., & Calon, T. (2008) · Tectonics · doi:10.1029/2006tc002095 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Beaumont, C., Jamieson, R. A., Nguyen, M. H., & Medvedev, S.
- Affiliations
- Department of Oceanography Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
- Department of Earth Sciences Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- B6
- ISSN
- 0148-0227
- Cited by
- 563
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review