The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Geology and distribution of impact craters on Venus: What are they telling us?
Abstract
Magellan has revealed an ensemble of impact craters on Venus that is unique in many important ways. We have compiled a data base describing the 842 craters on 89% of Venus' surface mapped through orbit 2578. (The craters range in diameter from 1.5 to 280 km.) We have studied the distribution, size‐density, morphology, geology, and associated surface properties of these craters both in the aggregate and, for some craters, in greater detail. We find that (1) the spatial distribution of craters is highly uniform; (2) the size‐density distribution of large craters (diameters ≥35 km) is similar to the young crater populations on other terrestrial planets but at a much lower density that indicates an average age of only about 0.5 Ga (based on the estimated population of Venus‐crossing asteroids); (3) unlike the case on other planets, the density of small craters (diameters ≤35 km) declines rapidly with decreasing diameters because of atmospheric filtering; (4) the spectrum of crater modification differs greatly from that on other planets: 62% of all craters are pristine, only 4% are embayed by lavas, and the remainder are affected by tectonism, but none are severely and progressively depleted (as extrapolated from the size‐density distribution of larger craters); (5) large craters have a progression of morphologies generally similar to those on other planets, but small craters are typically irregular or multiple rather than bowl shaped; (6) diffuse radar‐bright or ‐dark features surround some craters, and 367 similar diffuse “splotches” with no central crater are observed; and (7) other crater features unique to Venus include radar‐bright or ‐dark parabolic arcs opening westward and extensive outflows originating in crater ejecta. The first three of these observations are entirely unexpected. We interpret them as indicating that the planet's cratering record was erased by a global resurfacing event or events, the latest ending about 0.5 Ga, after which volcanic activity declined (but did not cease entirely). Since the last resurfacing event, a maximum of 10% of the planet has been resurfaced and only about 4% of the craters have been obliterated. Convective thermal evolution models support this interpretation (Arkani‐Hamed and Toksoz, 1984). Observations 3–7 confirm quantitatively the expectation that the dense atmosphere of Venus has strongly affected the production of craters. Large impactors have been relatively unaffected, intermediate‐sized ones have been fragmented and have produced overlapping or multiple craters, a narrow size range has produced shock‐induced “splotches” but no craters, and the smallest bodies have had no observable effect on the surface. The number of craters eliminated by the “atmospheric filter” is enormous, about 98% of the craters between 2 and 35 km in diameter that Magellan might have observed on a hypothetical airless Venus. Unique crater‐related features such as parabolas and outflow deposits demonstrate the roles of Venus' high atmospheric density and temperature in modifying the crater formation process. Finally, heavily fractured craters and lava‐embayed craters are found to have higher than average densities along the major fracture belts and rifted uplands connecting Aphrodite Terra and Atla, Beta, Themis, and Phoebe regiones. These craters thus provide physical evidence for recent volcanic and tectonic activity at a low level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Impact and Explosion Cratering
Runcorn, S. K. (1984) · Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors · doi:10.1016/0031-9201(84)90073-6 · Cited by 1,314
The geologic history of the Moon
Wilhelms, D. E., McCauley, J. F., & Trask, N. J. (1987) · Professional Paper · doi:10.3133/pp1348 · Cited by 1,089
Shock metamorphism of natural materials
Dickey, J. S. (1969) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(69)90051-9 · Cited by 527
Head, J. W., Crumpler, L. S., Aubele, J. C., Guest, J. E., & Saunders, R. S. (1992) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/92je01273 · Cited by 479
Standard techniques for presentation and analysis of crater size-frequency data
(1979) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/0019-1035(79)90009-5 · Cited by 455
Rheological Properties of Magmas
McBirney, A. R., & Murase, T. (1984) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev.ea.12.050184.002005 · Cited by 357
Baldwin, R. B. (1963) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · Cited by 343
Geologic map of the near side of the Moon
(1971) · doi:10.3133/i703 · Cited by 247
Moon: Origin and evolution of multi-ring basins
Hartmann, W. K., & Wood, C. A. (1971) · The Moon · doi:10.1007/bf00620390 · Cited by 227
Atmospheric effects on Martian Ejecta Emplacement
Schultz, P. H., & Gault, D. E. (1979) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb084ib13p07669 · Cited by 209
Cited by
Composition of the Continental Crust
Rudnick, R. L., & Gao, S. (2014) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-095975-7.00301-6 · Cited by 5,691
Composition of the Continental Crust
Rudnick, R. L., & Gao, S. (2003) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b0-08-043751-6/03016-4 · Cited by 3,413
Moresi, L., & Solomatov, V. (1998) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1046/j.1365-246x.1998.00521.x · Cited by 644
The global resurfacing of Venus
Strom, R. G., Schaber, G. G., & Dawson, D. D. (1994) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/94je00388 · Cited by 400
Self-citationCockell, C. S., Bush, T., Bryce, C., Direito, S., Fox-Powell, M., Harrison, J. P., Lammer, H., Landenmark, H., Martin-Torres, J., Nicholson, N., et al. (2016) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2015.1295 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Schaber, G. G., Strom, R. G., Moore, H. J., Soderblom, L. A., Kirk, R. L., Chadwick, D. J., Dawson, D. D., Gaddis, L. R., Boyce, J. M., & Russell, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1992-08-25
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- E8
- Pages
- 13257-13301
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077395178
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 46.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geology and distribution of impact craters on Venus: What are they telling us? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/92je01246
- The paper
- Schaber, G. G., Strom, R. G., Moore, H. J., Soderblom, L. A., Kirk, R. L., Chadwick, D. J., Dawson, D. D., Gaddis, L. R., Boyce, J. M., & Russell, J. (1992). Geology and distribution of impact craters on Venus: What are they telling us? Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. https://doi.org/10.1029/92je01246
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.