The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coccolithophorid blooms in the global ocean
Open accessAbstract
The global distribution pattern of coccolithophorid blooms was mapped in order to ascertain the prevalence of these blooms in the world's oceans and to estimate their worldwide production of CaCO 3 and dimethyl sulfide (DMS). Mapping was accomplished by classifying pixels of 5‐day global composites of coastal zone color scanner imagery into bloom and nonbloom classes using a supervised, multispectral classification scheme. Surface waters with the spectral signature of coccolithophorid blooms annually covered an average of 1.4×10 6 km 2 in the world oceans from 1979 to 1985, with the subpolar latitudes accounting for 71% of this surface area. Classified blooms were most extensive in the Subarctic North Atlantic. Large expanses of the bloom signal were also detected in the North Pacific, on the Argentine shelf and slope, and in numerous lower latitude marginal seas and shelf regions. The greatest spatial extent of classified blooms in subpolar oceanic regions occurred in the months from summer to early autumn, while those in lower latitude marginal seas occurred in midwinter to early spring. Though the classification scheme was efficient in separating bloom and nonbloom classes during test simulations, and biogeographical literature generally confirms the resulting distribution pattern of blooms in the subpolar regions, the cause of the bloom signal is equivocal in some geographic areas, particularly on shelf regions at lower latitudes. Standing stock estimates suggest that the presumed Emiliania huxleyi blooms act as a significant source of calcite carbon and DMS sulfur on a regional scale. On a global scale, however, the satellite‐detected coccolithophorid blooms are estimated to play only a minor role in the annual production of these two compounds and their flux from the surface mixed layer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate
Charlson, R. J., Lovelock, J. E., Andreae, M. O., & Warren, S. G. (1987) · Nature · doi:10.1038/326655a0 · Cited by 4,305
Müller‐Karger, F. E., Walsh, J. J., Evans, R. H., & Meyers, M. B. (1991) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/91jc00787 · Cited by 252
Cited by
HOW MANY SPECIES OF ALGAE ARE THERE?
Guiry, M. D. (2012) · Journal of Phycology · doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.2012.01222.x · Cited by 1,002
Antoine, D., André, J., & Morel, A. (1996) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/95gb02832 · Cited by 911
Upper ocean ecosystem dynamics and iron cycling in a global three-dimensional model
Moore, J. K., Doney, S. C., & Lindsay, K. (2004) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2004gb002220 · Cited by 889
Stumpf, R. P., Culver, M. E., Tester, P. A., Tomlinson, M., Kirkpatrick, G. J., Pederson, B. A., Truby, E., Ransibrahmanakul, V., & Soracco, M. (2003) · Harmful Algae · doi:10.1016/s1568-9883(02)00083-5 · Cited by 357
Decreasing marine biogenic calcification: A negative feedback on rising atmospheric p CO 2
Zondervan, I., Zeebe, R. E., Rost, B., & Riebesell, U. (2001) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2000gb001321 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, C. W., & Yoder, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1994-04-15
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- C4
- Pages
- 7467-7482
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999308740
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coccolithophorid blooms in the global ocean. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/93jc02156
- The paper
- Brown, C. W., & Yoder, J. A. (1994). Coccolithophorid blooms in the global ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/93jc02156
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.