The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Potential distribution of methane hydrates in the world's oceans
Abstract
Estimates of the magnitudes and spatial distribution of potential oceanic methane hydrate reservoirs have been made from pressure‐temperature phase relations and a plausible range of thermal gradients, sediment porosities, and pore fillings taken from published sources, based on two major theories of gas hydrate formation (1) in situ bacterial production and (2) pore fluid expulsion models. The implications of these two models on eventual atmospheric methane release, due to global warming, are briefly examined. The calculated range of methane volumes in oceanic gas hydrates is 26.4 to 139.1 × 10 15 m 3, with the most likely value on the lower end of this range. The results for the bacterial model show a preferential distribution of hydrates at mid‐ to high latitudes, with an equatorial enhancement in the case of the fluid migration model. The latter model also generates a deeper and thicker hydrate stability zone at most latitudes than does the former. Preliminary results suggest that the hydrate distribution predicted by the fluid migration model may be more consistent with observations. However, this preliminary finding is based on a very limited sample size, and there are high uncertainties in the assumptions. The volume of methane hydrate within the uppermost l m of the hydrate stability zone and within 1°‐2°C of the equilibrium curve, assuming in situ bacterial generation, is 0.93–6.32 × 10 12 m 3, or 0.0035–0.012% of the maximal estimated hydrate reservoir. Nevertheless this volume, if released uniformly over the next 100 years, is comparable to current CH 4 release rates for several important CH 4 sources. Corresponding CH 4 volumes calculated using the fluid migration model are nearly 2 orders of magnitude lower.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climatological Atlas of the World Ocean
Levitus, S. (1983) · Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union · doi:10.1029/eo064i049p00962-02 · Cited by 3,078
von Huene, R., & Scholl, D. W. (1991) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/91rg00969 · Cited by 1,283
Cited by
Sensitivity of the carbon cycle in the Arctic to climate change
McGuire, A. D., Anderson, L. G., Christensen, T. R., Dallimore, S., Guo, L., Hayes, D. J., Heimann, M., Lorenson, T. D., Macdonald, R. W., & Roulet, N. (2009) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/08-2025.1 · Cited by 984
Man and the Last Great Wilderness: Human Impact on the Deep Sea
Ramirez-Llodra, E., Tyler, P. A., Baker, M. C., Bergstad, O. A., Clark, M. R., Escobar, E., Levin, L. A., Menot, L., Rowden, A. A., Smith, C. R., et al. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022588 · Cited by 850
Methane Feedbacks to the Global Climate System in a Warmer World
Dean, J. F., Middelburg, J. J., Röckmann, T., Aerts, R., Blauw, L. G., Egger, M., Jetten, M. S. M., de Jong, A. E. E., Meisel, O. H., Rasigraf, O., et al. (2018) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1002/2017rg000559 · Cited by 630
Global Distribution of Methane Hydrate in Ocean Sediment
Klauda, J. B., & Sandler, S. I. (2005) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef049798o · Cited by 573
Potential effects of gas hydrate on human welfare
Kvenvolden, K. A. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.7.3420 · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Gornitz, V., & Fung, I.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 335-347
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W2136375698
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Potential distribution of methane hydrates in the world's oceans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/94gb00766
- The paper
- Gornitz, V., & Fung, I. (1994). Potential distribution of methane hydrates in the world's oceans. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/94gb00766
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.