Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 222

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Potential distribution of methane hydrates in the world's oceans

Gornitz, V., Fung, I.·1994·Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Abstract

Estimates of the magnitudes and spatial distribution of potential oceanic methane hydrate reservoirs have been made from pressure‐temperature phase relations and a plausible range of thermal gradients, sediment porosities, and pore fillings taken from published sources, based on two major theories of gas hydrate formation (1) in situ bacterial production and (2) pore fluid expulsion models. The implications of these two models on eventual atmospheric methane release, due to global warming, are briefly examined. The calculated range of methane volumes in oceanic gas hydrates is 26.4 to 139.1 × 10 15 m 3, with the most likely value on the lower end of this range. The results for the bacterial model show a preferential distribution of hydrates at mid‐ to high latitudes, with an equatorial enhancement in the case of the fluid migration model. The latter model also generates a deeper and thicker hydrate stability zone at most latitudes than does the former. Preliminary results suggest that the hydrate distribution predicted by the fluid migration model may be more consistent with observations. However, this preliminary finding is based on a very limited sample size, and there are high uncertainties in the assumptions. The volume of methane hydrate within the uppermost l m of the hydrate stability zone and within 1°‐2°C of the equilibrium curve, assuming in situ bacterial generation, is 0.93–6.32 × 10 12 m 3, or 0.0035–0.012% of the maximal estimated hydrate reservoir. Nevertheless this volume, if released uniformly over the next 100 years, is comparable to current CH 4 release rates for several important CH 4 sources. Corresponding CH 4 volumes calculated using the fluid migration model are nearly 2 orders of magnitude lower.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/94gb00766

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 222

Metadata

Authors
Gornitz, V., & Fung, I.
Venue
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Published
1994-09
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
335-347
ISSN
  • 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9224
OpenAlex
W2136375698
Cited by
222
References
2
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Potential distribution of methane hydrates in the world's oceans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/94gb00766
The paper
Gornitz, V., & Fung, I. (1994). Potential distribution of methane hydrates in the world's oceans. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/94gb00766

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.