Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 372

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toward a global estimate of black carbon in residues of vegetation fires representing a sink of atmospheric CO2and a source of O2

Kuhlbusch, T. A. J., Crutzen, P. J.·1995·Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Abstract

Vegetation fire residues of various kinds of plant materials were analyzed for black carbon (BC) and the corresponding hydrogen. These data clearly show that BC can be defined as the fire produced carbon fraction with a molar H/C ratio of ≤ 0.2 which is resistant to heating to 340°C in pure oxygen. Relationships of black carbon production to fire characteristics such as fuel type, gaseous emissions, etc., were studied demonstrating that black carbon is mainly a product of the hot flaming combustion and that more than 80% of the black carbon produced remains on ground after the fire with the rest being emitted with the smoke. This black carbon mainly in the fine residue may significantly contribute to the background concentrations of black carbon in the atmosphere. From the ratios of black carbon in the residue to carbon exposed to the fire, and to carbon emitted as CO 2 we estimate the global black carbon formation to be 50–270 Tg yr−l(teragram = 10 12 g). As this carbon is very resistant to microbial decay, it may well represent a sink for biospheric carbon. This sink may be significantly greater, for example, up to a factor of 2 when reducing the pretreatment temperature to 300°C, if some of the less resistant carbon with higher H/C ratios which is removed by our method would also show significant resistance to microbial breakdown. The fire‐induced sequestration of carbon from the short‐term biospheric to the long‐term geological cycle due to the formation of black carbon may represent a significant sink of atmospheric CO 2 and source of O 2 and possibly has influenced today's atmospheric oxygen content.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/95gb02742

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 372

Metadata

Authors
Kuhlbusch, T. A. J., & Crutzen, P. J.
Venue
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Published
1995-12
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
491-501
ISSN
  • 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9224
OpenAlex
W2090140753
Cited by
372
References
2
FWCI
7.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward a global estimate of black carbon in residues of vegetation fires representing a sink of atmospheric CO2and a source of O2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/95gb02742
The paper
Kuhlbusch, T. A. J., & Crutzen, P. J. (1995). Toward a global estimate of black carbon in residues of vegetation fires representing a sink of atmospheric CO2and a source of O2. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/95gb02742

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.