The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward a global estimate of black carbon in residues of vegetation fires representing a sink of atmospheric CO2and a source of O2
Abstract
Vegetation fire residues of various kinds of plant materials were analyzed for black carbon (BC) and the corresponding hydrogen. These data clearly show that BC can be defined as the fire produced carbon fraction with a molar H/C ratio of ≤ 0.2 which is resistant to heating to 340°C in pure oxygen. Relationships of black carbon production to fire characteristics such as fuel type, gaseous emissions, etc., were studied demonstrating that black carbon is mainly a product of the hot flaming combustion and that more than 80% of the black carbon produced remains on ground after the fire with the rest being emitted with the smoke. This black carbon mainly in the fine residue may significantly contribute to the background concentrations of black carbon in the atmosphere. From the ratios of black carbon in the residue to carbon exposed to the fire, and to carbon emitted as CO 2 we estimate the global black carbon formation to be 50–270 Tg yr−l(teragram = 10 12 g). As this carbon is very resistant to microbial decay, it may well represent a sink for biospheric carbon. This sink may be significantly greater, for example, up to a factor of 2 when reducing the pretreatment temperature to 300°C, if some of the less resistant carbon with higher H/C ratios which is removed by our method would also show significant resistance to microbial breakdown. The fire‐induced sequestration of carbon from the short‐term biospheric to the long‐term geological cycle due to the formation of black carbon may represent a significant sink of atmospheric CO 2 and source of O 2 and possibly has influenced today's atmospheric oxygen content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Contrains on the Global Atmospheric Co 2 Budget
Tans, P. P., Fung, I. Y., & Takahashi, T. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.247.4949.1431 · Cited by 2,066
Determination of atmospheric soot carbon with a simple thermal method
Cachier, H., Bremond, M.-P., & Buat-Ménard, P. (1989) · Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology · doi:10.3402/tellusb.v41i3.15095 · Cited by 339
Cited by
Glaser, B., Lehmann, J., & Zech, W. (2002) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/s00374-002-0466-4 · Cited by 2,890
Lehmann, J., Pereira da Silva, J., Steiner, C., Nehls, T., Zech, W., & Glaser, B. (2003) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1022833116184 · Cited by 1,878
Chen, B., Zhou, D., & Zhu, L. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es8002684 · Cited by 1,823
Review of the stability of biochar in soils: predictability of O:C molar ratios
Spokas, K. A. (2010) · Carbon Management · doi:10.4155/cmt.10.32 · Cited by 1,160
Oxidation of black carbon by biotic and abiotic processes
Cheng, C.-H., Lehmann, J., Thies, J. E., Burton, S. D., & Engelhard, M. H. (2006) · Organic Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.orggeochem.2006.06.022 · Cited by 1,129
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuhlbusch, T. A. J., & Crutzen, P. J.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 491-501
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W2090140753
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward a global estimate of black carbon in residues of vegetation fires representing a sink of atmospheric CO2and a source of O2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/95gb02742
- The paper
- Kuhlbusch, T. A. J., & Crutzen, P. J. (1995). Toward a global estimate of black carbon in residues of vegetation fires representing a sink of atmospheric CO2and a source of O2. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/95gb02742
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.