The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon dioxide exchange in a peatland ecosystem
Abstract
Micrometeorological measurements of carbon dioxide exchange were made in an open peatland in north central Minnesota during two growing seasons (1991 and 1992). The vegetation at the site was dominated by Sphagnum papillosum, Scheuchzeria palustris, and Chamaedaphne calyculata. The objective of the study was to examine the diurnal and seasonal variations in canopy photosynthesis (P) and develop information on the net ecosystem CO 2 exchange. The two seasons provided contrasting microclimatic conditions: as compared with 1991, the 1992 season was significantly wetter and cooler. Canopy photosynthesis was sensitive to changes in light, temperature, and moisture stress (as indicated by water table depth and atmospheric vapor pressure deficit). Under moderate conditions (temperature 18–28°C, vapor pressure deficit 0.7–1.5 kPa, and water table near the surface) during the peak growth period, midday (averaged between 1000–1400 hours) P values ranged from 0.15 to 0.24 mg m−2 s−1. Under high‐temperature (30°–34°C) and moisture stress (water table 0.16–0.23 m below the surface and vapor pressure deficit 2.2–3.0 kPa) conditions, midday P was reduced to about 0.03–0.06 mg m−2 s−1. There was a high degree of consistency in the values of P under similar conditions in the two seasons. Seasonally integrated values of the daily net ecosystem CO 2 exchange indicated that the study site was a source of atmospheric CO 2, releasing about 71 g C m−2 over a 145‐day period (May‐October) in 1991. Over a similar period in 1992, however, this ecosystem was a sink for atmospheric CO 2 with a net accumulation of about 32 g C m−2. These results are consistent with previous investigations on CO 2 exchange in other northern wetland sites during wet and dry periods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Contrains on the Global Atmospheric Co 2 Budget
Tans, P. P., Fung, I. Y., & Takahashi, T. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.247.4949.1431 · Cited by 2,066
Cited by
Contemporary carbon balance and late Holocene carbon accumulation in a northern peatland
ROULET, N. T., LAFLEUR, P. M., RICHARD, P. J. H., MOORE, T. R., HUMPHREYS, E. R., & BUBIER, J. (2007) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01292.x · Cited by 677
Carbon cycling in peatlands A review of processes and controls
Blodau, C. (2002) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/a02-004 · Cited by 400
Effects of nutrient addition on vegetation and carbon cycling in an ombrotrophic bog
BUBIER, J. L., MOORE, T. R., & BLEDZKI, L. A. (2007) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01346.x · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Shurpali, N. J., Verma, S. B., Kim, J., & Arkebauer, T. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1995-07-20
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- D7
- Pages
- 14319-14326
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030352089
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon dioxide exchange in a peatland ecosystem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/95jd01227
- The paper
- Shurpali, N. J., Verma, S. B., Kim, J., & Arkebauer, T. J. (1995). Carbon dioxide exchange in a peatland ecosystem. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/95jd01227
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.