The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of nutrient addition on vegetation and carbon cycling in an ombrotrophic bog
Abstract
We measured net ecosystem CO 2 exchange (NEE), plant biomass and growth, species composition, peat microclimate, and litter decomposition in a fertilization experiment at Mer Bleue Bog, Ottawa, Ontario. The bog is located in the zone with the highest atmospheric nitrogen deposition for Canada, estimated at 0.8–1.2 g N m−2 yr−1(wet deposition as NH 4 and NO 3). To establish the effect of nutrient addition on this ecosystem, we fertilized the bog with six treatments involving the application of 1.6–6 g N m−2 yr−1(as NH 4 NO 3), with and without P and K, in triplicate 3 m × 3 m plots. The initial 5–6 years have shown a loss of first Sphagnum, then Polytrichum mosses, and an increase in vascular plant biomass and leaf area index. Analyses of NEE, measured in situ with climate‐controlled chambers, indicate that contrary to expectations, the treatments with the highest levels of nutrient addition showed lower rates of maximum NEE and gross photosynthesis, but little change in ecosystem respiration after 5 years. Although shrub biomass and leaf area increased in the high nutrient plots, loss of moss photosynthesis owing to nutrient toxicity, increased vascular plant shading and greater litter accumulation contributed to the lower levels of CO 2 uptake. Our study highlights the importance of long‐term experiments as we did not observe lower NEE until the fifth year of the experiment. However, this may be a transient response as the treatment plots continue to change. Higher levels of nutrients may cause changes in plant composition and productivity and decrease the ability of peatlands to sequester CO 2 from the atmosphere.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baltosser, W. H., & Zar, J. H. (1996) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2265725 · Cited by 35,166
Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research
Sokal, R. R., & Rohlf, F. J. (1969) · Cited by 20,963
Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change
Davidson, E. A., & Janssens, I. A. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04514 · Cited by 6,919
Northern Peatlands: Role in the Carbon Cycle and Probable Responses to Climatic Warming
Gorham, E. (1991) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.2307/1941811 · Cited by 3,721
Cornwell, W. K., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Amatangelo, K., Dorrepaal, E., Eviner, V. T., Godoy, O., Hobbie, S. E., Hoorens, B., Kurokawa, H., Pérez‐Harguindeguy, N., et al. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01219.x · Cited by 2,855
Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability in Invasive Nonindigenous Plants: A Hypothesis
Blossey, B., & Notzold, R. (1995) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2261425 · Cited by 1,906
Blake, S. F., & Fernald, M. L. (1951) · Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club · doi:10.2307/2482052 · Cited by 1,653
A Primer of Ecological Statistics
Ford, E. D. (2005) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1198/tas.2005.s32 · Cited by 1,544
Responses of Arctic Tundra to Experimental and Observed Changes in Climate
Chapin, F. S., Shaver, G. R., Giblin, A. E., Nadelhoffer, K. J., & Laundre, J. A. (1995) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939337 · Cited by 1,409
Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems
Schimel, D. S., House, J. I., Hibbard, K. A., Bousquet, P., Ciais, P., Peylin, P., Braswell, B. H., Apps, M. J., Baker, D., Bondeau, A., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35102500 · Cited by 1,379
Cited by
Expert assessment of future vulnerability of the global peatland carbon sink
Loisel, J., Gallego-Sala, A. V., Amesbury, M. J., Magnan, G., Anshari, G., Beilman, D. W., Benavides, J. C., Blewett, J., Camill, P., Charman, D. J., et al. (2021) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-020-00944-0 · Cited by 445
Self-citationMicrobial communities in natural and disturbed peatlands: A review
Andersen, R., Chapman, S. J., & Artz, R. R. E. (2013) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.10.003 · Cited by 401
UK land use and soil carbon sequestration
Ostle, N. J., Levy, P. E., Evans, C. D., & Smith, P. (2009) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.006 · Cited by 259
The cascade of C:N:P stoichiometry in an ombrotrophic peatland: from plants to peat
Wang, M., Moore, T. R., Talbot, J., & Richard, P. J. H. (2014) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/2/024003 · Cited by 65
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- BUBIER, J. L., MOORE, T. R., & BLEDZKI, L. A.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04-25
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1168-1186
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2000209448
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 73
- FWCI
- 13.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of nutrient addition on vegetation and carbon cycling in an ombrotrophic bog. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01346.x
- The paper
- BUBIER, J. L., MOORE, T. R., & BLEDZKI, L. A. (2007). Effects of nutrient addition on vegetation and carbon cycling in an ombrotrophic bog. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01346.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.