The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dry deposition parameterization in a chemistry general circulation model and its influence on the distribution of reactive trace gases
Open accessAbstract
A dry deposition scheme has been developed for the chemistry general circulation model to improve the description of the removal of chemically reactive trace gases at the earth's surface. The chemistry scheme simulates background CH 4‐CO‐NOx‐ HOx photochemistry and calculates concentrations of, for example, HNO 3, NOx, and O 3. A resistance analog is used to parameterize the dry deposition velocity for these gases. The aerodynamic resistance is calculated from the model boundary layer stability, wind speed, and surface roughness, and a quasi‐laminar boundary layer resistance is incorporated. The stomatal resistance is explicitly calculated and combined with representative cuticle and mesophyll resistances for each trace gas. The new scheme contributes to internal consistency in the model, in particular with respect to diurnal and seasonal cycles in both the chemistry and the planetary boundary layer processes and surface characteristics that control dry deposition. Evaluation of the model indicates satisfactory agreement between calculated and observed deposition velocities. Comparison of the results with model simulations in which the deposition velocity was kept constant indicates significant relative differences in deposition fluxes and surface layer trace gas concentrations up to about ±35%. Shortcomings are discussed, for example, violation of the constant flux approach for the surface layer, the lacking canopy description, and effects of surface water layers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A revised parameterization for gaseous dry deposition in air-quality models
Zhang, L., Brook, J. R., & Vet, R. (2003) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-3-2067-2003 · Cited by 676
Pöschl, U., & Shiraiwa, M. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500487s · Cited by 657
NITROGEN DEPOSITION ONTO THE UNITED STATES AND WESTERN EUROPE: SYNTHESIS OF OBSERVATIONS AND MODELS
Holland, E. A., Braswell, B. H., Sulzman, J., & Lamarque, J.-F. (2005) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/03-5162 · Cited by 418
Huijnen, V., Williams, J., van Weele, M., van Noije, T., Krol, M., Dentener, F., Segers, A., Houweling, S., Peters, W., de Laat, J., et al. (2010) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-3-445-2010 · Cited by 349
Zhang, K., O'Donnell, D., Kazil, J., Stier, P., Kinne, S., Lohmann, U., Ferrachat, S., Croft, B., Quaas, J., Wan, H., et al. (2012) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-12-8911-2012 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Ganzeveld, L., & Lelieveld, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1995-10-20
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- D10
- Pages
- 20999-21012
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141857539
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dry deposition parameterization in a chemistry general circulation model and its influence on the distribution of reactive trace gases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/95jd02266
- The paper
- Ganzeveld, L., & Lelieveld, J. (1995). Dry deposition parameterization in a chemistry general circulation model and its influence on the distribution of reactive trace gases. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/95jd02266
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.