Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A three‐dimensional synthesis study of δ18O in atmospheric CO2: 1. Surface fluxes

Open access
Ciais, Philippe, Denning, A. Scott, Tans, Pieter P., Berry, Joseph A., Randall, David A., Collatz, G. James, Sellers, Piers J., White, James W. C., Trolier, Michael, Meijer, Harro A. J., Francey, Roger J., Monfray, Patrick, Heimann, Martin·1997·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

The isotope 18 O in CO 2 is of particular interest in studying the global carbon cycle because it is sensitive to the processes by which the global land biosphere absorbs and respires CO 2. Carbon dioxide and water exchange isotopically both in leaves and in soils, and the 18 O character of atmospheric CO 2 is strongly influenced by the land biota, which should constrain the gross primary productivity and total respiration of land ecosystems. In this study we calculate the global surface fluxes of 18 O for vegetation and soils using the SiB2 biosphere model coupled with the Colorado State University general circulation model. This approach makes it possible to use physiological variables that are consistently weighted by the carbon assimilation rate and integrated through the vegetation canopy. We also calculate the air‐sea exchange of 18 O and the isotopic character of fossil emissions and biomass burning. Global mean values of the isotopic exchange with each reservoir are used to close the global budget of 18 O in CO 2. Our results confirm the fact that the land biota exert a dominant control on the δ 18 O of the atmospheric reservoir. At the global scale, exchange with the canopy produces an isotopic enrichment of CO 2, whereas exchange with soils has the opposite effect.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/96jd02360

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Ciais, P., Denning, A. S., Tans, P. P., Berry, J. A., Randall, D. A., Collatz, G. J., Sellers, P. J., White, J. W. C., Trolier, M., Meijer, H. A. J., Francey, R. J., Monfray, P., & Heimann, M.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1997-03
Volume
102
Issue
D5
Pages
5857-5872
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140744076
Cited by
223
References
4
FWCI
10.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A three‐dimensional synthesis study of δ18O in atmospheric CO2: 1. Surface fluxes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/96jd02360
The paper
Ciais, P., Denning, A. S., Tans, P. P., Berry, J. A., Randall, D. A., Collatz, G. J., Sellers, P. J., White, J. W. C., Trolier, M., Meijer, H. A. J., Francey, R. J., Monfray, P., & Heimann, M. (1997). A three‐dimensional synthesis study of δ18O in atmospheric CO2: 1. Surface fluxes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/96jd02360

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.