Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 540

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NOx from lightning: 1. Global distribution based on lightning physics

Open access
Price, Colin, Penner, Joyce, Prather, Michael·1997·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

This paper begins a study on the role of lightning in maintaining the global distribution of nitrogen oxides (NO x) in the troposphere. It presents the first global and seasonal distributions of lightning‐produced NO x (LNO x) based on the observed distribution of electrical storms and the physical properties of lightning strokes. We derive a global rate for cloud‐to‐ground (CG) flashes of 20–30 flashes/s with a mean energy per flash of 6.7×10 9 J. Intracloud (IC) flashes are more frequent, 50–70 flashes/s but have 10% of the energy of CG strokes and, consequently, produce significantly less NO x. It appears to us that the majority of previous studies have mistakenly assumed that all lightning flashes produce the same amount of NO x, thus overestimating the NO x production by a factor of 3. On the other hand, we feel these same studies have underestimated the energy released in CG flashes, resulting in two negating assumptions. For CG energies we adopt a production rate of 10×10 16 molecules NO/J based on the current literature. Using a method to simulate global lightning frequencies from satellite‐observed cloud data, we have calculated the LNO x on various spatial (regional, zonal, meridional, and global) and temporal scales (daily, monthly, seasonal, and interannual). Regionally, the production of LNO x is concentrated over tropical continental regions, predominantly in the summer hemisphere. The annual mean production rate is calculated to be 12.2 Tg N/yr, and we believe it extremely unlikely that this number is less than 5 or more than 20 Tg N/yr. Although most of LNO x, is produced in the lowest 5 km by CG lightning, convective mixing in the thunderstorms is likely to deposit large amounts of NO x, in the upper troposphere where it is important in ozone production. On an annual basis, 64% of the LNO x, is produced in the northern hemisphere, implying that the northern hemisphere should have natural ozone levels as much as 2 times greater than the southern hemisphere, even before anthropogenic influences. The amount of O 3 produced from this NO x is expected to exceed the stratospheric source by a factor of 1.5, and thus the hemispheric asymmetry in LNO x would lead to a significant excess of northern hemisphere O 3 even in the preindustrial troposphere. (The monthly climatologies for LNO x on a 1°×1° latitude‐longitude grid can be obtained by e‐mail to cprice@flash.tau.ac.il).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/96jd03504

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 540

Metadata

Authors
Price, C., Penner, J., & Prather, M.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1997-03
Volume
102
Issue
D5
Pages
5929-5941
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095427266
Cited by
540
References
1
FWCI
15.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.