Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 739

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterization of tropospheric aerosols over the oceans with the NOAA advanced very high resolution radiometer optical thickness operational product

Open access
Husar, Rudolf B., Prospero, Joseph M., Stowe, Larry L.·1997·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) advanced very high resolution radiometer (AVHRR) is an instrument on a polar orbiting satellite that provides information on global aerosol distributions. The remote sensing algorithm is based on measurements of backscattered solar radiation which yield a measure of the “radiatively equivalent” aerosol optical thickness τ Asat(EAOT) over the oceans. Seasonally composited EAOT data for the period July 1989 to June 1991 reveal many spatially coherent plume‐like patterns that can usually be interpreted in terms of known (or reasonably hypothesized) sources in association with climatological wind fields. The largest and most persistent areas of high EAOT values are associated with wind‐blown dust and biomass burning sources; especially prominent are sources in Africa, the middle East, and the Asian subcontinent. Prominent plumes over the midlatitude North Atlantic are attributed to pollution emissions from North America and Europe. Large plumes attributed to pollution aerosols and dust from sources in Asia are clearly visible over the western and central North Pacific. On a global scale the annually averaged northern hemisphere EAOT values are about 1.7 times greater than those in the southern hemisphere. Considering each hemisphere separately, EAOT values in summer are about twice those in winter. Within the midlatitude band 30°–60° (i.e., where anthropogenic emissions are greatest) the summer/winter ratio is about 3. The temporal variability of monthly mean EAOT in specific ocean regions often shows characteristic seasonal patterns that are usually consistent with aerosol measurements made in the marine boundary layer. Nonetheless, there are features in the EAOT distributions that can not be readily interpreted at this time. The AVHRR EAOT distributions demonstrate that satellite products can serve as a useful tool for the planning and implementation of focused aerosol research programs and that they will be especially important in studies of climate‐related processes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/96jd04009

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 739

Metadata

Authors
Husar, R. B., Prospero, J. M., & Stowe, L. L.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1997-07
Volume
102
Issue
D14
Pages
16889-16909
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153014384
Cited by
739
References
2
FWCI
46.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of tropospheric aerosols over the oceans with the NOAA advanced very high resolution radiometer optical thickness operational product. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/96jd04009
The paper
Husar, R. B., Prospero, J. M., & Stowe, L. L. (1997). Characterization of tropospheric aerosols over the oceans with the NOAA advanced very high resolution radiometer optical thickness operational product. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/96jd04009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.