The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An analysis of lidar observations of polar stratospheric clouds
Abstract
We interpret lidar observations by Browell et al. (1990) using single scattering calculations for nonspherical particles and aerosol microphysical calculations. Many of the lidar observations are consistent with particles containing 10 ppbv of condensed nitric acid vapor and an equivalent mass of water. The lidar observations of these Type 1 clouds identify two subtypes, whose properties we deduce. Type Ib particles arc spherical, or nearly spherical, and typically have radii near 0.5 (μm Type Ia particles are not spherical, and have a spherical volume equivalent radius exceeding 1.0 μm. Several factors may cause variations in the size of the particles. The UK) St significant factors are the cooling rate and the degree to which the air parcels cool below the condensation point. Specific examples in which cooling rate and cooling point nrny have led to variations in particle size are found in the Browell et al. (1990) data set. Condensation of 1 ppmm of water or less is quantitatively sufficient to account for the magnitude of the lidar backscatter observed from water ice clouds. The ice particles are not spherical in shape. The sizes of particles in water ice clouds cannot be determined because they are much larger than the wavelength of the lidar.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and history
Solomon, S. (1999) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/1999rg900008 · Cited by 2,008
Carslaw, K. S., Luo, B. P., Clegg, S. L., Peter, T., Brimblecombe, P., & Crutzen, P. J. (1994) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/94gl02799 · Cited by 374
Depolarization of light backscattered by randomly oriented nonspherical particles
Mishchenko, M. I., & Hovenier, J. W. (1995) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.20.001356 · Cited by 297
Dye, J. E., Baumgardner, D., Gandrud, B. W., Kawa, S. R., Kelly, K. K., Loewenstein, M., Ferry, G. V., Chan, K. R., & Gary, B. L. (1992) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/91jd02740 · Cited by 259
Airborne lidar observations in the wintertime Arctic stratosphere: Polar stratospheric clouds
Browell, E. V., Butler, C. F., Ismail, S., Robinette, P. A., Carter, A. F., Higdon, N. S., Toon, O. B., Schoeberl, M. R., & Tuck, A. F. (1990) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/gl017i004p00385 · Cited by 259
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Toon, O. B., Browell, E. V., Kinne, S., & Jordan, J.
- Venue
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 393-396
- ISSN
- 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8007
- OpenAlex
- W2026673973
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An analysis of lidar observations of polar stratospheric clouds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/gl017i004p00393
- The paper
- Toon, O. B., Browell, E. V., Kinne, S., & Jordan, J. (1990). An analysis of lidar observations of polar stratospheric clouds. Geophysical Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1029/gl017i004p00393
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.