The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experimental hypervelocity impact into quartz sand: Distribution and shock metamorphism of ejecta
Abstract
We report results of vertical impacts of 0.3-g cylindrical Lexan projectiles into noncohesive quartz sand in which vertical and horizontal reference strata were employed by using layers of colored sand. The impacts were performed at velocities of 5.9–6.9 km/s with the NASA Ames vertical gun ballistic range. The craters, 30–33 cm in diameter, reveal a radial decay of the ejecta mass per unit area with a power of –2.8–−3.5. Material displaced from the upper 15% of the crater depth d is represented within the whole ejecta blanket, material from deeper than 28% of d is deposited inside 2 crater radii, and no material from deeper than 33% of d was ejected beyond the crater rim. Shock-metamorphosed particles (glassy agglutinates, cataclastic breccias, and comminuted quartz) amount to some 4% of the total displaced mass and indicate progressive zones of decay of shock intensity from a peak pressure of 300 kbar. The mass distribution of these particles is distinctly different from that for the total displaced mass; 85% of the shock-metamorphosed mass was concentrated within the crater itself. The shock-metamorphosed particles and the shock-induced change in the grain size distribution of ejected samples have close analogies to the basic characteristics of the lunar regolith. Possible applications to regolith formation and to ejecta formations of large-scale impact craters are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Planetesimals to planets: Numerical simulation of collisional evolution
Greenberg, R., Wacker, J. F., Hartmann, W. K., & Chapman, C. R. (1978) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/0019-1035(78)90057-x · Cited by 476
The role of volatiles and lithology in the impact cratering process
Kieffer, S. W., & Simonds, C. H. (1980) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/rg018i001p00143 · Cited by 396
Osinski, G. R., & Spray, J. G. (2005) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2005.tb00148.x · Cited by 71
Observations at terrestrial impact structures: Their utility in constraining crater formation
Grieve, R. A. F., & Therriault, A. M. (2004) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00336.x · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Stöffler, D., Gault, D. E., Wedekind, J., & Polkowski, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1975-10-10
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 4062-4077
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987789528
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental hypervelocity impact into quartz sand: Distribution and shock metamorphism of ejecta. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb080i029p04062
- The paper
- Stöffler, D., Gault, D. E., Wedekind, J., & Polkowski, G. (1975). Experimental hypervelocity impact into quartz sand: Distribution and shock metamorphism of ejecta. Journal of Geophysical Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb080i029p04062
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.