The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of volatiles and lithology in the impact cratering process
Abstract
A survey of published descriptions of 32 of the largest, least eroded terrestrial impact structures reveals that the amount of melt at craters in crystalline rocks is approximately 2 orders of magnitude greater than at craters in sedimentary rocks. In this paper we present a model for the impact process and examine whether this difference in melt abundance is due to differences in the amount of melt generated in various target materials or due to differences in the fate of the melt during late stages of the impact. The model consists of a theoretical part for the early stages of impact, based on a Birch‐Murnaghan equation of state, a penetration scheme after Shoemaker (1963), and an attenuation model modified from Gault and Heitowit (1963), and a descriptive part for the later stages of impact, based on field observations at the large terrestrial craters. The impacts of iron, stone, permafrost, and ice meteorites 1 km in diameter into crystalline, carbonate, dry sandstone, ice‐saturated sand, and ice targets are modeled for velocities of 6.25, 17, and 24.6 km/s. Tables of calculated crater volume, depth of penetration of the meteorite, equivalent scaled depth of burst, radii to various peak pressure isobars, volume of silicate melt, and volume of water vapor (or, in the case of carbonate, carbon dioxide vapor) are presented. Simple algebraic expressions for pressure attenuation are derived: for the near field, dX/dR = 3 Xn/R(1 ‐ n), where X is the pressure normalized to an averaged bulk modulus for the target rocks, R is the radius normalized to the radius of the cavity in which energy is initially deposited, and n is the pressure derivative of the bulk modulus. For the far field the pressure attenuation is given by dX/dR ∼−3 X/R. For most materials considered, n = 4–6, and therefore the near‐field attenuation is proportional to R−3.65 ‐ R−4 and the far‐field attenuation is proportional to R−3. The calculations show that the volume of material shocked to pressures sufficient for melting should not be significantly different in sedimentary and crystalline rocks. Hence we conclude that shock melt is formed in the early stages of the cratering process by impacts into rocks rich in volatiles but is destroyed by the cratering process. We propose that the melt is finely dispersed by the great expansion of shocked volatiles upon release from high pressure and that suevite units are the product of this process. The fragmented silicates produced by this process may react penecontemporaneously with the hot volatiles to produce hydrated minerals such as clays. This process may produce hydrothermally altered minerals in planetary regoliths, such as the Martian regolith. The dispersion of shock melt by volatile expansion may also account for the apparent lack of lunarlike melt sheets on the surface of Mars. Because large amounts of volatiles vaporize during impact and are transferred from depth either into space, into the atmosphere, or onto near‐surface ejecta by condensation, repeated impact degasses a planet, depleting some layers in volatiles and, unless the volatiles escape the planet, enriching others.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Terzaghi, K. (1943) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470172766 · Cited by 8,652
Impact and Explosion Cratering
Runcorn, S. K. (1984) · Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors · doi:10.1016/0031-9201(84)90073-6 · Cited by 1,314
The search for organic substances and inorganic volatile compounds in the surface of Mars
Biemann, K., Oro, J., Toulmin, P., Orgel, L. E., Nier, A. O., Anderson, D. M., Simmonds, P. G., Flory, D., Diaz, A. V., Rushneck, D. R., et al. (1977) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/js082i028p04641 · Cited by 607
Shock metamorphism of natural materials
Dickey, J. S. (1969) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(69)90051-9 · Cited by 527
Hugoniot equation of state of twelve rocks
McQueen, R. G., Marsh, S. P., & Fritz, J. N. (1967) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/jz072i020p04999 · Cited by 448
Lunar Sample Preliminary Examination Team (1969) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.165.3899.1211 · Cited by 402
Geochemical and mineralogical interpretation of the Viking inorganic chemical results
Toulmin, P., Baird, A. K., Clark, B. C., Keil, K., Rose, H. J., Christian, R. P., Evans, P. H., & Kelliher, W. C. (1977) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/js082i028p04625 · Cited by 375
Equation of State of Water to 250 Kilobars
Rice, M. H., & Walsh, J. M. (1957) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1743415 · Cited by 337
Experimental hypervelocity impact into quartz sand: Distribution and shock metamorphism of ejecta
Stöffler, D., Gault, D. E., Wedekind, J., & Polkowski, G. (1975) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/jb080i029p04062 · Cited by 322
Martian impact craters and emplacement of ejecta by surface flow
Carr, M. H., Crumpler, L. S., Cutts, J. A., Greeley, R., Guest, J. E., & Masursky, H. (1977) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/js082i028p04055 · Cited by 317
Cited by
The case for rainfall on a warm, wet early Mars
Craddock, R. A., & Howard, A. D. (2002) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/2001je001505 · Cited by 601
A Reevaluation of Impact Melt Production
Pierazzo, E., Vickery, A. M., & Melosh, H. J. (1997) · Icarus · doi:10.1006/icar.1997.5713 · Cited by 522
The Sudbury structure: Controversial or misunderstood?
Grieve, R. A. F., Stöffler, D., & Deutsch, A. (1991) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/91je02513 · Cited by 236
Grieve, R. A. F., & Cintala, M. J. (1992) · Meteoritics · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.1992.tb01074.x · Cited by 204
Energy, volatile production, and climatic effects of the Chicxulub Cretaceous/Tertiary impact
Pope, K. O., Baines, K. H., Ocampo, A. C., & Ivanov, B. A. (1997) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/97je01743 · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Authors
- Kieffer, S. W., & Simonds, C. H.
- Venue
- Reviews of Geophysics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1980-02
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 143-181
- ISSN
- 0096-1043 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-1209
- 1944-9208
- OpenAlex
- W2107582290
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 17.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of volatiles and lithology in the impact cratering process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/rg018i001p00143
- The paper
- Kieffer, S. W., & Simonds, C. H. (1980). The role of volatiles and lithology in the impact cratering process. Reviews of Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1029/rg018i001p00143
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.