Cited by 60

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Observations at terrestrial impact structures: Their utility in constraining crater formation

Grieve, Richard A. F., Therriault, Ann M.·2004·Meteoritics & Planetary Science

Abstract

Abstract— Hypervelocity impact involves the near instantaneous transfer of considerable energy from the impactor to a spatially limited near‐surface volume of the target body. Local geology of the target area tends to be of secondary importance, and the net result is that impacts of similar size on a given planetary body produce similar results. This is the essence of the utility of observations at impact craters, particularly terrestrial craters, in constraining impact processes. Unfortunately, there are few well‐documented results from systematic contemporaneous campaigns to characterize specific terrestrial impact structures with the full spectrum of geoscientific tools available at the time. Nevertheless, observations of the terrestrial impact record have contributed substantially to fundamental properties of impact. There is a beginning of convergence and mutual testing of observations at terrestrial impact structures and the results of modeling, in particular from recent hydrocode models. The terrestrial impact record provides few constraints on models of ejecta processes beyond a confirmation of the involvement of the local substrate in ejecta lithologies and shows that Z‐models are, at best, first order approximations. Observational evidence to date suggests that the formation of interior rings is an extension of the structural uplift process that occurs at smaller complex impact structures. There are, however, major observational gaps and cases, e.g., Vredefort, where current observations and hydrocode models are apparently inconsistent. It is, perhaps, time that the impact community as a whole considers documenting the existing observational and modeling knowledge gaps that are required to be filled to make the intellectual breakthroughs equivalent to those of the 1970s and 1980s, which were fueled by observations at terrestrial impact structures. Filling these knowledge gaps would likely be centered on the later stages of formation of complex and ring structures and on ejecta.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00336.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 130

  1. Ahrens T. J., 1977, Impact and explosion cratering, 639
  2. 10.1126/science.208.4448.1095 · DOI
  3. Andreoli M. A. G., 1999, Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution; II, 91
  4. BarlowN. G.2000.Updates to the “Catalog of large martian impact craters”(abstract #1475). 31st Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. CD‐ROM.
  5. Barringer D. M., 1906, Coon Mountain and its crater (Arizona), Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 57, 861
  6. Basilevsky A. T., 1983, Impact craters on the Moon and planets
  7. Beals C. S., 1960, A probable meteorite crater of Precambrian age at Holleford, Ontario, Publication of the Dominion Observatory, Ottawa, 24, 117
  8. Bell C., Stratigraphic and sedimentological observations from seismic data across the Chicxulub impact basin, Meteoritics & Planetary Science
  9. Boerner D. E., 1999, Geoscience impact: A synthesis of studies of the Sudbury structure, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 37, 477, 10.1139/e99-062 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1126/science.224.4651.867 · DOI
  11. Boon J. D., 1937, Meteorite scars in ancient rocks, Field and Laboratory, 5, 53
  12. Brenan R. L., 1975, The origin of Red Wing Creek structure: McKenzie County, North Dakota, Wyoming Geological Association of Earth Sciences Bulletin, 8, 1
  13. Bridges L. W. D., 1997, Ames depression, Oklahoma: Domal collapse and later subsurface solution, Oklahoma Geological Survey Circular, 100, 153
  14. 10.1038/1971241a0 · DOI
  15. Christensen L., 1973, Sedimentology and depositional environment of the Lower Danian fish clay from Stevns Klint, Denmark, Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, 22, 193
  16. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1998.tb01695.x · DOI
  17. 10.1006/icar.2002.6822 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Dence M. R., 1968, Shock metamorphism of natural materials, 169
  19. DenceM. R.1972.The nature and significance of terrestrial impact structures. Proceedings 24th International Geological Congress Section 15. pp.77–89.
  20. 10.1007/978-3-662-05010-1_2 · DOI
  21. Dence M. R., 1977, Impact and explosion cratering, 247
  22. DienoA. L.andBeckerT. A.1990.Laser‐fusion40Ar/39Ar ages of acid zhamanshinite (abstract). 21st Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. pp.271–272.
  23. Dietz R. S., 1962, Sudbury structure as an astrobleme (abstract), American Geophysical Union Transactions, 43, 445
  24. 10.1086/626999 · DOI
  25. Dressler B. O., 1984, The geology and ore deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 97
  26. 10.1007/s004100050365 · DOI
  27. 10.1029/2000GL011989 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/BF00444336 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90104-G · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1995.tb01126.x · DOI
  31. 10.1126/science.180.4088.862 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1998.tb01628.x · DOI
  33. 10.1016/0012-821X(91)90066-Q · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1999.tb01351.x · DOI
  35. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1988.tb01288.x · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1992.tb01074.x · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1029/JB089iB13p11561 · DOI
  38. 10.1029/JB088iS02p0A807 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/0040-1951(92)90152-V · DOI
  40. Grieve R. A. F., 1996, The signature of terrestrial impacts, AGSO Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics, 16, 399
  41. 10.1007/BF00384743 · DOI
  42. 10.1146/annurev.earth.28.1.305 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Grieve R. A. F., 1977, Impact and explosion cratering, 794
  44. Grieve R. A. F., 1981, Multi‐ring basins, 37
  45. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1989.tb00948.x · DOI
  46. 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90098-S · DOI
  47. 10.1029/JB087iS01p00A65 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Halliday I., 1967, Summary of drilling at the West Hawk Lake crater, Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada, 61, 108
  49. 10.1016/0009-2541(90)90072-F · DOI
  50. Hawke B. R., 1977, Impact and explosion cratering, 815
  51. HeadJ. W. SettleM. andSteinR. S.1975.Volume of material ejected from major lunar basins and implications for the depth of excavation of lunar samples. Proceedings 6th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. pp.2805–2829.
  52. Heiken G. H., 1991, Lunar sourcebook: A user's guide to the Moon, 738
  53. 10.1016/S0040-1951(98)80058-9 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1029/RG021i008p01667 · DOI
  55. Howard K. A., 1975, Flows of impact melt in lunar craters, Journal of Research of the U.S. Geological Survey, 3, 237
  56. Ivanov B. A., 1994, Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution, 81
  57. 10.1130/0-8137-2356-6.619 · DOI
  58. Ivanov B. A., 1982, Formation of the central uplift in meteoritic craters, Meteoritika, 40, 67
  59. IvanovB. A. KocharyanG. G. KostuchenkoV. N. KirjakovA. F. andPevznerL. A.1996.Puchezh‐Katunki impact crater; Preliminary data on recovered core block structure (abstract). 27th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. pp.589–590.
  60. 10.1130/G19669.1 · DOI
  61. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1988.tb01285.x · DOI
  62. 10.1016/0012-821X(95)00236-6 · DOI
  63. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2000.tb01508.x · DOI
  64. 10.1029/RG018i001p00143 · DOI
  65. LakomyR.1990.Distribution of impact‐induced phenomena in complex terrestrial impact structures: Implications for transient cavity dimensions (abstract). 11th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. pp.676–677.
  66. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2003.tb00300.x · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1999.tb01381.x · DOI
  68. Masaitis V. L., 1975, The Popigai meteorite crater., 124
  69. Masaitis V. L., 1980, The geology of astroblemes., 231
  70. Maxwell D. E., 1977, Impact and explosion cratering, 1003
  71. McKinnon W. B., 1997, Venus II, 969
  72. 10.1029/JB084iB13p07513 · DOI
  73. Melosh H. J., 1989, Impact cratering. A geologic process, 245
  74. 10.1146/annurev.earth.27.1.385 · DOI
  75. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1988.tb01282.x · DOI
  76. 10.1126/science.175.4027.1199 · DOI
  77. Milton D. J., 1996, Gosses Bluff: A latest Jurassic impact structure central Australia. Part 1: Geological structure, stratigraphy, and origin, AGSO Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics, 16, 453
  78. 10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<0407:CTTDOA>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00031-5 · DOI
  80. 10.1130/SPE247-p195 · DOI
  81. 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90107-J · DOI
  82. 10.1029/JZ066i010p03439 · DOI
  83. 10.1029/RG013i002p00337 · DOI
  84. Offield T. W., 1977, Impact and explosion cratering, 321
  85. O'KeefeJ. D.andAhrensT. J.1980.Cometary impact calculations: Flat floors multirings and central peaks (abstract). 11th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. pp.830–832.
  86. 10.1029/93JE01330 · DOI
  87. 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00558-1 · DOI
  88. Osinski G. R., The nature of the groundmass of surficial suevite from the Ries impact structure, Germany and constraints on its origin, Meteoritics & Planetary Science
  89. 10.1006/icar.1997.5713 · DOI
  90. 10.1029/98JE02496 · DOI
  91. Pike R. J., 1977, Impact and explosion cratering, 489
  92. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1985.tb00846.x · DOI
  93. 10.1029/91JE01114 · DOI
  94. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1996.tb02015.x · DOI
  95. Pohl J., 1977, Impact and explosion cratering, 343
  96. 10.1029/97JE01743 · DOI
  97. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1988.tb01281.x · DOI
  98. Reimold W. U., 1990, The controversial microdeformations in quartz from the Vredefort structure, South Africa, South Africa Journal of Geology, 93, 645
  99. Reimold W. U., 1994, Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution, 177
  100. 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00658-1 · DOI
  101. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2003.tb00301.x · DOI
  102. 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00690-8 · DOI
  103. 10.1016/S0040-1951(98)80061-9 · DOI · Paper page
  104. 10.1130/0016-7606(1975)86<1630:ZOSMAT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  105. Robertson P. B., 1977, Impact and explosion cratering, 687
  106. 10.1139/e83-101 · DOI
  107. Roddy D. J., 1977, Impact and explosion cratering, 125
  108. RoddyD. J. BoyceJ. M. ColtonG. W. andDialA. L. Jr..1975.Meteor Crater Arizona: Rim drilling with thickness structural uplift diameter depth volume and mass‐balance calculations. Proceedings 6th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. pp.2621–2644.
  109. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2002.tb01161.x · DOI
  110. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1988.tb01287.x · DOI · Paper page
  111. 10.1029/92JE01508 · DOI
  112. 10.1144/GSL.JGS.1916.072.01-04.12 · DOI
  113. Shoemaker E. M., 1963, The Moon, meteorites, and comets, 301
  114. Shoemaker E. M., 1974, Guidebook to the geology of Meteor Crater, Arizona., 1
  115. 10.1146/annurev.earth.27.1.75 · DOI
  116. 10.1038/373130a0 · DOI · Paper page
  117. 10.1017/CBO9780511564581 · DOI
  118. Stearns R. G., 1968, Shock metamorphism of natural materials, 323
  119. Stöffler D., 1994, Classification and nomenclature of impact metamorphic rocks: A proposal to the IUGS subcommission on the systematics of metamorphic rocks, European Science Foundation Network on Impact Cratering Newsletter, 2, 8
  120. 10.1029/JB080i029p04062 · DOI
  121. Stöffler D., 1988, Deep‐drilling in crystalline bedrock, 277, 10.1007/978-3-642-73452-6_25 · DOI
  122. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2003.tb00279.x · DOI
  123. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1997.tb01242.x · DOI · Paper page
  124. Therriault A. M., 2002, The Sudbury igneous complex: A differentiated impact melt, Economic Geology, 97, 1521, 10.2113/gsecongeo.97.7.1521 · DOI · Paper page
  125. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1998.tb01652.x · DOI · Paper page
  126. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2003.tb00265.x · DOI
  127. 10.1029/96GL01566 · DOI
  128. 10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00225-9 · DOI
  129. Whitehead J., 2002, An evaluation of the scatter in MOLA depth versus diameter data for martian complex craters using Viking and MOC images (abstract), Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 37, A150
  130. 10.1126/science.162.3850.258 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Grieve, R. A. F., & Therriault, A. M.
Venue
Meteoritics & Planetary Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-02
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
199-216
ISSN
  • 1086-9379
  • 1945-5100
Cited by
60
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review