The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Observations at terrestrial impact structures: Their utility in constraining crater formation
Abstract
Abstract— Hypervelocity impact involves the near instantaneous transfer of considerable energy from the impactor to a spatially limited near‐surface volume of the target body. Local geology of the target area tends to be of secondary importance, and the net result is that impacts of similar size on a given planetary body produce similar results. This is the essence of the utility of observations at impact craters, particularly terrestrial craters, in constraining impact processes. Unfortunately, there are few well‐documented results from systematic contemporaneous campaigns to characterize specific terrestrial impact structures with the full spectrum of geoscientific tools available at the time. Nevertheless, observations of the terrestrial impact record have contributed substantially to fundamental properties of impact. There is a beginning of convergence and mutual testing of observations at terrestrial impact structures and the results of modeling, in particular from recent hydrocode models. The terrestrial impact record provides few constraints on models of ejecta processes beyond a confirmation of the involvement of the local substrate in ejecta lithologies and shows that Z‐models are, at best, first order approximations. Observational evidence to date suggests that the formation of interior rings is an extension of the structural uplift process that occurs at smaller complex impact structures. There are, however, major observational gaps and cases, e.g., Vredefort, where current observations and hydrocode models are apparently inconsistent. It is, perhaps, time that the impact community as a whole considers documenting the existing observational and modeling knowledge gaps that are required to be filled to make the intellectual breakthroughs equivalent to those of the 1970s and 1980s, which were fueled by observations at terrestrial impact structures. Filling these knowledge gaps would likely be centered on the later stages of formation of complex and ring structures and on ejecta.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The former is indicative of well-known inward and upward kinematics in parautochthonous crater-floor rocks observed in structural uplifts at centers of smaller terrestrial impact structures.
“The former is indicative of the well-known inward and upward kinematics in the parautochthonous rocks of the crater floor observed in structural uplifts at the centers of smaller terrestrial impact structures (Grieve and Therriault 2004).”
From Observations and interpretations at Vredefort, Sudbury, and Chicxulub: Towards an empirical model of terrestrial impact basin formation (2008) · cites this paper as Grieve and Therriault 2004
This pattern is characteristic of structural uplift in transient cavity modification at complex impact structures.
“This is characteristic of the process of structural uplift in transient cavity modification at complex impact structures (Grieve and Therriault 2004).”
From Observations and interpretations at Vredefort, Sudbury, and Chicxulub: Towards an empirical model of terrestrial impact basin formation (2008) · cites this paper as Grieve and Therriault 2004
Citations
Cites
Spray, J. G., Butler, H. R., & Thompson, L. M. (2004) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00341.x · Cited by 75
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 130
- Ahrens T. J., 1977, Impact and explosion cratering, 639
- 10.1126/science.208.4448.1095 · DOI
- Andreoli M. A. G., 1999, Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution; II, 91
- BarlowN. G.2000.Updates to the “Catalog of large martian impact craters”(abstract #1475). 31st Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. CD‐ROM.
- Barringer D. M., 1906, Coon Mountain and its crater (Arizona), Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 57, 861
- Basilevsky A. T., 1983, Impact craters on the Moon and planets
- Beals C. S., 1960, A probable meteorite crater of Precambrian age at Holleford, Ontario, Publication of the Dominion Observatory, Ottawa, 24, 117
- Bell C., Stratigraphic and sedimentological observations from seismic data across the Chicxulub impact basin, Meteoritics & Planetary Science
- Boerner D. E., 1999, Geoscience impact: A synthesis of studies of the Sudbury structure, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 37, 477, 10.1139/e99-062 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.224.4651.867 · DOI
- Boon J. D., 1937, Meteorite scars in ancient rocks, Field and Laboratory, 5, 53
- Brenan R. L., 1975, The origin of Red Wing Creek structure: McKenzie County, North Dakota, Wyoming Geological Association of Earth Sciences Bulletin, 8, 1
- Bridges L. W. D., 1997, Ames depression, Oklahoma: Domal collapse and later subsurface solution, Oklahoma Geological Survey Circular, 100, 153
- 10.1038/1971241a0 · DOI
- Christensen L., 1973, Sedimentology and depositional environment of the Lower Danian fish clay from Stevns Klint, Denmark, Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, 22, 193
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1998.tb01695.x · DOI
- 10.1006/icar.2002.6822 · DOI · Paper page
- Dence M. R., 1968, Shock metamorphism of natural materials, 169
- DenceM. R.1972.The nature and significance of terrestrial impact structures. Proceedings 24th International Geological Congress Section 15. pp.77–89.
- 10.1007/978-3-662-05010-1_2 · DOI
- Dence M. R., 1977, Impact and explosion cratering, 247
- DienoA. L.andBeckerT. A.1990.Laser‐fusion40Ar/39Ar ages of acid zhamanshinite (abstract). 21st Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. pp.271–272.
- Dietz R. S., 1962, Sudbury structure as an astrobleme (abstract), American Geophysical Union Transactions, 43, 445
- 10.1086/626999 · DOI
- Dressler B. O., 1984, The geology and ore deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 97
- 10.1007/s004100050365 · DOI
- 10.1029/2000GL011989 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00444336 · DOI
- 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90104-G · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1995.tb01126.x · DOI
- 10.1126/science.180.4088.862 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1998.tb01628.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0012-821X(91)90066-Q · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1999.tb01351.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1988.tb01288.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1992.tb01074.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1029/JB089iB13p11561 · DOI
- 10.1029/JB088iS02p0A807 · DOI
- 10.1016/0040-1951(92)90152-V · DOI
- Grieve R. A. F., 1996, The signature of terrestrial impacts, AGSO Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics, 16, 399
- 10.1007/BF00384743 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.earth.28.1.305 · DOI · Paper page
- Grieve R. A. F., 1977, Impact and explosion cratering, 794
- Grieve R. A. F., 1981, Multi‐ring basins, 37
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1989.tb00948.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90098-S · DOI
- 10.1029/JB087iS01p00A65 · DOI · Paper page
- Halliday I., 1967, Summary of drilling at the West Hawk Lake crater, Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada, 61, 108
- 10.1016/0009-2541(90)90072-F · DOI
- Hawke B. R., 1977, Impact and explosion cratering, 815
- HeadJ. W. SettleM. andSteinR. S.1975.Volume of material ejected from major lunar basins and implications for the depth of excavation of lunar samples. Proceedings 6th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. pp.2805–2829.
- Heiken G. H., 1991, Lunar sourcebook: A user's guide to the Moon, 738
- 10.1016/S0040-1951(98)80058-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1029/RG021i008p01667 · DOI
- Howard K. A., 1975, Flows of impact melt in lunar craters, Journal of Research of the U.S. Geological Survey, 3, 237
- Ivanov B. A., 1994, Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution, 81
- 10.1130/0-8137-2356-6.619 · DOI
- Ivanov B. A., 1982, Formation of the central uplift in meteoritic craters, Meteoritika, 40, 67
- IvanovB. A. KocharyanG. G. KostuchenkoV. N. KirjakovA. F. andPevznerL. A.1996.Puchezh‐Katunki impact crater; Preliminary data on recovered core block structure (abstract). 27th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. pp.589–590.
- 10.1130/G19669.1 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1988.tb01285.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0012-821X(95)00236-6 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2000.tb01508.x · DOI
- 10.1029/RG018i001p00143 · DOI
- LakomyR.1990.Distribution of impact‐induced phenomena in complex terrestrial impact structures: Implications for transient cavity dimensions (abstract). 11th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. pp.676–677.
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2003.tb00300.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1999.tb01381.x · DOI
- Masaitis V. L., 1975, The Popigai meteorite crater., 124
- Masaitis V. L., 1980, The geology of astroblemes., 231
- Maxwell D. E., 1977, Impact and explosion cratering, 1003
- McKinnon W. B., 1997, Venus II, 969
- 10.1029/JB084iB13p07513 · DOI
- Melosh H. J., 1989, Impact cratering. A geologic process, 245
- 10.1146/annurev.earth.27.1.385 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1988.tb01282.x · DOI
- 10.1126/science.175.4027.1199 · DOI
- Milton D. J., 1996, Gosses Bluff: A latest Jurassic impact structure central Australia. Part 1: Geological structure, stratigraphy, and origin, AGSO Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics, 16, 453
- 10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<0407:CTTDOA>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00031-5 · DOI
- 10.1130/SPE247-p195 · DOI
- 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90107-J · DOI
- 10.1029/JZ066i010p03439 · DOI
- 10.1029/RG013i002p00337 · DOI
- Offield T. W., 1977, Impact and explosion cratering, 321
- O'KeefeJ. D.andAhrensT. J.1980.Cometary impact calculations: Flat floors multirings and central peaks (abstract). 11th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. pp.830–832.
- 10.1029/93JE01330 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00558-1 · DOI
- Osinski G. R., The nature of the groundmass of surficial suevite from the Ries impact structure, Germany and constraints on its origin, Meteoritics & Planetary Science
- 10.1006/icar.1997.5713 · DOI
- 10.1029/98JE02496 · DOI
- Pike R. J., 1977, Impact and explosion cratering, 489
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1985.tb00846.x · DOI
- 10.1029/91JE01114 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1996.tb02015.x · DOI
- Pohl J., 1977, Impact and explosion cratering, 343
- 10.1029/97JE01743 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1988.tb01281.x · DOI
- Reimold W. U., 1990, The controversial microdeformations in quartz from the Vredefort structure, South Africa, South Africa Journal of Geology, 93, 645
- Reimold W. U., 1994, Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution, 177
- 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00658-1 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2003.tb00301.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00690-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0040-1951(98)80061-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1130/0016-7606(1975)86<1630:ZOSMAT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Robertson P. B., 1977, Impact and explosion cratering, 687
- 10.1139/e83-101 · DOI
- Roddy D. J., 1977, Impact and explosion cratering, 125
- RoddyD. J. BoyceJ. M. ColtonG. W. andDialA. L. Jr..1975.Meteor Crater Arizona: Rim drilling with thickness structural uplift diameter depth volume and mass‐balance calculations. Proceedings 6th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. pp.2621–2644.
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2002.tb01161.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1988.tb01287.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1029/92JE01508 · DOI
- 10.1144/GSL.JGS.1916.072.01-04.12 · DOI
- Shoemaker E. M., 1963, The Moon, meteorites, and comets, 301
- Shoemaker E. M., 1974, Guidebook to the geology of Meteor Crater, Arizona., 1
- 10.1146/annurev.earth.27.1.75 · DOI
- 10.1038/373130a0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511564581 · DOI
- Stearns R. G., 1968, Shock metamorphism of natural materials, 323
- Stöffler D., 1994, Classification and nomenclature of impact metamorphic rocks: A proposal to the IUGS subcommission on the systematics of metamorphic rocks, European Science Foundation Network on Impact Cratering Newsletter, 2, 8
- 10.1029/JB080i029p04062 · DOI
- Stöffler D., 1988, Deep‐drilling in crystalline bedrock, 277, 10.1007/978-3-642-73452-6_25 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2003.tb00279.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1997.tb01242.x · DOI · Paper page
- Therriault A. M., 2002, The Sudbury igneous complex: A differentiated impact melt, Economic Geology, 97, 1521, 10.2113/gsecongeo.97.7.1521 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1998.tb01652.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2003.tb00265.x · DOI
- 10.1029/96GL01566 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00225-9 · DOI
- Whitehead J., 2002, An evaluation of the scatter in MOLA depth versus diameter data for martian complex craters using Viking and MOC images (abstract), Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 37, A150
- 10.1126/science.162.3850.258 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
GRIEVE, R. A. F., REIMOLD, W. U., MORGAN, J., RILLER, U., & PILKINGTON, M. (2008) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb01086.x · Cited by 90
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Grieve, R. A. F., & Therriault, A. M.
- Venue
- Meteoritics & Planetary Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-216
- ISSN
- 1086-9379
- 1945-5100
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review