Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effects of subsurface boiling and dilution on the isotopic compositions of Yellowstone thermal waters

Truesdell, Alfred H., Nathenson, Manuel, Rye, Robert O.·1977·Journal of Geophysical Research

Abstract

Studies of isotope hydrology of geothermal systems have generally emphasized deep circulation of meteoric water, demonstrated by constancy of deuterium contents, and an ‘oxygen isotope shift’ to higher oxygen 18 contents produced by water-rock reactions. However, subsurface boiling (in high-temperature systems) and dilution may cause deuterium (and oxygen 18) contents of hot spring and recharge waters to difference significantly. By using thermodynamic and isotopic fractionation data for water and steam the differences in chloride, oxygen 18, and deuterium between surface and deep thermal waters have been calculated for ‘single-stage’ (in which steam remains mixed with water and separates near a single temperature) and ‘continuous’ (in which steam is separated as it is formed) steam separation. Although changes in chloride concentration resulting from these processes are nearly identical, isotopic changes differ greatly. Single-stage steam separation from 250° to 95°C results in increases in Cl, 103 ln Δ18O, and 103 ln ΔD(Δ = [(103 + δsurf)/(103 + δdeep)]) of 1.44 times, 1.75‰, and 9.1‰, respectively, whereas continuous steam separation results in increases of 1.41 times, 1.05‰, and 3.1‰. Because of these effects, deuterium contents of hot springs may be substantially higher than those of recharging waters, and part of the observed oxygen isotope shift may be due to boiling. These calculations have been applied to the deuterium and chloride compositions of hot spring and shallow drill hole waters of Norris, Lower, and Shoshone Geyser basins in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. The diverse compositions observed could result from boiling with ‘multiple-stage’ (intermediate between single-stage and continuous) steam separation of mixtures of a single deep thermal water (360°C, 310 ppm Cl, and −149‰ δD) with cold dilute (5°C, 2 ppm Cl) meteoric waters differing in deuterium according to locality (Norris, −142‰; Lower, −144‰; and Shoshone, −133‰). The recharge to the deep thermal water must be precipitation remote from the geyser basins or ancient precipitation from a colder period.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/jb082i026p03694

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Truesdell, A. H., Nathenson, M., & Rye, R. O.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research
Published
1977-09-10
Volume
82
Issue
26
Pages
3694-3704
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043787408
Cited by
258
References
4
FWCI
7.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of subsurface boiling and dilution on the isotopic compositions of Yellowstone thermal waters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb082i026p03694
The paper
Truesdell, A. H., Nathenson, M., & Rye, R. O. (1977). The effects of subsurface boiling and dilution on the isotopic compositions of Yellowstone thermal waters. Journal of Geophysical Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb082i026p03694

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.