Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 315

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Uranium‐lead isotopic ages of the Samail Ophiolite, Oman, with applications to Tethyan ocean ridge tectonics

Tilton, G. R., Hopson, C. A., Wright, J. E.·1981·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

Plagiogranites are a minor but widespread component of the Samail ophiolite plutonic member. They crystallized from the most fractionated melts generated by magmatic crystallization and differentiation of a steady state magma chamber beneath the Tethyan spreading ocean ridge, and their ages are thought to mark the time of ocean crust formation. Isotopic U‐Pb ages of zircons from 13 plagiogranites collected along a 270‐km segment of the Samail ophiolite subparallel to the regional trend of the sheeted dike complex (the former spreading ridge axis direction) define a narrow time interval of 93.5–97.9 m.y., with a pronounced clustering about 95 m.y. The zircon ages of the plagiogranites agree remarkably well with the early Cenomanian to early Turonian biostratigraphic ages of sediments that are intercalated within the ophiolite pillow lavas and that lie just above them (Tippit et al., 1981). The agreement of radiometric and biostratigraphic ages provides strong support for the conclusion that the plagiogranite U‐Pb ages closely date the time span of ocean crust formation. No step changes in age patterns are observed along the ridge axis (sheeted dike) direction, suggesting that there are no major internal offsets of the ophiolite by transform or other faults along most of the traverse. One possible exception occurs at the southeastern end of the sampled interval (Ibra area), where a 3 m.y. discontinuity might be caused by an unmapped fault. Assuming that the regional trend of the sheeted dikes (N10°–25°W) marks the direction of the former spreading ridge axis, the present array of sample localities spans a distance of 130 to 195 km normal to that axis (i.e., in the spreading direction). The data as a whole do not define a clear‐cut age trend normal to the spreading axis, but by eliminating samples that may be aberrant due to faulting, the data array suggests a pattern of increasing ages from east to west. This would indicate that the Samail ophiolite is derived from the western (southwestern) side of the Tethyan spreading system—a conclusion reached independently from geological evidence. Also, the gentle age gradient in the spreading direction (i.e., between 130 and 195 km of ocean crust were formed within an age span of no more than 2 m.y.) suggests a very fast spreading rate. This conclusion also is supported by independent geologic evidence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/jb086ib04p02763

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 315

Metadata

Authors
Tilton, G. R., Hopson, C. A., & Wright, J. E.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
1981-04-10
Volume
86
Issue
B4
Pages
2763-2775
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981145264
Cited by
315
References
1
FWCI
8.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uranium‐lead isotopic ages of the Samail Ophiolite, Oman, with applications to Tethyan ocean ridge tectonics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb086ib04p02763
The paper
Tilton, G. R., Hopson, C. A., & Wright, J. E. (1981). Uranium‐lead isotopic ages of the Samail Ophiolite, Oman, with applications to Tethyan ocean ridge tectonics. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb086ib04p02763

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.