Seismicity, fault plane solutions, depth of faulting, and active tectonics of the Andes of Peru, Ecuador, and southern Colombia
Abstract
The intracontinental seismicity of the Andes of Peru, Ecuador, and southern Colombia is concentrated along the easternmost flank of the Cordillera beneath the western margin of the sub‐Andes. The focal depths and fault plane solutions of the largest events were constrained by comparing the observed long‐period P waves with synthetic waveforms. In general, the fault plane solutions show reverse faulting on steeply dipping nodal planes striking northwest–southeast and reflect crustal shortening perpendicular to the range, probably in response to the subduction of the Nazca plate to the west. Earthquakes in the sub‐Andes occur at depths of between 8 and 38 km, indicating that much of the crust deforms in a brittle manner. The seismicity seems to reflect antithetic underthrusting of the Brazilian shield beneath the eastern margin of the Andes. However, the earthquakes are too deep and their nodal planes are too steep to be associated with the thin‐skinned decollement of the sedimentary cover. Instead, they appear to reflect the tectonic deformation of the underthrust basement west of the zone of active deformation at the surface in the sub‐Andes. Hence the earthquakes on the east side of the Andes may reflect the style of deformation in the hinterland of fold and thrust belts, such as in the Canadian Rockies, while much of the decollement farther east occurs aseismically. In contrast, normal faulting occurs in the high Andes on planes parallel to the strike of the mountain belt.…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Modern seismicity shows active crustal shortening concentrated within the sub-Andean fold and thrust belt.
“Modern seismicity also shows active crustal shortening concentrated within the sub-Andean FTB.”
From Crustal shortening in the Andes: Why do GPS rates differ from geological rates? (2000) · cites this paper as Suarez et al., 1983
The shortening rate estimated from seismic moments of earthquakes is only 1-3 mm/yr, which is a minimum because aseismic deformation is not included and the sampling period may have missed infrequent very large earthquakes.
“The shortening rate estimated from the seismic moments of earthquakes is only 1-3 mm yr '• [Suarez et al., 1983], which is a minimum because aseismic deformation is not included in the calculations and the sampling period may have missed infrequent very large earthquakes.”
From Crustal shortening in the Andes: Why do GPS rates differ from geological rates? (2000) · cites this paper as Suarez et al., 1983
The locus of shortening has migrated east with time, from the Altiplano in the Miocene to its present position in the Sub-Andean zone.
“The locus of shortening has migrated east with time, from the Altiplano in the Miocene to its present position in the Sub-Andean zone [e.g., Suarez et al., 1983;Isacks, 1988].”
From Constraints on present‐day shortening rate across the central eastern Andes from GPS data (1997) · cites this paper as Suarez et al., 1983
Suarez et al. [1983] used rates of seismic energy release to suggest present-day shortening across the eastern Andes and sub-Andean belt at 1-2 mm/yr.
“Suarez et al. [1983] used rates of seismic energy release to suggest present-day shortening across the eastern Andes and sub-Andean belt at 1-2 mm/yr.”
From Constraints on present‐day shortening rate across the central eastern Andes from GPS data (1997) · cites this paper as Suarez et al., 1983
Cites
Parallel thrust and normal faulting in Peru and constraints on the state of stress
Dalmayrac, B., & Molnar, P. (1981) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/0012-821x(81)90174-6 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Uplift of the Central Andean Plateau and bending of the Bolivian Orocline
Isacks, B. L. (1988) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb093ib04p03211 · Cited by 1,113 · see citing works
Crustal shortening in the Andes: Why do GPS rates differ from geological rates?
Liu, M., Yang, Y., Stein, S., Zhu, Y., & Engeln, J. (2000) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2000gl008532 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Constraints on present‐day shortening rate across the central eastern Andes from GPS data
Leffler, L., Stein, S., Mao, A., Dixon, T., Ellis, M. A., Ocola, L., & Sacks, I. S. (1997) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/97gl00770 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Suárez, G., Molnar, P., & Burchfiel, B. C.
- ORCID
- Suárez, Gerardo
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1983-12-10
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- B12
- Pages
- 10403-10428
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096472884
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Tectonic Studies in Latin America
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › earthquake and tectonic studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide
- Keywords
- Andean subduction zone, earthquake source mechanism, focal depth, reverse faulting, crustal shortening, Nazca plate subduction, underthrusting, Brazilian Shield, fold and thrust belt, décollement, normal faulting, high Andes, active tectonics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review