The DOI matches its Crossref record.
History of the lunar orbit
Abstract
A method of calculating the past states of the earth‐moon system is developed. The method is based on the existence of three distinct time scales for dynamical change. The short time scale is determined by the revolution periods of the sun and moon about the earth or, equivalently, by the year and current month. The intermediate time scale is set by the precessional motions of the lunar orbit plane and the earth's equator plane. The rate at which tidal friction alters the state of the earth‐moon system defines the long time scale. The equations of motion governing the earth‐moon system are successively averaged over the short and then the intermediate time scales. These averaged equations are then integrated back a short interval on the long time scale. The equations of motion appropriate to this new state of the earth‐moon system are then re‐averaged on the short and intermediate time scales, and once again the averaged eqations are stepped back on the tidal time scale. The first step in this procedure (i.e. averaging on the short time scale) is performed analytically, whereas the calculations on the intermediate and long time scales require the use of a large computer. At present, the inclination of the lunar orbit plane to the ecliptic remains nearly constant during the precessional motion. On the other hand, if the moon's semimajor axis were ever less than 10 R⨁, the inclination of the lunar orbit plane would have maintained a fixed value with respect to the earth's equator plane. The current investigation shows that this inclination could never have been less than 10° and, therefore, that the moon could never have moved on an equatorial orbit. This result contradicts theories that postulate fission of the earth to form the moon and also those which propose that the moon formed by accretion within 10 R⨁
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Making the Moon from a Fast-Spinning Earth: A Giant Impact Followed by Resonant Despinning
Ćuk, M., & Stewart, S. T. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225542 · Cited by 680
The chaotic obliquity of the planets
Laskar, J., & Robutel, P. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/361608a0 · Cited by 499
Emergence of a Habitable Planet
Zahnle, K., Arndt, N., Cockell, C., Halliday, A., Nisbet, E., Selsis, F., & Sleep, N. H. (2007) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11214-007-9225-z · Cited by 380
Geological constraints on the Precambrian history of Earth's rotation and the Moon's orbit
Williams, G. E. (2000) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/1999rg900016 · Cited by 349
Physics of bodily tides in terrestrial planets and the appropriate scales of dynamical evolution
Efroimsky, M., & Lainey, V. (2007) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/2007je002908 · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldreich, P.
- Venue
- Reviews of Geophysics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1966-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 411-439
- ISSN
- 0096-1043 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-1209
- 1944-9208
- OpenAlex
- W1999093968
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: History of the lunar orbit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/rg004i004p00411
- The paper
- Goldreich, P. (1966). History of the lunar orbit. Reviews of Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1029/rg004i004p00411
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.