Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 406

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Volcanism on Mars

Greeley, Ronald, Spudis, Paul D.·1981·Reviews of Geophysics

Abstract

More than 15 years of planetary exploration of Mars have given insight into the geologic processes that have shaped its surface. The newly acquired Viking data have shown that volcanism is one of the most important geologic processes operating on Mars throughout its history. In situ chemical analyses of Martian soil by the Viking lander spacecraft indicate mafic to ultramafic source rocks. This is consistent both with available remote sensing data, which indicate the presence of mafic minerals such as pyroxene and olivine, and with petrologic modeling, based on available geophysical data which suggest that Martian lavas are probably iron rich and ultramafic. These data strongly suggest that basaltic volcanism is widespread on Mars, and much of the photogeological data may be studied in this context. Photogeological analysis of the Martian surface has shown two main types of volcanic morphologies: the first type is central volcanoes, which are volcanic landforms developed by continued and prolonged eruption from a point source vent. This category includes (1) shields, the classic low‐profile volcanic mountains of which Olympus Mons is the most spectacular example, (2) domes, steep‐sided constructs, such as Tharsis Tholus, that may represent lower rates of eruption than the shields or, possibly, more silicic lava compositions, (3) highland patera, radially textured low‐profile volcanoes that occur in the cratered terrain and are interpreted as ash shields, (4) Alba Patera, an apparently unique volcanic landform consisting of a vast volcanic center over 1500 km across with flank slopes of less than a tenth of a degree, and (5) various small features such as cinder cones. The second major category is volcanic plains, which are units recognized by several criteria, of which the presence of mare ridges and flow lobes are the most useful. Volcanic plains are subdivided into four main groups: (1) simple flows, broad, smooth to rolling plains that contain numerous mare‐type ridges but no flow lobes, interpreted as being composed of thick, single‐cooling units, (2) complex flows, displaying multiple overlapping flow lobes interpreted to be indicative of thin, multiple‐cooling units, (3) undifierentiated flows, plains that typically lack any morphologic identifying feature but are considered to be volcanic partly on the basis of their association with large volcanic centers, and (4) questionable plains, volcanic(?) units heavily modified by other processes (erosion, tectonism, etc.) so that their origins are uncertain. When these categories of volcanic morphologies are combined with relative age data provided by crater statistics, a volcanic history for Mars can be derived as follows: Early heavy bombardment of Mars was accompanied and followed by small‐scale fluvial channeling, extensive flood volcanism (the plateau plains), and ash shield volcanism in the cratered terrain. Shortly after this time, less extensive flood volcanism continued to resurface the planet during formation of the northern/southern hemisphere dichotomy. Central volcanism became more prominent with the development of the Alba Patera center as well as the older shields and domes of the northern hemisphere (early Tharsis and Elysium regions). The development of the Tharsis and Elysium uplifts may have triggered the release of large‐scale catastrophic floods, producing large channels. Continued uplift and lithospheric thinning concentrated volcanic activity in the Tharsis region, producing large shield volcanoes and extensive lava plains. Both central vent and plains volcanism have been active throughout Martian history, but the volumes of extrusion have gradually decreased with time. This is consistent with a moonlike thermal history involving a lithosphere of increasing thickness with time, gradually ‘turning off’ the volcanism. Although many questions remain regarding Martian volcanism, the Viking data have provided a remarkable, detailed overview of the probable nature of the volcanic history of Mars.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/rg019i001p00013

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 406

Metadata

Authors
Greeley, R., & Spudis, P. D.
Venue
Reviews of Geophysics
Published
1981-02
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
13-41
ISSN
  • 0096-1043 (ISSN-L)
  • 8755-1209
  • 1944-9208
OpenAlex
W1969376448
Cited by
406
References
0
FWCI
16.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Volcanism on Mars. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/rg019i001p00013
The paper
Greeley, R., & Spudis, P. D. (1981). Volcanism on Mars. Reviews of Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1029/rg019i001p00013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.