The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phosphate sensing in higher plants
Abstract
Phosphate (Pi) plays a central role as reactant and effector molecule in plant cell metabolism. However, Pi is the least accessible macronutrient in many ecosystems and its low availability often limits plant growth. Plants have evolved an array of molecular and morphological adaptations to cope with Pi limitation, which include dramatic changes in gene expression and root development to facilitate Pi acquisition and recycling. Although physiological responses to Pi starvation have been increasingly studied and understood, the initial molecular events that monitor and transmit information on external and internal Pi status remain to be elucidated in plants. This review summarizes molecular and developmental Pi starvation responses of higher plants and the evidence for coordinated regulation of gene expression, followed by a discussion of the potential involvement of plant hormones in Pi sensing and of molecular genetic approaches to elucidate plant signalling of low Pi availability. Complementary genetic strategies in Arabidopsis thaliana have been developed that are expected to identify components of plant signal transduction pathways involved in Pi sensing. Innovative screening methods utilize reporter gene constructs, conditional growth on organophosphates and the inhibitory properties of the Pi analogue phosphite, which hold the promise for significant advances in our understanding of the complex mechanisms by which plants regulate Pi‐starvation responses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Westheimer, F. H. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2434996 · Cited by 1,711
Cited by
Raghothama, K. G., & Karthikeyan, A. S. (2005) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-004-2005-6 · Cited by 1,640
Small RNAs as big players in plant abiotic stress responses and nutrient deprivation
Sunkar, R., Chinnusamy, V., Zhu, J., & Zhu, J.-K. (2007) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2007.05.001 · Cited by 927
Responses of root architecture development to low phosphorus availability: a review
Niu, Y. F., Chai, R. S., Jin, G. L., Wang, H., Tang, C. X., & Zhang, Y. S. (2013) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcs285 · Cited by 617
The Arabidopsis SUMO E3 ligase SIZ1 controls phosphate deficiency responses
Miura, K., Rus, A., Sharkhuu, A., Yokoi, S., Karthikeyan, A. S., Raghothama, K. G., Baek, D., Koo, Y. D., Jin, J. B., Bressan, R. A., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0500778102 · Cited by 599
In Posidonia oceanica cadmium induces changes in DNA methylation and chromatin patterning
Greco, M., Chiappetta, A., Bruno, L., & Bitonti, M. B. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/err313 · Cited by 538
Metadata
- Authors
- Abel, S., Ticconi, C. A., & Delatorre, C. A.
- Venue
- Physiologia Plantarum
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 0031-9317 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3054
- OpenAlex
- W1968593157
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phosphate sensing in higher plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1150101.x
- The paper
- Abel, S., Ticconi, C. A., & Delatorre, C. A. (2002). Phosphate sensing in higher plants. Physiologia Plantarum. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1150101.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.