The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Topiramate, carbamazepine and valproate monotherapy: double-blind comparison in newly diagnosed epilepsy: Topiramate monotherapy comparison trial
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare topiramate (TPM) with investigator's choice of carbamazepine (CBZ) or valproate (VPA) for initial treatment in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In patients with epilepsy diagnosed within previous 3 months, investigators selected CBZ (600 mg/day) or VPA (1250 mg/day) as preferred therapy based on the patient's clinical presentation. Based on investigators' treatment choice, patients (n=613) were assigned to the CBZ or VPA treatment branch. Within each branch, patients were randomized to double-blind treatment with the traditional antiepileptic drugs (CBZ or VPA), TPM 100 mg/day, or TPM 200 mg/day. Patients continued double-blind treatment until exiting the study or until 6 months after last patient randomized. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences between fixed doses of TPM and CBZ or VPA were observed in efficacy measures: time to exit, time to first seizure, and the proportion of patients seizure-free during the last 6 months of treatment. TPM 100 mg/day was associated with the fewest discontinuations due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: In patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy, an initial target dose of TPM 100 mg/day is at least as effective as therapeutic doses of CBZ and VPA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The combination of estimates from different experiments
Cochran, W. G. (1954) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001666 · Cited by 5,380
Cited by
Marson, A. G., Al-Kharusi, A. M., Alwaidh, M., Appleton, R., Baker, G. A., Chadwick, D. W., Cramp, C., Cockerell, O. C., Cooper, P. N., Doughty, J., et al. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60460-7 · Cited by 976
Self-citationGuerrini, R. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68182-8 · Cited by 848
Glauser, T., Ben‐Menachem, E., Bourgeois, B., Cnaan, A., Guerreiro, C., Kälviäinen, R., Mattson, R., French, J. A., Perucca, E., Tomson, T., et al. (2013) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.12074 · Cited by 721
Self-citationNew avenues for anti-epileptic drug discovery and development
Löscher, W., Klitgaard, H., Twyman, R. E., & Schmidt, D. (2013) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4126 · Cited by 675
French, J. A., Kanner, A. M., Bautista, J., Abou-Khalil, B., Browne, T., Harden, C. L., Theodore, W. H., Bazil, C., Stern, J., Schachter, S. C., et al. (2004) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000123693.82339.fc · Cited by 654
Metadata
- Authors
- Privitera, M. D., Brodie, M. J., Mattson, R. H., Chadwick, D. W., Neto, W., Wang, S., & for the EPMN 105 Study Group
- Venue
- Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 165-175
- ISSN
- 0001-6314 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168915562
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Topiramate, carbamazepine and valproate monotherapy: double-blind comparison in newly diagnosed epilepsy: Topiramate monotherapy comparison trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0404.2003.00093.x
- The paper
- Privitera, M. D., Brodie, M. J., Mattson, R. H., Chadwick, D. W., Neto, W., Wang, S., & for the EPMN 105 Study Group. (2003). Topiramate, carbamazepine and valproate monotherapy: double-blind comparison in newly diagnosed epilepsy: Topiramate monotherapy comparison trial. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0404.2003.00093.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.