Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 721

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Updated ILAE evidence review of antiepileptic drug efficacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes

Open access
Glauser, Tracy, Ben‐Menachem, Elinor, Bourgeois, Blaise, Cnaan, Avital, Guerreiro, Carlos, Kälviäinen, Reetta, Mattson, Richard, French, Jacqueline A., Perucca, Emilio, Tomson, Torbjorn, for the ILAE Subcommission on AED Guidelines·2013·Epilepsia

Abstract

Summary: The purpose of this report was to update the 2006 International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) report and identify the level of evidence for long‐term efficacy or effectiveness for antiepileptic drugs (AED s) as initial monotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed or untreated epilepsy. All applicable articles from J uly 2005 until M arch 2012 were identified, evaluated, and combined with the previous analysis (Glauser et al., 2006) to provide a comprehensive update. The prior analysis methodology was utilized with three modifications: (1) the detectable noninferiority boundary approach was dropped and both failed superiority studies and prespecified noninferiority studies were analyzed using a noninferiority approach, (2) the definition of an adequate comparator was clarified and now includes an absolute minimum point estimate for efficacy/effectiveness, and (3) the relationship table between clinical trial ratings, level of evidence, and conclusions no longer includes a recommendation column to reinforce that this review of efficacy/evidence for specific seizure types does not imply treatment recommendations. This evidence review contains one clarification: The commission has determined that class I superiority studies can be designed to detect up to a 20% absolute (rather than relative) difference in the point estimate of efficacy/effectiveness between study treatment and comparator using an intent‐to‐treat analysis. Since J uly, 2005, three class I randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 11 class III RCT s have been published. The combined analysis (1940–2012) now includes a total of 64 RCT s (7 with class I evidence, 2 with class II evidence) and 11 meta‐analyses. New efficacy/effectiveness findings include the following: levetiracetam and zonisamide have level A evidence in adults with partial onset seizures and both ethosuximide and valproic acid have level A evidence in children with childhood absence epilepsy. There are no major changes in the level of evidence for any other subgroup. Levetiracetam and zonisamide join carbamazepine and phenytoin with level A efficacy/effectiveness evidence as initial monotherapy for adults with partial onset seizures. Although ethosuximide and valproic acid now have level A efficacy/effectiveness evidence as initial monotherapy for children with absence seizures, there continues to be an alarming lack of well designed, properly conducted epilepsy RCT s for patients with generalized seizures/epilepsies and in children in general. These findings reinforce the need for multicenter, multinational efforts to design, conduct, and analyze future clinically relevant adequately designed RCT s. When selecting a patient's AED, all relevant variables and not just efficacy and effectiveness should be considered.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/epi.12074

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 76

  1. 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00485.x · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0920-1211(97)00024-7 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bourgeois B, 1998, Gabapentin(Neurontin) monotherapy in children with benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes(BECTS): a 36‐week, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study, Epilepsia, 39, 163
  4. 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90581-2 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/S0920-1211(99)00039-X · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2002.45401.x · DOI
  7. 10.1006/ebeh.2002.0337 · DOI
  8. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000252941.50833.4a · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1982.tb13703.x · DOI
  10. 10.1136/jnnp.48.7.639 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)10531-7 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1212/WNL.51.5.1282 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/S0920-1211(96)01013-3 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.40903.x · doi:10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.40903.x
  15. 10.1016/j.braindev.2006.09.008 · DOI
  16. Dam M, 1989, A double‐blind study comparing oxcarbazepine and carbamazepine in patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated epilepsy, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 52, 472
  17. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90074-4 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.seizure.2011.04.005 · doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2011.04.005
  19. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02976.x · DOI
  20. 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91176-U · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1999.tb00805.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000210517.03902.6e · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000210517.03902.6e
  23. Gamble CL, 2006, Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD001031
  24. 10.1016/S0387-7604(99)00113-8 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1136/jnnp.45.12.1113 · doi:10.1136/jnnp.45.12.1113
  26. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000048200.12663.BC · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00585.x · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1177/0883073807303997 · DOI
  29. 10.1056/NEJMoa0902014 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/S0920-1211(97)00025-9 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1998.tb05118.x · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1136/jnnp.58.1.44 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1001/archneur.1995.00540340081016 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Koch MW, 2009, Oxcarbazepine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for partial onset seizures, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD006453
  35. 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70154-5 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2007.03.003 · DOI
  37. Loiseau P, 1984, [Efficacy of sodium valproate in partial epilepsy. Crossed study of valproate and carbamazepine], Rev Neurol, 140, 434
  38. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60460-7 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60461-9 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.3310/hta11370 · DOI
  41. Martinovic Z, 1983, Advances in epileptology, XIVth epilepsy international symposium, 301
  42. 10.1056/NEJM198507183130303 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1056/NEJM199209103271104 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1981.tb06152.x · DOI
  45. Muller M, 2006, Oxcarbazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD003615
  46. 10.1016/S0920-1211(01)00271-6 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)06250-8 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/0920-1211(93)90048-C · DOI
  49. Posner E, Absence seizures in children, Clin Evid
  50. Posner EB, 2003, Ethosuximide, sodium valproate or lamotrigine for absence seizures in children and adolescents, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD003032
  51. Posner EB, 2005, Ethosuximide, sodium valproate or lamotrigine for absence seizures in children and adolescents, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD003032
  52. 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2003.00093.x · DOI
  53. 10.1212/WNL.33.7.904 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/S0896-6974(05)80021-0 · DOI
  55. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02670.x · DOI
  56. Rastogi P, 1991, Comparison of sodium valproate and phenytoin as single drug treatment in generalised and partial epilepsy, J Assoc Physicians India, 39, 606
  57. 10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb04606.x · DOI
  58. 10.1016/0920-1211(95)00085-2 · DOI
  59. 10.1136/jnnp.57.6.682 · DOI
  60. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000167384.68207.3E · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01128.x · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1212/WNL.32.2.157 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1981.tb04330.x · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1981.tb04330.x
  64. Sobaniec W, 2005, A comparative study of vigabatrin vs. carbamazepine in monotherapy of newly diagnosed partial seizures in children, Pharmacol Rep, 57, 646
  65. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02233.x · DOI
  66. 10.1001/archneurpsyc.1940.02280010078005 · doi:10.1001/archneurpsyc.1940.02280010078005
  67. 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1999.tb05562.x · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1016/j.seizure.2005.09.011 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/S0920-1211(96)00074-5 · doi:10.1016/s0920-1211(96)00074-5
  70. Thilothammal N, 1996, Comparison of phenobarbitone, phenytoin with sodium valproate: randomized, double‐blind study, Indian Pediatr, 33, 549
  71. 10.1177/088307389601100611 · doi:10.1177/088307389601100611
  72. 10.1136/jnnp.45.1.55 · DOI
  73. 10.1136/bmj.290.6471.815 · DOI
  74. 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1995.tb11978.x · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1177/08830738040190020901 · DOI
  76. 10.1001/archneur.56.5.605 · DOI

Cited by

See all 721

Metadata

Authors
Glauser, T., Ben‐Menachem, E., Bourgeois, B., Cnaan, A., Guerreiro, C., Kälviäinen, R., Mattson, R., French, J. A., Perucca, E., Tomson, T., & Guidelines, F. T. I. S. O. A.
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01-25
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
551-563
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W2143243043
Cited by
721
References
2
FWCI
38.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Updated ILAE evidence review of antiepileptic drug efficacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/epi.12074
The paper
Glauser, T., Ben‐Menachem, E., Bourgeois, B., Cnaan, A., Guerreiro, C., Kälviäinen, R., Mattson, R., French, J. A., Perucca, E., Tomson, T., & Guidelines, F. T. I. S. O. A. (2013). Updated ILAE evidence review of antiepileptic drug efficacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes. Epilepsia. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.12074

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.