The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Updated ILAE evidence review of antiepileptic drug efficacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes
Open accessAbstract
Summary: The purpose of this report was to update the 2006 International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) report and identify the level of evidence for long‐term efficacy or effectiveness for antiepileptic drugs (AED s) as initial monotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed or untreated epilepsy. All applicable articles from J uly 2005 until M arch 2012 were identified, evaluated, and combined with the previous analysis (Glauser et al., 2006) to provide a comprehensive update. The prior analysis methodology was utilized with three modifications: (1) the detectable noninferiority boundary approach was dropped and both failed superiority studies and prespecified noninferiority studies were analyzed using a noninferiority approach, (2) the definition of an adequate comparator was clarified and now includes an absolute minimum point estimate for efficacy/effectiveness, and (3) the relationship table between clinical trial ratings, level of evidence, and conclusions no longer includes a recommendation column to reinforce that this review of efficacy/evidence for specific seizure types does not imply treatment recommendations. This evidence review contains one clarification: The commission has determined that class I superiority studies can be designed to detect up to a 20% absolute (rather than relative) difference in the point estimate of efficacy/effectiveness between study treatment and comparator using an intent‐to‐treat analysis. Since J uly, 2005, three class I randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 11 class III RCT s have been published. The combined analysis (1940–2012) now includes a total of 64 RCT s (7 with class I evidence, 2 with class II evidence) and 11 meta‐analyses. New efficacy/effectiveness findings include the following: levetiracetam and zonisamide have level A evidence in adults with partial onset seizures and both ethosuximide and valproic acid have level A evidence in children with childhood absence epilepsy. There are no major changes in the level of evidence for any other subgroup. Levetiracetam and zonisamide join carbamazepine and phenytoin with level A efficacy/effectiveness evidence as initial monotherapy for adults with partial onset seizures. Although ethosuximide and valproic acid now have level A efficacy/effectiveness evidence as initial monotherapy for children with absence seizures, there continues to be an alarming lack of well designed, properly conducted epilepsy RCT s for patients with generalized seizures/epilepsies and in children in general. These findings reinforce the need for multicenter, multinational efforts to design, conduct, and analyze future clinically relevant adequately designed RCT s. When selecting a patient's AED, all relevant variables and not just efficacy and effectiveness should be considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baulac, M., Brodie, M. J., Patten, A., Segieth, J., & Giorgi, L. (2012) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70105-9 · Cited by 186
Research works printed but not linked: 76
- 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00485.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0920-1211(97)00024-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Bourgeois B, 1998, Gabapentin(Neurontin) monotherapy in children with benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes(BECTS): a 36‐week, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study, Epilepsia, 39, 163
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90581-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0920-1211(99)00039-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2002.45401.x · DOI
- 10.1006/ebeh.2002.0337 · DOI
- 10.1212/01.wnl.0000252941.50833.4a · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1982.tb13703.x · DOI
- 10.1136/jnnp.48.7.639 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)10531-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/WNL.51.5.1282 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0920-1211(96)01013-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.40903.x · doi:10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.40903.x
- 10.1016/j.braindev.2006.09.008 · DOI
- Dam M, 1989, A double‐blind study comparing oxcarbazepine and carbamazepine in patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated epilepsy, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 52, 472
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90074-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.seizure.2011.04.005 · doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2011.04.005
- 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02976.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91176-U · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1999.tb00805.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/01.wnl.0000210517.03902.6e · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000210517.03902.6e
- Gamble CL, 2006, Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD001031
- 10.1016/S0387-7604(99)00113-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/jnnp.45.12.1113 · doi:10.1136/jnnp.45.12.1113
- 10.1212/01.WNL.0000048200.12663.BC · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00585.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0883073807303997 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa0902014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0920-1211(97)00025-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1998.tb05118.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/jnnp.58.1.44 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/archneur.1995.00540340081016 · DOI · Paper page
- Koch MW, 2009, Oxcarbazepine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for partial onset seizures, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD006453
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70154-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.yebeh.2007.03.003 · DOI
- Loiseau P, 1984, [Efficacy of sodium valproate in partial epilepsy. Crossed study of valproate and carbamazepine], Rev Neurol, 140, 434
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60460-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60461-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3310/hta11370 · DOI
- Martinovic Z, 1983, Advances in epileptology, XIVth epilepsy international symposium, 301
- 10.1056/NEJM198507183130303 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJM199209103271104 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1981.tb06152.x · DOI
- Muller M, 2006, Oxcarbazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD003615
- 10.1016/S0920-1211(01)00271-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)06250-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/0920-1211(93)90048-C · DOI
- Posner E, Absence seizures in children, Clin Evid
- Posner EB, 2003, Ethosuximide, sodium valproate or lamotrigine for absence seizures in children and adolescents, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD003032
- Posner EB, 2005, Ethosuximide, sodium valproate or lamotrigine for absence seizures in children and adolescents, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD003032
- 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2003.00093.x · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.33.7.904 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6974(05)80021-0 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02670.x · DOI
- Rastogi P, 1991, Comparison of sodium valproate and phenytoin as single drug treatment in generalised and partial epilepsy, J Assoc Physicians India, 39, 606
- 10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb04606.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0920-1211(95)00085-2 · DOI
- 10.1136/jnnp.57.6.682 · DOI
- 10.1212/01.WNL.0000167384.68207.3E · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01128.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/WNL.32.2.157 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1981.tb04330.x · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1981.tb04330.x
- Sobaniec W, 2005, A comparative study of vigabatrin vs. carbamazepine in monotherapy of newly diagnosed partial seizures in children, Pharmacol Rep, 57, 646
- 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02233.x · DOI
- 10.1001/archneurpsyc.1940.02280010078005 · doi:10.1001/archneurpsyc.1940.02280010078005
- 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1999.tb05562.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.seizure.2005.09.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0920-1211(96)00074-5 · doi:10.1016/s0920-1211(96)00074-5
- Thilothammal N, 1996, Comparison of phenobarbitone, phenytoin with sodium valproate: randomized, double‐blind study, Indian Pediatr, 33, 549
- 10.1177/088307389601100611 · doi:10.1177/088307389601100611
- 10.1136/jnnp.45.1.55 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.290.6471.815 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1995.tb11978.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/08830738040190020901 · DOI
- 10.1001/archneur.56.5.605 · DOI
Cited by
Drug treatment of epilepsy in adults
Schmidt, D., & Schachter, S. C. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g254 · Cited by 323
The Pharmacoresistant Epilepsy: An Overview on Existent and New Emerging Therapies
Fattorusso, A., Matricardi, S., Mencaroni, E., Dell'Isola, G. B., Di Cara, G., Striano, P., & Verrotti, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.674483 · Cited by 269
Tomson, T., Battino, D., & Perucca, E. (2016) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00314-2 · Cited by 266
Self-citation(2016) · Handbook of Clinical Neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802997-8.00016-5 · Cited by 244
Wang, Y., Ying, X., Chen, L., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Liang, J., Xu, C., Guo, Y., Wang, S., Hu, W., et al. (2016) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1007/s13311-016-0431-9 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Glauser, T., Ben‐Menachem, E., Bourgeois, B., Cnaan, A., Guerreiro, C., Kälviäinen, R., Mattson, R., French, J. A., Perucca, E., Tomson, T., & Guidelines, F. T. I. S. O. A.
- Venue
- Epilepsia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-01-25
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 551-563
- ISSN
- 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-1167
- OpenAlex
- W2143243043
- Cited by
- 721
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 38.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Updated ILAE evidence review of antiepileptic drug efficacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/epi.12074
- The paper
- Glauser, T., Ben‐Menachem, E., Bourgeois, B., Cnaan, A., Guerreiro, C., Kälviäinen, R., Mattson, R., French, J. A., Perucca, E., Tomson, T., & Guidelines, F. T. I. S. O. A. (2013). Updated ILAE evidence review of antiepileptic drug efficacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes. Epilepsia. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.12074
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.