Cited by 850Epilepsy research and treatmentPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesDiet and metabolism studies

Epilepsy in children

Guerrini, Renzo·2006·The Lancet

Abstract

10.5 million children worldwide are estimated to have active epilepsy. Over the past 15 years, syndrome-oriented clinical and EEG diagnosis, and better aetiological diagnosis, especially supported by neuroimaging, has helped to clarify the diversity of epilepsy in children, and has improved management. Perinatal and postinfective encephalopathy, cortical dysplasia, and hippocampal sclerosis account for the most severe symptomatic epilepsies. Ion channel defects can underlie both benign age-related disorders and severe epileptic encephalopathies with a progressive disturbance in cerebral function. However, the reasons for age-related expression in children are not understood. Neither are the mechanisms whereby an epileptic encephalopathy originates. Several new drugs have been recently introduced but have provided limited therapeutic benefits. However, treatment and quality of life have improved because the syndrome-specific efficacy profile of drugs is better known, and there is heightened awareness that compounds with severe cognitive side-effects and heavy polytherapies should be avoided. Epilepsy surgery is an important option for a few well-selected individuals, but should be considered with great caution when there is no apparent underlying brain lesion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68182-8

Cites

317 of 317 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Simply adopting a protocol reduces mortality and morbidity, although there is little evidence to show that one of the numerous recommended protocols is better than another.

    “This is a delicate matter, as simply adopting a protocol reduces mortality and morbidity, although there is little evidence to show that one of the numerous recommended protocols is better than another 211 .”

    From Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (2024) · cites this paper as [211]

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 321 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guerrini, R.
Affiliations
University of Pisa (IT)
Corresponding author
Guerrini, Renzo
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-02
Volume
367
Issue
9509
Pages
499-524
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2047243927
Cited by
848
References
321
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 33
FWCI
4.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
Keywords
pediatric epilepsy, epileptic encephalopathy, perinatal encephalopathy, cortical dysplasia, hippocampal sclerosis, ion channel disorders, benign rolandic epilepsy, antiepileptic drugs, epilepsy surgery, etiology, neuroimaging, EEG diagnosis, cognitive side effects
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anticonvulsants, Child, Child, Preschool, Epilepsy, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Prognosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review