The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experimentally induced peri‐implant mucositis. A clinical study in humans.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and microbiological (microscopic) parameters during the development of experimental gingigivitis and experimental peri‐implant mucositis. Twenty partially edentulous patients were treated for moderate to advanced periodontal disease. Following active periodontal therapy consisting of motivation, instruction in oral hygiene practices, scaling and root planing and periodontal surgery where indicated, IMZ oral implants were incorporated in posterior edentulous areas. After 3 months of healing, the prosthetic abutments were connected, and the patients were closely supervised for another 2 months of healing. At this time, baseline data were obtained. Re‐examinations were scheduled at 3 and 6 months. Following this, the patients were asked to refrain from oral hygiene practices for 3 weeks. At all examinations including the end of the period of no oral hygiene, the following clinical parameters were obtained: Plaque Index, Gingival Index and Sulcus Bleeding Index, all modified by Mombelli et al. (1987) probing pocket depths and recession in mm. Furthermore, submucosal/subgingival plaque samples were obtained and analyzed using phase contrast microscopy. At the end of the 3‐week period of plaque accumulation: optimal oral hygiene was reinstituted. There were no statistically significant differences between the mean values of all parameters at implant compared to tooth sites at any observation periods. The period of no oral hygiene demonstrated a similar cause‐effect relationship between the accumulation of bacteria1 plaque and the development of peri‐implant mucositis as established for the gingival units by the experimental gingivitis model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Definition and prevalence of peri‐implant diseases
Zitzmann, N. U., & Berglundh, T. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2008.01274.x · Cited by 1,112
Schwarz, F., Derks, J., Monje, A., & Wang, H. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/jcpe.12954 · Cited by 1,066
Schwarz, F., Derks, J., Monje, A., & Wang, H. (2018) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1002/jper.16-0350 · Cited by 723
Heitz‐Mayfield, L. J. A., & Salvi, G. E. (2018) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1002/jper.16-0488 · Cited by 307
Reliability of periodontal diagnostic tools for monitoring peri‐implant health and disease
Coli, P., Christiaens, V., Sennerby, L., & Bruyn, H. D. (2017) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/prd.12162 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Pontoriero, R., Tonelli, M. P., Carnevale, G., Mombelli, A., Nyman, S. R., & Lang, N. P.
- Venue
- Clinical Oral Implants Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 254-259
- ISSN
- 0905-7161 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0501
- OpenAlex
- W2009802459
- Cited by
- 552
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimentally induced peri‐implant mucositis. A clinical study in humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050409.x
- The paper
- Pontoriero, R., Tonelli, M. P., Carnevale, G., Mombelli, A., Nyman, S. R., & Lang, N. P. (1994). Experimentally induced peri‐implant mucositis. A clinical study in humans. Clinical Oral Implants Research. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050409.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.