The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The use of reduced healing times on ITI® implants with a sandblasted and acid‐etched (SLA) surface: Early results from clinical trials on ITI® SLA implants
Abstract
Summary: ITI® dental implants are available with two bone‐anchoring surfaces, a titanium plasma‐sprayed (TPS) surface, and a recently introduced sandblasted and acid‐etched (SLA) surface. Cell culture and animal tests demonstrate that the SLA surface stimulates bone cell differentiation and protein production, has large amounts of bone‐to‐implant contact, and results in large removal torque values in functional testing of the bone contact. As a result of these studies, a prospective human clinical trial was initiated to determine whether the 4.1 mm diameter SLA ITI® solid screw implants could be predictably and safely restored as early as six weeks after implant placement surgery. The protocol restricted the use of the reduced healing time to a) healthy patients with sufficient bone volume to surround the implant, and b) those patients who had good bone quality (classes I‐III) at the implant recipient site. Patients with poorer bone quality (class IV) did not have restorations until 12 weeks after implant placement. The clinical trial is an ongoing multicenter trial, with six centers in four countries, and with follow‐up over five years. The primary outcome variable was abutment placement with a 35 Ncm force, with no countertorque and no pain or rotation of the implant. A secondary outcome was implant success, as defined by no mobility, no persistent pain or infection, and no peri‐implant radiolucency. To date, 110 patients with 326 implants have completed the one‐year post‐loading recall visit, while 47 patients with 138 implants have completed the two‐year recall. Three implants were lost prior to abutment connection. Prosthetic restoration was commenced after shortened healing times on 307 implants. The success rate for these implants, as judged by abutment placement, was 99.3% (with an average healing time of 49 days). Life table analyses demonstrated an implant success rate of 99.1%, both for 329 implants at one year and for 138 implants at two years. In the 24‐month period after restoration, no implant losses were reported for the 138 implants. These results demonstrate that, under defined conditions, solid screw ITI® implants with an SLA endosseous surface can be restored after approximately six weeks of healing with a high predictability of success, defined by abutment placement at 35 Ncm without countertorque, and with subsequent implant success rates of greater than 99% two years after restoration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival
Cutler, S. J., & Ederer, F. (1958) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(58)90126-7 · Cited by 2,870
Buser, D., Weber, H. ‐., & Lang, N. P. (1990) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010105.x · Cited by 724
Self-citation
Cited by
Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration
Le Guéhennec, L., Soueidan, A., Layrolle, P., & Amouriq, Y. (2007) · Dental Materials · doi:10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.025 · Cited by 2,406
Enhanced Bone Apposition to a Chemically Modified SLA Titanium Surface
Buser, D., Broggini, N., Wieland, M., Schenk, R. K., Denzer, A. J., Cochran, D. L., Hoffmann, B., Lussi, A., & Steinemann, S. G. (2004) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/154405910408300704 · Cited by 1,202
Self-citationGittens, R. A., McLachlan, T., Olivares-Navarrete, R., Cai, Y., Berner, S., Tannenbaum, R., Schwartz, Z., Sandhage, K. H., & Boyan, B. D. (2011) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.029 · Cited by 827
Long-term (10-year) dental implant survival: A systematic review and sensitivity meta-analysis
Howe, M.-S., Keys, W., & Richards, D. (2019) · Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2019.03.008 · Cited by 555
Tambasco de Oliveira, P., & Nanci, A. (2004) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00539-8 · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Cochran, D. L., Buser, D., Ten Bruggenkate, C. M., Weingart, D., Taylor, T. M., Bernard, J., Peters, F., & Simpson, J. P.
- Venue
- Clinical Oral Implants Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 144-153
- ISSN
- 0905-7161 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0501
- OpenAlex
- W1507854122
- Cited by
- 568
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 25.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The use of reduced healing times on ITI® implants with a sandblasted and acid‐etched (SLA) surface: Early results from clinical trials on ITI® SLA implants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130204.x
- The paper
- Cochran, D. L., Buser, D., Ten Bruggenkate, C. M., Weingart, D., Taylor, T. M., Bernard, J., Peters, F., & Simpson, J. P. (2002). The use of reduced healing times on ITI® implants with a sandblasted and acid‐etched (SLA) surface: Early results from clinical trials on ITI® SLA implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130204.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.