The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The 500 Dalton rule for the skin penetration of chemical compounds and drugs
Abstract
Abstract: Human skin has unique properties of which functioning as a physicochemical barrier is one of the most apparent. The human integument is able to resist the penetration of many molecules. However, especially smaller molecules can surpass transcutaneously. They are able to go by the corneal layer, which is thought to form the main deterrent. We argue that the molecular weight (MW) of a compound must be under 500 Dalton to allow skin absorption. Larger molecules cannot pass the corneal layer. Arguments for this “500 Dalton rule” are; 1) virtually all common contact allergens are under 500 Dalton, larger molecules are not known as contact sensitizers. They cannot penetrate and thus cannot act as allergens in man; 2) the most commonly used pharmacological agents applied in topical dermatotherapy are all under 500 Dalton; 3) all known topical drugs used in transdermal drug‐delivery systems are under 500 Dalton. In addition, clinical experience with topical agents such as cyclosporine, tacrolimus and ascomycins gives further arguments for the reality of the 500 Dalton rule. For pharmaceutical development purposes, it seems logical to restrict the development of new innovative compounds to a MW of under 500 Dalton, when topical dermatological therapy or percutaneous systemic therapy or vaccination is the objective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Micro- and nanoplastic induced cellular toxicity in mammals: A review
Banerjee, A., & Shelver, W. L. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142518 · Cited by 492
Lai, Y., Cogen, A. L., Radek, K. A., Park, H. J., MacLeod, D. T., Leichtle, A., Ryan, A. F., Di Nardo, A., & Gallo, R. L. (2010) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/jid.2010.123 · Cited by 446
Advances in transdermal insulin delivery
Zhang, Y., Yu, J., Kahkoska, A. R., Wang, J., Buse, J. B., & Gu, Z. (2019) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.12.006 · Cited by 325
Palmer, B., & DeLouise, L. (2016) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules21121719 · Cited by 267
Microneedle-mediated transdermal drug delivery for treating diverse skin diseases
Yang, D., Chen, M., Sun, Y., Jin, Y., Lu, C., Pan, X., Quan, G., & Wu, C. (2021) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.004 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Bos, J. D., & Meinardi, M. M. H. M.
- Venue
- Experimental Dermatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 165-169
- ISSN
- 0906-6705 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0625
- OpenAlex
- W2081159973
- Cited by
- 1,465
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The 500 Dalton rule for the skin penetration of chemical compounds and drugs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0625.2000.009003165.x
- The paper
- Bos, J. D., & Meinardi, M. M. H. M. (2000). The 500 Dalton rule for the skin penetration of chemical compounds and drugs. Experimental Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0625.2000.009003165.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.