The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Particle deposition indoors: a review
Abstract
Particle deposition indoors has received increasing attention recently because of increasing concern about the effects of particle exposure on human health. Deposition is a positive phenomenon from the perspective of human health, as deposited particles cannot be inhaled unless resuspended. There are studies showing strong correlation between the prevalence of biological-origin airborne particles and the prevalence of some specific sick building syndrome (Menzies et al., 1998; Teeuw et al., 1994). In the literature, the amount of research effort put on particle deposition indoors which is directly related to human health and microcontamination control is far less than the amount of research on deposition in small diameter tube/channel. This is a summary of the full-length version which will appear on the home page. The full-length paper aims to provide an up-to-date revision for both experiment and modeling on particle deposition indoors. This paper summarizes the experimental studies for particle deposition indoors for non-industrial environments. In section 2, 'Background', an overview of the different mechanisms of particle deposition, focusing on indoor environments is addressed. In section 3, 'Experimental Study Review', a survey of aerosol deposition experiments in small experimental chambers and real houses (or large-scale chambers) is presented. Detailed experimental measurements are addressed for the real house studies. The experimental techniques of particle generation, particle labeling and detection methods are discussed. Although the present paper focuses on experimental studies, it would be more complete to include some discussions on the modeling of the term particle eddy diffusivity and it is reviewed in section 4, 'Modeling Review'.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effects of room furnishings and air speed on particle deposition rates indoors
Thatcher, T. L., Lai, A. C. K., Moreno-Jackson, R., Sextro, R. G., & Nazaroff, W. W. (2002) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(02)00157-7 · Cited by 416
Self-citationRelative contribution of outdoor and indoor particle sources to indoor concentrations
Abt, E., Suh, H. H., Catalano, P., & Koutrakis, P. (2000) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es990348y · Cited by 411
Cited by
Relationship between outdoor and indoor air quality in eight French schools
Blondeau, P., Iordache, V., Poupard, O., Genin, D., & Allard, F. (2005) · Indoor Air · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00263.x · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Lai, A. C. K.
- Venue
- Indoor Air
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-12-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 211-214
- ISSN
- 0905-6947 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169929842
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Particle deposition indoors: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0668.2002.01159.x
- The paper
- Lai, A. C. K. (2002). Particle deposition indoors: a review. Indoor Air. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0668.2002.01159.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.