The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Flammability and serotiny as strategies: correlated evolution in pines
Abstract
Fire may act as a selective force on plants both through its direct effects by killing or wounding susceptible individuals and through its effect on the environment: the post‐fire environment may select specific physiological traits or life histories. We used phylogenetic independent contrasts to test the hypothesis that fire has selected for correlated evolution among alternative suites of traits in pines: a survival/avoidance suite characterized by thick bark, height, and self‐pruning of dead branches; and a fire‐embracing strategy in which plants invest little into survival, exhibit traits which enhance flammability, and use fire as a means to cue seedling establishment to the post‐fire environment through serotinous cones. We created a set of alternative ‘supertree’ phylogenies for the genus Pinus from published sources. Using these alternative phylogenies, published ecological data for 38 pine species, and newly collected morphological data, we demonstrate that much variation in trait evolution occurs along a fire‐surviving/fire‐embracing axis. Pines vary in their susceptibility to ignition since a tree that retains dead branches is more likely to carry a fire into the canopy than a tree that self‐prunes. The evolution of increased flammability may have altered evolutionary trajectories prompting an evolutionary switch from a fire‐surviving to a fire‐embracing life history. Alternatively, the fire‐embracing strategy may in fact select for increased flammability to ensure canopy ignition and the realization of serotinous seed‐release.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels
Rothermel, R. C. (1972) · doi:10.2737/int-rp-115 · Cited by 2,247
The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies
Ragin, C. C. (2014) · doi:10.1525/9780520957350 · Cited by 2,130
Cited by
Lavorel, S., & Garnier, E. (2002) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.x · Cited by 3,452
Bowman, D. M. J. S., Balch, J. K., Artaxo, P., Bond, W. J., Carlson, J. M., Cochrane, M. A., D’Antonio, C. M., DeFries, R. S., Doyle, J. C., Harrison, S. P., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1163886 · Cited by 3,351
Fire as a global ‘herbivore’: the ecology and evolution of flammable ecosystems
BOND, W., & KEELEY, J. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.04.025 · Cited by 2,484
A Burning Story: The Role of Fire in the History of Life
Pausas, J. G., & Keeley, J. E. (2009) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2009.59.7.10 · Cited by 1,226
Fire as an evolutionary pressure shaping plant traits
Keeley, J. E., Pausas, J. G., Rundel, P. W., Bond, W. J., & Bradstock, R. A. (2011) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2011.04.002 · Cited by 1,176
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwilk, D. W., & Ackerly, D. D.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 326-336
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0706
- OpenAlex
- W2036750201
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flammability and serotiny as strategies: correlated evolution in pines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.940213.x
- The paper
- Schwilk, D. W., & Ackerly, D. D. (2001). Flammability and serotiny as strategies: correlated evolution in pines. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.940213.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.