Gender and social influence: A social psychological analysis.

Eagly, Alice H.·1983·American Psychologist

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Men and women are believed to differ in how influential and easily influenced they are: Men are thought to be more influential, and women more easily influenced. In natural settings, men and women tend to differ in these ways, but these differ-ences stem largely from formal status inequalities by which men are more likely than women to have high-status roles. Status is important because of the legitimate authority vested in high-status roles: Within appropriate limits, people of higher status are believed to have the right to make demands of those of lower status, and people of lower status are ex-pected to comply with these demands. Yet, small, stereotypic sex differences in leadership and social influence generally have been found in laboratory

Cites (74)

  1. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
    1990 · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems
  2. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
    Cohen, Jacob · 2013
  3. Men and Women of the Corporation.
    Strauss, George, Kanter, Rosabeth Moss · 1978 · Industrial and Labor Relations Review
  4. Men and Women of the Corporation
    Devanna, Mary Anne · 1978 · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
  5. The psychology of sex differences
    1975 · Behavior Therapy
  6. A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment.
    Deutsch, Morton, Gerard, Harold B. · 1955 · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
  7. Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority
    Asch, Solomon E. · 1956 · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied
  8. The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process
    Ross, Lee · 1977 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
  9. Meta-analysis in social research
    1982 · Evaluation and Program Planning
  10. Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View.
    Wenglinsky, Martin, Milgram, Stanley · 1975 · Contemporary Sociology

Show all 74 references

Cited by (17)

  1. Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: a theory of gender and health
    Courtenay, Will H · 2000 · Social Science & Medicine
  2. Marketing through Instagram influencers: the impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude
    De Veirman, Marijke, Cauberghe, Veroline, Hudders, Liselot · 2017 · International Journal of Advertising
  3. Rocky Roads to Transfer: Rethinking Mechanism of a Neglected Phenomenon
    Salomon, Gavriel, Perkins, David N. · 1989 · Educational Psychologist
  4. Gender and aggressive behavior: a meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature.
    Eagly, Alice H., Steffen, Valerie J. · 1986 · Psychological Bulletin
  5. Gender differences in narcissism: A meta-analytic review.
    Grijalva, Emily, Newman, Daniel A., Tay, Louis, Donnellan, M. Brent, Harms, P. D., Robins, Richard W., Yan, Taiyi · 2015 · Psychological Bulletin

See all 414

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender and social influence: A social psychological analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0003-066x.38.9.971
The paper
Eagly, A. H. (1983). Gender and social influence: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.38.9.971

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.