Cited by 2,548Digital Marketing and Social MediaConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationMarketing and Advertising Strategies

Marketing through Instagram influencers: the impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude

Open access
De Veirman, Marijke, Cauberghe, Veroline, Hudders, Liselot·2017·International Journal of Advertising

Abstract

Findings of two experimental studies show that Instagram influencers with high numbers of followers are found more likeable, partly because they are considered more popular. Important, only in limited cases, perceptions of popularity induced by the influencer's number of followers increase the influencer's perceived opinion leadership. However, if the influencer follows very few accounts him-/herself, this can negatively impact popular influencers’ likeability. Also, cooperating with influencers with high numbers of followers might not be the best marketing choice for promoting divergent products, as this decreases the brand's perceived uniqueness and consequently brand attitudes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Berger, J., Heath, C. (2007). Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 121-134.
  2. Campbell, C., Pitt, L. F., Parent, M., Berthan, P. R. (2011). Understanding consumer conversations around ads in a web 2.0 world. Journal of Advertising, 40(1), 87-102.
  3. Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., Gummadi, K. (2010). Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Washington D.C., USA.
  4. Chen, Y., Fay, S., Wang, Q. (2011). The Role Of Marketing In Social Media: How Online Consumer Reviews Evolve, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25(2), 85-94.
  5. Deval, H., Mantel, S. P., Kardes, F. R., Posavac, S. S. (2013). How naive theories drive opposing inferences from the same information. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 1185-1201.
  6. Dimofte, C. V., Forehand, M. R., Deshpandé, R. (2004). Ad schema incongruity as elicitor of ethnic self-awareness and differential advertising response. Journal of Advertising, 32(4), 7-17.
  7. Flynn, L. R., Goldsmith, R. E., Eastman, J. K. (1996). Opinion leaders and opinion seekers: Two new measurement scales. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(2), 137- 147.
  8. Graham, G. S. (2014). More Than Friends: Popularity on Facebook and its Role in Impression Formation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 358-372.
  9. Hellofs, L., Jacobson, R. (1999). Market share and customers' perceptions of quality: When can firms grow their way to higher versus lower quality. Journal of Marketing, 63, 16-25.
  10. Hwang, Y. (2015). Does opinion leadership increase the followers on Twitter. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 5(3), 258-264.
  11. Jin, S. A., Phua J. (2014). Following Celebrities' Tweets About Brands: The Impact of Twitter-Based Electronic Word-of-Mouth on Consumers' Source Credibility Perception, Buying Intention, and Social Identification With Celebrities., Journal of Advertising, 43(2), 181-195.
  12. Machleit, K. A., Eroglue, S. A., Mantel, S. P. (2000). Perceived retail crowding and shopping satisfaction: What modifies this relationship? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9 29-42.
  13. Netemeyer, R. G., Krishnan, B., Pullig, C., Wang, G., Yagci, M., Dean, D., Ricks, J., Wirth, F. (2004). Developing and validating measures of facets of customer-based brand equity. Journal of Business Research, 57, 209-224.
  14. Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers' perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39- 52.
  15. Posavac, S. S., Herzenstein, M., Karde, F. R., Sundaram, S. (2010). Profits and halos: The role of firm profitability information in consumer inference. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(3), 327-337.
  16. Romero, D. M., Galuba, W., Asur, S., Huberman, B. A. (2010). Influence and passivity in social media. Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Athens, Greece.
  17. Steinhart, Y., Kamins, M., Mazursky, D., Noy, A. (2014). Effects of product type and contextual cues on eliciting naive theories of popularity and exclusivity. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 472-483.
  18. Utz, S. (2010). Show me your friends and I will tell you what type of person you are: How one's profile, number of friends, and type of friends influence impression formation on social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(2), 314-335.
  19. Warren, C., Campbell, M. C. (2014). What makes things cool? How autonomy influences perceived coolness. Journal of Consumer Research, 41, 543-563.
  20. Williams, D. (2006). On and off the 'net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 11, 593-628
  21. Yoganarasimhan, H. (2012). Impact of Social Network Structure on Content Propagation -A Study using YouTube Data. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 10(1), 111-150.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L.
Affiliations
,
Venue
International Journal of Advertising
Published
2017-07-14
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
798-828
ISSN
  • 0265-0487 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-3948
OpenAlex
W2461399145
Cited by
2,548
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 323 · 2025: 461 · 2024: 436 · 2023: 368 · 2022: 313 · 2021: 297 · 2020: 210 · 2019: 104 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
243.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Journal of Advertising (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
Keywords
Instagram influencers, influencer marketing, follower count, perceived popularity, likeability, opinion leadership, brand attitude, brand uniqueness, social media marketing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review