Cited by 1,121Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesEducational and Psychological Assessments

Rocky Roads to Transfer: Rethinking Mechanism of a Neglected Phenomenon

Salomon, Gavriel, Perkins, David N.·1989·Educational Psychologist

Abstract

Recent findings of transfer and nontransfer in such areas as planning and problem management skills, computer programming instruction, and literacy-related cognitive skills reveal paradoxes that invite explanation. In this article, we separate the "how" of transfer—the mechanisms that lead to it—from the "what" of transfer—the kind of knowledge and skill that might get transferred. We argue that transfer occurs in two ways. Low-road transfer depends on extensive, varied practice and occurs by the automatic triggering of well-learned behavior in a new context. High-road transfer occurs by intentional mindful abstraction of something from one context and application in a new context. Such transfer can either be of the forward-reaching kind, whereby one mindfully abstracts basic elements in anticipation for later application, or of the backward-reaching kind, where one faces a new situation and deliberately searches for relevant knowledge already acquired. Findings of transfer or nontransfer reflect whether the conditions for either low-road or high-road transfer were met. Qualitative predictions stemming from this theory of the mechanisms of transfer are offered and discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15326985ep2402_1

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transfer tends to be difficult for learners.

    “Transfer, with its inherent requirement to link incoming stimuli to existing categories, tends to be difficult for learners”

    From A systematic review of interleaving as a concept learning strategy (2021) · cites this paper as Salomon and Perkins, 1989

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Venue
Educational Psychologist
Published
1989-03
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
113-142
ISSN
  • 0046-1520 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6985
OpenAlex
W2082689007
Cited by
1,121
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 53
FWCI
22.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Psychologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
Keywords
transfer of learning, automaticity, practice, planning skills, programming education, literacy, cognitive skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review