Young children and adults use lexical principles to learn new nouns.
Abstract
In two experiments, adults and children were tested in an object-selection task that examined whether Ss would (a) map a novel word onto a previously unnamed object and (b) extend the newly learned word to another exemplar. Experiment 3 was a control study. Ss overwhelmingly selected the novel object as the referent for the novel term, even though the new label was never explicitly linked to the novel object. Ss also extended the new term and allowed it to preempt yet another novel label from applying to the just-named object. The existence of several lexical principles and the power of indirect word learning is supported. Consider the problem that faces the language-learning child, arguably an alien among expert speakers. How is the child to decide what a new word means? As Quine (1960) noted, there are an infinite number of logical possibilities for the meaning of a new term, none of which can be unambiguously attested to by ostensive naming. Yet, children do not seem to give equal weight to these alternatives. If they did, two well-known phe-nomena would probably not exist: (a) fast mapping, or one-trial
Cites (24)
- Untitled work1960 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
- Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of wordsMarkman, Ellen M, Wachtel, Gwyn F · 1988 · Cognitive Psychology
- Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in CategorizationUlric Neisser · 1989 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
- The importance of shape in early lexical learningLandau, Barbara, Smith, Linda B., Jones, Susan S. · 1988 · Cognitive Development
- Acquiring a Single New WordSusan E. Carey, Elsa Jaffe Bartlett · 1978
- One Word at a Time: The Use of Single Word Utterances before SyntaxBranigan, George, Bloom, Lois · 1977 · Language
- Children’s Language2021 · Psychology Press eBooks
- The Principle of Contrast: A Constraint on Language Acquisition2014 · Mechanisms of Language Acquisition
- Children's sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: Taxonomic versus thematic relationsMarkman, Ellen M., Hutchinson, Jean E. · 1984 · Cognitive Psychology
- The Mutual Exclusivity Bias in Children's Word LearningMerriman, William E., Bowman, Laura L., MacWhinney, Brian · 1989 · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development
Cited by (13)
- AT THE INTERFACE: DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS OF EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT LANGUAGE KNOWLEDGEEllis, Nick C. · 2005 · Studies in Second Language Acquisition
- Individuation, relativity, and early word learningGentner, Dedre, Boroditsky, Lera · 2001 · Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development
- Semantic Relations and the Lexicon: Antonymy, Synonymy and other ParadigmsMurphy, M. Lynne · 2003 · Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Children's avoidance of lexical overlap: A pragmatic account.Diesendruck, Gil, Markson, Lori · 2001 · Developmental Psychology
- Fast Mapping but Poor Retention by 24‐Month‐Old InfantsHorst, Jessica S., Samuelson, Larissa K. · 2008 · Infancy
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Young children and adults use lexical principles to learn new nouns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0012-1649.28.1.99
- The paper
- Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Bailey, L. M., & Wenger, N. R. (1992). Young children and adults use lexical principles to learn new nouns. Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.28.1.99
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.