Young children and adults use lexical principles to learn new nouns.

Golinkoff, Roberta M., Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy, Bailey, Leslie M., Wenger, Neill R.·1992·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

In two experiments, adults and children were tested in an object-selection task that examined whether Ss would (a) map a novel word onto a previously unnamed object and (b) extend the newly learned word to another exemplar. Experiment 3 was a control study. Ss overwhelmingly selected the novel object as the referent for the novel term, even though the new label was never explicitly linked to the novel object. Ss also extended the new term and allowed it to preempt yet another novel label from applying to the just-named object. The existence of several lexical principles and the power of indirect word learning is supported. Consider the problem that faces the language-learning child, arguably an alien among expert speakers. How is the child to decide what a new word means? As Quine (1960) noted, there are an infinite number of logical possibilities for the meaning of a new term, none of which can be unambiguously attested to by ostensive naming. Yet, children do not seem to give equal weight to these alternatives. If they did, two well-known phe-nomena would probably not exist: (a) fast mapping, or one-trial

Cites (24)

  1. Untitled work
    1960 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
  2. Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words
    Markman, Ellen M, Wachtel, Gwyn F · 1988 · Cognitive Psychology
  3. Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization
    Ulric Neisser · 1989 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
  4. The importance of shape in early lexical learning
    Landau, Barbara, Smith, Linda B., Jones, Susan S. · 1988 · Cognitive Development
  5. Acquiring a Single New Word
    Susan E. Carey, Elsa Jaffe Bartlett · 1978
  6. One Word at a Time: The Use of Single Word Utterances before Syntax
    Branigan, George, Bloom, Lois · 1977 · Language
  7. Children’s Language
    2021 · Psychology Press eBooks
  8. The Principle of Contrast: A Constraint on Language Acquisition
    2014 · Mechanisms of Language Acquisition
  9. Children's sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: Taxonomic versus thematic relations
    Markman, Ellen M., Hutchinson, Jean E. · 1984 · Cognitive Psychology
  10. The Mutual Exclusivity Bias in Children's Word Learning
    Merriman, William E., Bowman, Laura L., MacWhinney, Brian · 1989 · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development

Show all 24 references

Cited by (13)

  1. AT THE INTERFACE: DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS OF EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT LANGUAGE KNOWLEDGE
    Ellis, Nick C. · 2005 · Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  2. Individuation, relativity, and early word learning
    Gentner, Dedre, Boroditsky, Lera · 2001 · Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development
  3. Semantic Relations and the Lexicon: Antonymy, Synonymy and other Paradigms
    Murphy, M. Lynne · 2003 · Cambridge University Press eBooks
  4. Children's avoidance of lexical overlap: A pragmatic account.
    Diesendruck, Gil, Markson, Lori · 2001 · Developmental Psychology
  5. Fast Mapping but Poor Retention by 24‐Month‐Old Infants
    Horst, Jessica S., Samuelson, Larissa K. · 2008 · Infancy

See all 400

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Young children and adults use lexical principles to learn new nouns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0012-1649.28.1.99
The paper
Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Bailey, L. M., & Wenger, N. R. (1992). Young children and adults use lexical principles to learn new nouns. Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.28.1.99

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.