The psychophysiology of self-mutilation.

Abstract

Self-mutilators' psychophysiological and subjective responses during an imaged self-mutilative act were examined. Differences in arousal to 3 imaged control events (neutral, accidental injury, and aggression) were examined between 3 self-mutilation groups (prisoner, prisoner control, and nonprison control). Imagery scripts were presented in 4 stages; scene setting, approach, incident, and consequence. Results indicated a decrease in psychophysiological and subjective response during self-mutilation imagery. No such decrease was evident for nonmutilators who were administered standard self-mutilation imagery. A lag between psychophysiological and psychological response to the self-mutilative act was evident. Responses elicited during self-mutilation imagery were different from those of control imagery. Results indicated that self-mutilative behavior is maintained by its reinforcing tension-reducing qualities.

Cites (1)

1. A Bio‐Informational Theory of Emotional Imagery
   Lang, Peter J. · 1979 · Psychophysiology

Show all 1 references

Cited by (30)

1. The functions of deliberate self-injury: a review of the evidence
   Klonsky, E. David · 2007 · Clinical Psychology Review
2. Non-suicidal self-injury among adolescents: Diagnostic correlates and relation to suicide attempts
   NOCK, M, JOINERJR, T, GORDON, K, LLOYDRICHARDSON, E, PRINSTEIN, M · 2006 · Psychiatry Research
3. Self-Injury
   Nock, Matthew K. · 2010 · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
4. A Functional Approach to the Assessment of Self-Mutilative Behavior.
   Nock, Matthew K., Prinstein, Mitchell J. · 2004 · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
5. Solving the puzzle of deliberate self-harm: The experiential avoidance model
   Chapman, Alexander L., Gratz, Kim L., Brown, Milton Z. · 2006 · Behaviour Research and Therapy

See all 243