Toward the integration of classification theory and methods.
Abstract
Although various criteria have been proposed for the evaluation of psychiatric classifications, there is need for an integrated paradigm. This article presents such a framework based on the principles of construct validation. Emphasis is placed on the continual interplay between theory development and empirical analyses. First, the theory formulation component involves specification of the theoretical types and their functional linkages. Then, the internal validation component entails development of an empirical typology followed by an evaluation of its reliability, coverage, homogeneity, and robustness. Finally, the external validation component evaluates predictive validity with respect to treatment outcome, clinical meaningfulness of the diagnostic categories, descriptive validity, and generalizability of the typology to other populations. This framework is used to evaluate (a) the new diagnostic system (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Ill) developed by the American Psychiatric Association, (b) recent classifications of psychopathology that were derived using empirical clustering methods, and (c) classifications of behavioral disorders that have an explicit theoretical basis. A key challenge for the scientific understanding of abnormal behavior is to achieve a synergism between theory formulation and empirical classification methods. The history of psychiatric classification has been marked by sporadic periods of great activity. Recently, several developments have fueled a renewed interest in classifying mental and behavioral disorders. These include publication of a new diagnostic system (Diagnostic
Cites (4)
- The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for BiomedicineEngel, George L. · 1977 · Science
- Construct validity in psychological tests.Cronbach, Lee J., Meehl, Paul E. · 1955 · Psychological Bulletin
- Alcohol dependence: Provisional description of a clinical syndromeEdwards, G, Gross, M M · 1976 · BMJ
- DSM-III field trials: I. Initial interrater diagnostic reliability1979 · American Journal of Psychiatry
Cited by (9)
- Hopelessness depression: A theory-based subtype of depression.Abramson, Lyn Y., Metalsky, Gerald I., Alloy, Lauren B. · 1989 · Psychological Review
- Typologies of male batterers: Three subtypes and the differences among themHoltzworth-Munroe, Amy, Stuart, Gregory L. · 1994 · Psychological Bulletin
- Subtypes of reading disability: Variability around a phonological core.Morris, Robin D., Stuebing, Karla K., Fletcher, Jack M., Shaywitz, Sally E., Lyon, G. Reid, Shankweiler, Donald P., Katz, Leonard, Francis, David J., Shaywitz, Bennett A. · 1998 · Journal of Educational Psychology
- Studying the clinician: judgment research and psychological assessment1999 · Choice Reviews Online
- Evaluation of the Revised Ontario Child Health Study ScalesBoyle, Michael H., Offord, David R., Racine, Yvonne, Fleming, Jan E., Szatmari, Peter, Sanford, Mark · 1993 · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward the integration of classification theory and methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-843x.90.1.68
- The paper
- Skinner, H. A. (1981). Toward the integration of classification theory and methods. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-843x.90.1.68
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.