The DOI matches its Crossref record; 590 of the 590 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Studying the clinician: judgment research and psychological assessment
Abstract
Assessment of Personality and Psychopathology: Psychodiagnosis Case Formulation Behavioural Predication Treatment Planning Neuropsychological Assessment Methods and Recommendations for Making Judgements Clinical Judgement Computers and Judgement Improving Psychological Assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Social Work · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,519
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984
Development of a Rating Scale for Primary Depressive Illness
HAMILTON, M. (1967) · British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1967.tb00530.x · Cited by 8,410
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed
COOPER, A. M., & MICHELS, R. (1981) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.138.1.128 · Cited by 7,356
A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-2400 · Cited by 6,120
A Diagnostic Interview: The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia
Endicott, J. (1978) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770310043002 · Cited by 5,684
Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.213 · Cited by 5,436
Cited by
Ægisdóttir, S., White, M. J., Spengler, P. M., Maugherman, A. S., Anderson, L. A., Cook, R. S., Nichols, C. N., Lampropoulos, G. K., Walker, B. S., Cohen, G., et al. (2006) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000005285875 · Cited by 737
Hunsley, J., & Meyer, G. J. (2003) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.446 · Cited by 561
Lilienfeld, S. O., Ritschel, L. A., Lynn, S. J., Cautin, R. L., & Latzman, R. D. (2013) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.09.008 · Cited by 341
Neuropsychologists’ Validity Testing Beliefs and Practices: A Survey of North American Professionals
Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., & Odland, A. P. (2015) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2015.1087597 · Cited by 339
Jensen-Doss, A., & Hawley, K. M. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2010.517169 · Cited by 238
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1999-01-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 36-3045-36-3045
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1857205173
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 590
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Studying the clinician: judgment research and psychological assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.36-3045
- The paper
- Studying the clinician: judgment research and psychological assessment. (1999). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.36-3045
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
