The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Controlled prospective study of postpartum mood disorders: comparison of childbearing and nonchildbearing women
Abstract
A controlled prospective study was undertaken to determine the extent to which pregnancy and the puerperium are associated with increased risk for minor and major depression, depressive symptom-atology, and poor social adjustment. A large sample of childbearing (CB) women were recruited during the second trimester of pregnancy along with an equal sized, matched sample of nonchild-bearing (NCB) women. Ss were assessed multiple times during pregnancy and after delivery by questionnaire and through personal interview on measures of depression and other mood states and marital and social adjustment. There were no differences between CB and NCB Ss with respect to rates of minor and major depression during pregnancy or after delivery. However, CB women experienced significantly higher levels of depressive symptomatology and poor social adjustment than NCB women during late pregnancy and the early puerperium.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, studies of perinatal depression that included control groups of non-pregnant and non-postpartum women have not found different rates of depression across groups [52,53].”
From Perinatal mental illness: Definition, description and aetiology (2014) · cites this paper as [53]
Citations
Cites
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed
COOPER, A. M., & MICHELS, R. (1981) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.138.1.128 · Cited by 7,356
Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: New Scales for Assessing the Quality of Marriage and Similar Dyads
Spanier, G. B. (1976) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/350547 · Cited by 7,050
Research Diagnostic Criteria: Rationale and Reliability
Spitzer, R. L. (1978) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770300115013 · Cited by 6,951
A Diagnostic Interview: The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia
Endicott, J. (1978) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770310043002 · Cited by 5,684
Statistics for the social sciences
Hays, W. L. (1973) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,081
The Family History Method Using Diagnostic Criteria: Reliability and Validity
Andreasen, N. C. (1977) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1977.01770220111013 · Cited by 1,901
Assessment of social adjustment by patient self report.
Weissman, M. M. (1976) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770090101010 · Cited by 1,782
Regier, D. A. (1988) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800350011002 · Cited by 1,737
Epidemiology of Puerperal Psychoses
Kendell, R. E., Chalmers, J. C., & Platz, C. (1987) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.150.5.662 · Cited by 1,119
Cited by
Perinatal Depression: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Incidence
Gavin, N. I., Gaynes, B. N., Lohr, K. N., Meltzer-Brody, S., Gartlehner, G., & Swinson, T. (2005) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000183597.31630.db · Cited by 3,282
Rates and risk of postpartum depression – a meta-analysis
O'hara, M. W., & Swain, A. M. (1996) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/09540269609037816 · Cited by 3,116
Self-citationAntenatal risk factors for postpartum depression: a synthesis of recent literature
Robertson, E., Grace, S., Wallington, T., & Stewart, D. E. (2004) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2004.02.006 · Cited by 1,886
Postpartum depression: current status and future directions
O'Hara, M. W., & McCabe, J. E. (2013) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185612 · Cited by 1,750
Self-citationSubjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis.
Luhmann, M., Hofmann, W., Eid, M., & Lucas, R. E. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025948 · Cited by 1,410
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Hara, M. W., Zekoski, E. M., Philipps, L. H., & Wright, E. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology
- Published
- 1990-02
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-15
- ISSN
- 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1846
- OpenAlex
- W1990553277
- Cited by
- 610
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 15.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH39383)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy-related medical research
- Keywords
- postpartum depression, pregnancy, postpartum period, childbearing women, depressive symptoms, social adaptation, marital adjustment, mood disorders
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Iowa, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prospective Studies, Puerperal Disorders, Social Adjustment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Controlled prospective study of postpartum mood disorders: comparison of childbearing and nonchildbearing women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0021-843x.99.1.3
- The paper
- O'Hara, M. W., Zekoski, E. M., Philipps, L. H., & Wright, E. J. (1990). Controlled prospective study of postpartum mood disorders: comparison of childbearing and nonchildbearing women. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843x.99.1.3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.