Conditions under which employees respond positively to enriched work.

Oldham, Greg R., Hackman, J. Richard, Pearce, Jone L.·1976·Journal of Applied Psychology
DOI 10.1037//0021-9010.61.4.395

Cited by (7)

  1. The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review.
    Judge, Timothy A., Thoresen, Carl J., Bono, Joyce E., Patton, Gregory K. · 2001 · Psychological Bulletin
  2. Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature.
    Humphrey, Stephen E., Nahrgang, Jennifer D., Morgeson, Frederick P. · 2007 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  3. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement.
    James, Lawrence R. · 1982 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  4. Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature
    O’Neill, Thomas, McNeese, Nathan, Barron, Amy, Schelble, Beau · 2022 · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
  5. Does the Job Satisfaction—Job Performance Relationship Vary Across Cultures?
    Ng, Thomas W. H., Sorensen, Kelly L., Yim, Frederick H. K. · 2009 · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
  6. Effets du soutien organisationnel perçu et des caractéristiques de l’emploi sur l’anxiété au travail et l’épuisement professionnel : le rôle médiateur de la satisfaction des besoins psychologiques
    Gillet, N., Fouquereau, E., Huyghebaert, T., Colombat, P. · 2016 · Psychologie Française
  7. The Effects of Task Content and Reward Contingency Upon Task Performance and Satisfaction1
    Wimperis, Bruce R., Farr, James L. · 1979 · Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.